Politics šŸ—³ļø NZ Politics

NZWarriors.com
How can you unilaterally change a contract? Don't both parties need to agree changes?
So in the treaty, what were the principles? Who can define them? how was co-governance ever bought into it? With what authority?

Can only the Queen and those original 500 Maori define them?

If it was between Maori and the England (the treaty made Maori English subjects). Where is the NZ govt in all this?

Doesnā€™t the govt represent Maori, the queen and all of us through elections? Donā€™t more Maori voting for National than voted for the Maori party give the incumbent govt a mandate to govern?

Again, I support the concept weā€™re all equal; however donā€™t like the ACT solution but think itā€™s all pointless anyway and a show as itā€™s already a dead bill.
 
So in the treaty, what were the principles? Who can define them? how was co-governance ever bought into it? With what authority?

Can only the Queen and those original 500 Maori define them?

If it was between Maori and the England (the treaty made Maori English subjects). Where is the NZ govt in all this?

Doesnā€™t the govt represent Maori, the queen and all of us through elections? Donā€™t more Maori voting for National than voted for the Maori party give the incumbent govt a mandate to govern?

Again, I support the concept weā€™re all equal; however donā€™t like the ACT solution but think itā€™s all pointless anyway and a show as itā€™s already a dead bill.
The issue of co-governance will not go away when the ACT bill is defeated.
Eventually the country will have to confront it.
 
NZWarriors.com
Advertisement
If you would like to remove these advertisements, please do so by registering a free account
The issue of co-governance will not go away when the ACT bill is defeated.
Eventually the country will have to confront it.
Perhaps the two treaties partners can work towards that.

Rather than the Act Party and it's donors ramming it down the countries throat.
 
NZWarriors.com
Advertisement
If you would like to remove these advertisements, please do so by registering a free account
Perhaps New Zealanders can decide.
The issue was first raised by David Lange in the late 80's.
Perhaps they should, if the policy was actually well thought out and constructed in collaboration with the treaty partner

& not a bill thats rubbished by both sides of the political divide, rubbished by the legal community, rubbished by the academic community, rubbished by church leaders etc

Is there actually any well thought out argument in support of Seymours proposal anywhere? Can you post it?
 
NZWarriors.com
Advertisement
If you would like to remove these advertisements, please do so by registering a free account
NZWarriors.com
Advertisement
If you would like to remove these advertisements, please do so by registering a free account
Doesnā€™t the govt represent Maori, the queen and all of us through elections? Donā€™t more Maori voting for National than voted for the Maori party give the incumbent govt a mandate to govern?
Sure but governing doesn't mean breaking contracts because you feel like it. If you had agreed to sell your house to the crown for a million bucks and had a contract and David Seymour wanted to have a debate about paying you 10c instead would you support that coz a bunch of people like you voted for him?
 
Last edited:
NZWarriors.com
Advertisement
If you would like to remove these advertisements, please do so by registering a free account
Perhaps they should, if the policy was actually well thought out and constructed in collaboration with the treaty partner

& not a bill thats rubbished by both sides of the political divide, rubbished by the legal community, rubbished by the academic community, rubbished by church leaders etc

Is there actually any well thought out argument in support of Seymours proposal anywhere? Can you post it?
Let the public decide.
 
NZWarriors.com
Advertisement
If you would like to remove these advertisements, please do so by registering a free account
Sure but governing doesn't mean breaking contracts because you feel like it. If you had agreed to sell your house to the crown for a road for a million bucks and had a contract and David Seymour wanted to have a debate about paying you 10c instead would you support that coz a bunch of people like you voted for him?
What contract is going to be broken?
 
Back
Top