The Waikato Times
www.waikatotimes.co.nz
Sounds like hells angels need to be in charge of security again at concerts
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
So in the treaty, what were the principles? Who can define them? how was co-governance ever bought into it? With what authority?How can you unilaterally change a contract? Don't both parties need to agree changes?
The issue of co-governance will not go away when the ACT bill is defeated.So in the treaty, what were the principles? Who can define them? how was co-governance ever bought into it? With what authority?
Can only the Queen and those original 500 Maori define them?
If it was between Maori and the England (the treaty made Maori English subjects). Where is the NZ govt in all this?
Doesnāt the govt represent Maori, the queen and all of us through elections? Donāt more Maori voting for National than voted for the Maori party give the incumbent govt a mandate to govern?
Again, I support the concept weāre all equal; however donāt like the ACT solution but think itās all pointless anyway and a show as itās already a dead bill.
That worked out great for the Rolling Stonesā¦The Waikato Times
www.waikatotimes.co.nz
Sounds like hells angels need to be in charge of security again at concerts
The Waikato Times
www.waikatotimes.co.nz
Sounds like hells angels need to be in charge of security again at concerts
Perhaps the two treaties partners can work towards that.The issue of co-governance will not go away when the ACT bill is defeated.
Eventually the country will have to confront it.
Perhaps New Zealanders can decide.Perhaps the two treaties partners can work towards that.
Rather than the Act Party and it's donors ramming it down the countries throat.
Perhaps they should, if the policy was actually well thought out and constructed in collaboration with the treaty partnerPerhaps New Zealanders can decide.
The issue was first raised by David Lange in the late 80's.
So in the treaty, what were the principles? Who can define them? how was co-governance ever bought into it? With what authority?
Yes. We need a seance.Can only the Queen and those original 500 Maori define them?
I believe it was with the governor General I believe. I cbf looking it up but I would expect that the crown who is now the nz govt is now the representative for the former royaltyIf it was between Maori and the England (the treaty made Maori English subjects). Where is the NZ govt in all this?
Sure but governing doesn't mean breaking contracts because you feel like it. If you had agreed to sell your house to the crown for a million bucks and had a contract and David Seymour wanted to have a debate about paying you 10c instead would you support that coz a bunch of people like you voted for him?Doesnāt the govt represent Maori, the queen and all of us through elections? Donāt more Maori voting for National than voted for the Maori party give the incumbent govt a mandate to govern?
Again, I support the concept weāre all equal; however donāt like the ACT solution but think itās all pointless anyway and a show as itās already a dead bill.
Met her once, extremely nice lady. Very sad.ex National MP Nikki Kaye has passed away.
Just 44...
Yeah she seemed a high quality person. A good Auckland central MP & Open to ideas outside of her political leanings.Met her once, extremely nice lady. Very sad.
Let the public decide.Perhaps they should, if the policy was actually well thought out and constructed in collaboration with the treaty partner
& not a bill thats rubbished by both sides of the political divide, rubbished by the legal community, rubbished by the academic community, rubbished by church leaders etc
Is there actually any well thought out argument in support of Seymours proposal anywhere? Can you post it?
One died, one born. It all evened outThat worked out great for the Rolling Stonesā¦
Nothing worse than listening to fuckwits who canāt handle their piss yelling to play one we all know. Think the meds is the point, no piss at concerts, just potThe old folks just need a higher dose of their meds.
Imagine getting worked up at a Crowded House gig.
What contract is going to be broken?Sure but governing doesn't mean breaking contracts because you feel like it. If you had agreed to sell your house to the crown for a road for a million bucks and had a contract and David Seymour wanted to have a debate about paying you 10c instead would you support that coz a bunch of people like you voted for him?