wizard of Tauranga
π
Ironman
- Thread starter
- #12,821
So in the treaty, what were the principles? Who can define them? how was co-governance ever bought into it? With what authority?How can you unilaterally change a contract? Don't both parties need to agree changes?
Can only the Queen and those original 500 mΔori define them?
If it was between mΔori and the England (the treaty made mΔori English subjects). Where is the NZ govt in all this?
Doesnβt the govt represent mΔori, the queen and all of us through elections? Donβt more mΔori voting for National than voted for the mΔori party give the incumbent govt a mandate to govern?
Again, I support the concept weβre all equal; however donβt like the ACT solution but think itβs all pointless anyway and a show as itβs already a dead bill.