The Waikato Times
www.waikatotimes.co.nz
Sounds like hells angels need to be in charge of security again at concerts
Politics 🗳️ NZ Politics
- Thread starter wizard of Tauranga
- Start date
www.waikatotimes.co.nz
Sounds like hells angels need to be in charge of security again at concerts
NZWarriors.com
- Thread starter
- #12,822
So in the treaty, what were the principles? Who can define them? how was co-governance ever bought into it? With what authority?
Can only the Queen and those original 500 māori define them?
If it was between māori and the England (the treaty made māori English subjects). Where is the NZ govt in all this?
Doesn’t the govt represent māori, the queen and all of us through elections? Don’t more māori voting for National than voted for the māori party give the incumbent govt a mandate to govern?
Again, I support the concept we’re all equal; however don’t like the ACT solution but think it’s all pointless anyway and a show as it’s already a dead bill.
The issue of co-governance will not go away when the ACT bill is defeated.
Eventually the country will have to confront it.
NZWarriors.com
That worked out great for the Rolling Stones…The Waikato Times
Sounds like hells angels need to be in charge of security again at concerts
The Waikato Times
Sounds like hells angels need to be in charge of security again at concerts
The old folks just need a higher dose of their meds.
Imagine getting worked up at a Crowded House gig.
Perhaps the two treaties partners can work towards that.
Rather than the Act Party and it's donors ramming it down the countries throat.
NZWarriors.com
Perhaps New Zealanders can decide.
The issue was first raised by David Lange in the late 80's.
Perhaps they should, if the policy was actually well thought out and constructed in collaboration with the treaty partner
& not a bill thats rubbished by both sides of the political divide, rubbished by the legal community, rubbished by the academic community, rubbished by church leaders etc
Is there actually any well thought out argument in support of Seymours proposal anywhere? Can you post it?
NZWarriors.com
Principles are fluff. It's about the laws we ALL agree to abide by as a society. That's not up a unilateral decision for Seymour and his cronies.
Yes. We need a seance.
I believe it was with the governor General I believe. I cbf looking it up but I would expect that the crown who is now the nz govt is now the representative for the former royalty
NZWarriors.com
Sure but governing doesn't mean breaking contracts because you feel like it. If you had agreed to sell your house to the crown for a million bucks and had a contract and David Seymour wanted to have a debate about paying you 10c instead would you support that coz a bunch of people like you voted for him?
Last edited:
We are not all equal, you are going all woke on me.
Seymour knows it ain't going to fly, he is softening the public up for something less radical but equally as stupid.
Met her once, extremely nice lady. Very sad.
NZWarriors.com
Yeah she seemed a high quality person. A good Auckland central MP & Open to ideas outside of her political leanings.
Let the public decide.
One died, one born. It all evened out
NZWarriors.com
Nothing worse than listening to fuckwits who can’t handle their piss yelling to play one we all know. Think the meds is the point, no piss at concerts, just potThe old folks just need a higher dose of their meds.
Imagine getting worked up at a Crowded House gig.
What contract is going to be broken?
