You’re digging deeperJust trying to get my head around it…
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
You’re digging deeperJust trying to get my head around it…
Can you change two tens for my five@MaybeTop8 if you owe me $10, but I say just pay me $8; have I given you $2?
What about a bunch of fives.Can you change two tens for my five
You can read we both face similar supply problems. Esp around social housing - the UK with the sell off during 'Right to Buy' that wasn't replaced. NZ with sell offs over the last 30 years, particularly the 90s without replenishing the houses sold. Also issue around cost to build.For those who think that a land tax or CGT would help First Home Buyers in NZ, think again. Here's an article showing how FHB's in Britain are also struggling to get on to the property ladder.
How Britain killed its property market
More families are trapped by soaring housing costs or shut out of ownership altogether.www.nzherald.co.nz
A targeted tax at landowners and landlords who are perceived by the left as wealthy that doesn't help affordability. And you also believe the tax take would be spent on infrastructure, yeah right.A land tax and CGT aren’t meant to fix affordability on their own. They create another revenue stream for infrastructure to help address much needed supply and reduce speculative demand.
It seems we don’t have a lack of infrastructure problem, we have too big an immigration problem.You can read we both face similar supply problems. Esp around social housing - the UK with the sell off during 'Right to Buy' that wasn't replaced. NZ with sell offs over the last 30 years, particularly the 90s without replenishing the houses sold. Also issue around cost to build.
You could argue our housing market is even more inflated on average, because we don't have a CGT or Land Tax to curb speculative investment.
A land tax and CGT aren’t meant to fix affordability on their own. They create another revenue stream for infrastructure to help address much needed supply and reduce speculative demand.
A CGT or land tax isn’t about targeting wealthy individuals; it’s about creating revenue for underfunded infrastructure to increase supply. If that revenue isn’t going to infrastructure, it’s an accountability issue, not a problem with the tax itself. Ignoring these revenue streams just keeps prices inflated. What’s your solution to fix the supply issue?A targeted tax at landowners and landlords who are perceived by the left as wealthy that doesn't help affordability. And you also believe the tax take would be spent on infrastructure, yeah right.
Blaming immigration is convenient. The problem isn't people coming in; it's years of underfunding infrastructure that has caused a supply issue and cost increases. New migrants contribute to the economy, but shit planning and investment are the major contributors to our cost increases. Instead of scapegoating, why not fix the funding model and build what’s required?It seems we don’t have a lack of infrastructure problem, we have too big an immigration problem.
Reality is a city population of immigrants come in every year and the existing people need to fund a new city for them.
We expect the existing population to fund the necessary infrastructure for ever more housing for new people, on ever more costly land (further from city needing even more infrastructure). The existing population is unable to keep up the funding, with a resulting lowering of living standards, missed opportunity costs, affordability issues and ever more new tax grabs rather than being self supporting.
As we continue raising the bar to pay for immigration, the poor and young pay the price in rent increases and unaffordable housing.
NZ first was right all along
Absolute rubbish.Blaming immigration is convenient. The problem isn't people coming in; it's years of underfunding infrastructure that has caused a supply issue and cost increases.
Really how many Uber drivers importing their families does NZ need?New migrants contribute to the economy,
Which is the number 1 goal of any immigrants to Aus & NZ, obtain property. High immigration effects healthcare and housing disproportionately, it negatively effects social cohesion.Meanwhile, we’re still protecting a speculative property market that sucks up capital instead of driving real growth.
1 - it appears to me immigrants don’t increase the GDP per person to cover them coming here?Blaming immigration is convenient. The problem isn't people coming in; it's years of underfunding infrastructure that has caused a supply issue and cost increases. New migrants contribute to the economy, but shit planning and investment are the major contributors to our cost increases. Instead of scapegoating, why not fix the funding model and build what’s required?
You keep harping on about productivity, but that only happens with real investment (public and private) and a balanced economy. Meanwhile, we’re still protecting a speculative property market that sucks up capital instead of driving real growth. Where’s the incentive to invest in sectors that actually boost productivity?
What’s your actual plan to boost supply and living standards? A deportation scheme?
GDP per capita has has been going backwards for years. I assume NZ is the same.1 - it appears to me immigrants don’t increase the GDP per person to cover them coming here?
To mask the horrific effects of modern life on western birth rates. Turns out aborting 25% of all pregnancies has a negative effect on your population growth rate2 - so why even have immigration? When have we ever had a public debate about the level we want?
Back in June you were singing the praises of immigration to keep us afloat?It seems we don’t have a lack of infrastructure problem, we have too big an immigration problem.
Reality is a city population of immigrants come in every year and the existing people need to fund a new city for them.
We expect the existing population to fund the necessary infrastructure for ever more housing for new people, on ever more costly land (further from city needing even more infrastructure). The existing population is unable to keep up the funding, with a resulting lowering of living standards, missed opportunity costs, affordability issues and ever more new tax grabs rather than being self supporting.
As we continue raising the bar to pay for immigration, the poor and young pay the price in rent increases and unaffordable housing.
NZ first was right all along
Was I? Not my underlying world view. What was the context?Back in June you were singing the praises of immigration to keep us afloat?
wizard of TaurangaWas I? Not my underlying world view. What was the context?
By the way, with National raising speeds, wasn’t it great to have a long weekend with no road deaths
Housing just off my head:What’s your actual plan to boost supply and living standards? A deportation scheme?
That is great, unfortunately what’s not is violent crime up. Bad look to have a person killed riding on public transport amongst many more reportedBy the way, with National raising speeds, wasn’t it great to have a long weekend with no road deaths
A CGT or land tax IS about targeting wealthy individuals in the eyes of the left. It is nothing more than envy tax, it wont bring down land or house prices or fix supply.A CGT or land tax isn’t about targeting wealthy individuals; it’s about creating revenue for underfunded infrastructure to increase supply. If that revenue isn’t going to infrastructure, it’s an accountability issue, not a problem with the tax itself. Ignoring these revenue streams just keeps prices inflated. What’s your solution to fix the supply issue?
I don’t think that’s pro immigration at all. I was saying there that the figures are covered up by immigration and they would have been worse otherwise with the I’mmigration hiding how we are really going.wizard of Tauranga
wizard of Tauranga
Jun 21, 2024
Add bookmark
#9,159
Yesterday’s GDP data suggests the economy grew 0.2% in the March quarter.
But that was only thanks to the net 28,330 new immigrants who arrived over those three months to make up for the net 14,980 citizens who left.
Per capita, we’re now at least 18 months into a recession. Unless everyone has produced and earned more in the current quarter than in the previous three months, we’re 21 months into that recession.
The average New Zealander is nearly $300 a month down compared with September 2022, using March 2024 dollars. That’s $1200 a month less for a household of two parents and two kids. Collectively, we’ve all taken a 4.3% pay cut over 18 months, with more on the way.
There’s never been anything this bad as far back as Statistics NZ reports.
The recession after the Global Financial Crisis was close. In the 21 months from September 2007, we went back 4.2% on average. Our current malaise has happened faster and is worse.
Very bad times, yet it’s predicted to be at least another year before the reserve bank eases up….