Politics 🗳️ NZ Politics

🤖 AI Summary

📝 Summary:

The thread centers on New Zealand's upcoming election, primarily debating the economic management and policy differences between the center-left Labour government and center-right National/ACT opposition. Key criticisms target Labour's fiscal stewardship, citing ballooning government expenditure #7#272, housing unaffordability, and unfulfilled promises like KiwiBuild and dental care expansion #16#12. A user #7 highlighted Labour's annual 9% spending growth versus 1.5% under previous governments, arguing this fueled inflation. National's tax-cut policy faced scrutiny over funding gaps and legality, with user #215 questioning Luxon's reliance on "trust me" assurances.
Leadership competence emerged as a critical theme, particularly in later posts. Luxon drew heavy criticism after a contentious interview where he struggled to defend policy details #194#199#211, while Willis faced backlash for her economic credentials. Hipkins garnered fleeting praise for articulation but was ultimately seen as representing poor governmental outcomes #45#119. A trusted user #308 presented expert economic analysis contradicting Treasury optimism. Infrastructure issues—like Wellington's water crisis and the dental school staffing shortage—were cited as examples of systemic mismanagement #235#12. Notable policy debates included road-user charges for EVs #220, immigration impacts on rents #299, and coalition scenarios involving NZ First #182#258. Early fringe discussions on candidates' rugby allegiances gave way to substantive policy critiques, culminating in grim Treasury forecasts discussed in posts #271#304#308. User #168 also revealed concerns about Labour rushing regulatory changes to entrench policies pre-election.

🏷️ Tags:

Economic Policies, Housing Crisis, Leadership Competence

📊 Data Source: Based on ALL posts in thread (total: 10000 posts) | ⏱️ Total Generation Time: 20s
You don't have permission to regenerate AI summary.

NZWarriors.com

I don't care what they says. A business produces a service or product, it employs people. It does stuff. A landlord puts himself between a person and shelter and says I'll have a third of your wages if you want a roof over your head, you can't have a dog, can't put a picture up, can't grow veges, I'll mayyyybe fix your leaky tap eventually, oh and you can fuck off and move your kid to a different school in a year because i want to make some capital gains now, oh and on your way out the door you can pay 450 for a professional carpet cleaning before the open home, and no you can't have your bond back because the lino has a scratch in it.
That's okay.... I'll stop paying tax because you say it's not a service. Brilliant!!!

Do you actually read what you're saying? Not only can tenants put up pictures, they don't even need the landlords permission to re-paint a house. They can plant what ever they want (provided it's legal). A house only has to be "clean and tidy" when a tenant leaves it... tenacy agreements stating the house has to be professionally cleaned (including carpets) have been overturned in the Tenancy Tribunal... I know this because I've gone there to advocate on behave of tenants. It's the Tenancy Tribunal who decides how much of the bond gets held back and not the landlord.

And, BTW, a third of your wages to live in a house someone else owns is still one hell of a lot cheaper than over 50% that the median wage earners household pays for the mortgage for the median house in Auckland. A household would have to earn $66,000 more PA to only be paying 30% in mortgage repayments.

BTW, you still haven't answered the question about why you think my tenants should pay more rent if I wasn't able to claim the interest as an expense? Or don't you actually care about the tenants.... your idealogy only thinks about one side of what interest deducibility means.
 
Last edited:
And new Auckland CVs coming next month - which might sellers expectations drop a bit.
I think a lot of sellers at the moment (whether it is residential or commercial) are looking at what prices and interest rates have done recently, and are realistic about taking a small haircut to move forward.

Previously they’ve held out to smash a home run on sales price. But a bit of reality is providing a lot of liquidity in the market

And yes, new CVs. A 3-yearly lottery to see if you have won or lost, in the eyes of Auckland Council
 
Last edited:
I'm a homeowner. I care about people who aren't. You should try it.
me too.
i also care about those who aren’t.
in fact, i provide them warm, dry, safe rental accommodation to live in until
such time they are.
if they even want to be, that is.

you see people don’t generally move out of home as teenagers with enough money for a home deposit.
well, unless they have parents that can give it to them, but that would make them rich kids or privileged wouldn’t it?

we hate that.
 
Back
Top Bottom