- Thread starter
- #761
Hipkins is gone when he loses the election.With a Labour candidate saying that a "wealth tax is still being discussed" but then denied by Hipkins, it makes you wonder if Hipkins hasn't got the support of his caucus if these discussions are taking place behind his back or if ideas are being formulated on a "capital gains tax" or "wealth tax" under a different name but which would be acceptable to the Green and Māori Parties while still being able to say "we didn't introduce one" if it was required for potential coalition discussions.... "it's not a Wealth Tax, it's our new Fairness Tax".
Then there's always the "we didn't want one and we campaigned against one, but to get the support of our coalition partners, we have had to introduce one" excuse.
Or perhaps an extension of the "brightline tests" to include other assets which would have been covered in Labour's previous capital gains taxes. Remember the promises not to introduce new taxes.... they just changed the existing ones or called them "levies" instead.
There seems to be all sorts of ways of introducing either a WT or CPT despite Hipkins assurance otherwise.... just give it another name, blame another party or "fiddle" with existing taxes.
Or perhaps Hipkins doesn't enjoy the backing of the Labour caucus now that he did when he first became PM.
Labour will be a shell of itself with people behind the scenes positioning now for after the election where the greens will be about half Labours size.
Instead of reflecting on what went wrong and why the majority have gone right, they will look to their left at what was popular for the Greens and their big policy next election will be a wealth tax to ‘solve poverty’ (again).
On the Greens, where are the big green policies? They have progressively moved down the social engineering policy route and are just a really left version of Labour now instead of a progressive Green Party that can work across the spectrum.