A bit sounds familiar here too - https://www.theguardian.com/comment...sunak-javier-milei-donald-trump-atlas-network
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note : This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Big movement in subscription from 2020-2023.No surprises this lot are members of the atlas network - https://www.taxpayers.org.nz/our_mission
Have you forgotten about Labours tax cut of GST off fruit and veges?
Yea, it was pretty forgettable…
Probably would push it towards the black market but still not a good policy.Some facts about the smoking debate:
- NZ has the second highest cigarette prices in the world behind Australia. Asia costs about a tenth of NZ pricing.
- about 10% of cigarettes sold in NZ are currently on the black market. Import at 10% and markup…
- our high prices are directly linked to a high and increasing black market
If we tried to ban smoking and/or reduce outlets it just seems more and more will be done outside the official system.
![]()
Jarrod Gilbert: Why Luxon was right about the tobacco black market
OPINION: When Luxon said our smokefree laws would form a black market, he wasn't wrong.www.nzherald.co.nz
While I think it was a stupid idea to drop the Smokefree legislation, it also think there’s a degree of hypocrisy about how people who say they want prohibition for smoking and don’t think the government should be collecting as much tax from it also highlight how much money the government is missing out on by having a prohibition on marijuana. While the argument is the health impact of one over the other, there’s still the revenue and prohibition to consider.Probably would push it towards the black market but still not a good policy.
Just another dead rat Luxon had to swallow to get the PMs job.
Fair comment but he backed himself into a corner promising tax cuts with the foreign buyers policy and when he was forced to abandon that he was locked into something to cover his arseWhile I think it was a stupid idea to drop the Smokefree legislation, it also think there’s a degree of hypocrisy about how people who say they want prohibition for smoking and don’t think the government should be collecting as much tax from it also highlight how much money the government is missing out on by having a prohibition on marijuana. While the argument is the health impact of one over the other, there’s still the revenue and prohibition to consider.
Same thing happened to Jacinda in 2017. One of Labour’s main election promises was the Airport Light Rail project. That was deliberately left out of the agreement with NZ First because Labour knew NZF were opposed to it.Fair comment but he backed himself into a corner promising tax cuts with the foreign buyers policy and when he was forced to abandon that he was locked into something to cover his arse
Same thing happened to Jacinda in 2017. One of Labour’s main election promises was the Airport Light Rail project. That was deliberately left out of the agreement with NZ First because Labour knew NZF were opposed to it.
I think of it this way….. most election promises are only enticements to gain voters these days and will be dropped, changed by a party or adopted by a Government in order to get a coalition agreement through.
Sucks, I know, but that’s what happens with MMP (except 2020’s COVID election).
Agreed but the article about smoking and the black market isn't the reason for the dropping of the smoking legislation.Same thing happened to Jacinda in 2017. One of Labour’s main election promises was the Airport Light Rail project. That was deliberately left out of the agreement with NZ First because Labour knew NZF were opposed to it.
I think of it this way….. most election promises are only enticements to gain voters these days and will be dropped, changed by a party or adopted by a Government in order to get a coalition agreement through.
Sucks, I know, but that’s what happens with MMP (except 2020’s COVID election).
That's like saying 100% of the MDMA market was pushing to the black market because we banned it. It's like duh.- about 10% of cigarettes sold in NZ are currently on the black market. Import at 10% and markup…
- our high prices are directly linked to a high and increasing black market
If we tried to ban smoking and/or reduce outlets it just seems more and more will be done outside the official system.
My thoughts also.That's like saying 100% of the MDMA market was pushing to the black market because we banned it. It's like duh.
The difference with cigarettes is that it doesn't give you a high like all the other drugs. Only the people who are addicted will go to the black market. New people will not go underground to smoke cigarettes. Those new people will vape.
I think Nationals policy of not banning smoking is ridiculous. If they want more taxes, then slap another 20% on vapes, that would get them a lot more money and deter more people to start even if it's marginal.
How so?If we tried to ban smoking and/or reduce outlets it just seems more and more will be done outside the official system.
National and Act have been corrupted by the tobacco industryMy thoughts also.
The original article is a media biased article.
And their search for power. Dangerous stuffNational and Act have been corrupted by the tobacco industry
I think Charter schools have their place and don't think it is a waste of money. A recent overseas report where charter schools have been in place for longer showed them out performing the more traditional public system. The only ones who appeared to want them gone were Labour and surprise, surprise the teachers union. The problem we now have is that we have something that is different to mainstream, that helps particularly with māori and Pacific Islanders education but will be repealed when there is a change in government. That doesn't give certainly for these schools and would create a lot of changing back and forth over a relatively short period of time.Also watch act waste money on Charter schools. I rather they give that money to mental health and supporting those who are 16 and don't want to me at school, give them a career path and maybe when they are 22 decide that education is important.
Do you know how much money is spent per student compared to public schools?I think Charter schools have their place and don't think it is a waste of money. A recent overseas report where charter schools have been in place for longer showed them out performing the more traditional public system. The only ones who appeared to want them gone were Labour and surprise, surprise the teachers union. The problem we now have is that we have something that is different to mainstream, that helps particularly with māori and Pacific Islanders education but will be repealed when there is a change in government. That doesn't give certainly for these schools and would create a lot of changing back and forth over a relatively short period of time.
3 that failed to receive the final 1% of funding and mainly with a majority of priority learners that were likely to fall through the cracks. How many public schools are under 90% at that same time? And what was their penalties?Do you know how much money is spent per student compared to public schools?
I would accept it if charter schools were at a 90+% success rate but they don't. Use that money where it can improve outcomes. Kaupapa māori schools could probably use more funding.
Stuff
www.stuff.co.nz
From the article:Do you know how much money is spent per student compared to public schools?
I would accept it if charter schools were at a 90+% success rate but they don't. Use that money where it can improve outcomes. Kaupapa māori schools could probably use more funding.
Stuff
www.stuff.co.nz
I'm old enough to remember when charter schools started to be given public monies. Prior to that they were predominitely church- based.I think Charter schools have their place and don't think it is a waste of money. A recent overseas report where charter schools have been in place for longer showed them out performing the more traditional public system. The only ones who appeared to want them gone were Labour and surprise, surprise the teachers union. The problem we now have is that we have something that is different to mainstream, that helps particularly with māori and Pacific Islanders education but will be repealed when there is a change in government. That doesn't give certainly for these schools and would create a lot of changing back and forth over a relatively short period of time.