Politics 🤡 Donald Trump

Boston Boy said:
That is so unfortunate. I am sorry to hear that but I am glad they are addressing the concern. A leading Harvard scientist came to that conclusion with others, so it has to come out. There are unfortunate ramifications but I believe trying to stop or at least reduce autism cases is so important that it needs to be vocalised publicly far and wide for the well being of children and families all over, as I am sure you do.
Click to expand...
Have you read the abstract from that one study?

It is titled 'may' be linked.

It also recommends the continued judicious use of Paracetamol during pregnancy under medical oversight because the study acknowledges that 1) the causal link was found in prolonged use of more than four weeks 2) the study acknowledges that untreated fever or pain during pregnancy is dangerous to the foetus.

“Further research is needed to confirm the association and determine causality, but based on existing evidence, I believe that caution about acetaminophen use during pregnancy—especially heavy or prolonged use—is warranted.” https://hsph.harvard.edu/news/using...-may-increase-childrens-autism-and-adhd-risk/

So the Authors themselves acknowledge that more research is needed to confirm the studies findings. By the way this study was conducted by taking the stats from other studies and inferring a link (which is fine but it is not a direct finding from independent research, rather a statistical analysis of data which may or may not indicate a link at all).

Lastly the lead Author Baccarelli acknowledges that he has served as an expert witness in Acetaminophen (Paracetomol, same thing) court cases where plaintifs are suing the Drug companies. So saying he admits he has a vested interest in finding these claims to be accurate (Expert witnesses negotiate payment with lawyers in the States, unlike NZ where it is carefully arbitrated based off a hourly rates and classes).

In conclusion, it was best to leave this topic to the experts and let the relevant agencies advise the medical profession directly - rather than allow this dangerous politicization of potential half truths which could do more harm than good.

I get the angst about wanting to know the risks by the public, but there is a reason a GP prescribes you pills that are often linked to literally dozens of risks to patients without telling you all of them.....you would be in your Doctors office for hours and no one would ever take any medicine.

Have you read the side effect profile of every drug you have ever been prescribed (it is screeds long and often times words like cancer risk or heart attack stroke etc are quite common).

Bottom line, I would rather have a kid with autism than a dead kid.
 

NZWarriors.com

Remove ads
Boston Boy said:
It is much easier to assist nations where they are. If you bring in huge numbers of immigrants you tank your own country financially (look at Chicago and NY, they are a mess. Successful people who are paying large amount of taxes leave and it increases the spiral) they then lose the ability to help other countries. Mass unvetted migration is stupidity at its highest order. You have to be measured, selective and smart. Include skilled workers, people that will enrich the communities and culture as well as manageable amounts of asylum seekers and refugees. Mass migration is nuts! For the US it was mass unvetted migration, which involved drugs, sex traffickers, the exploitation of children, the straining of the cultural values and ties of a country. I support vetted legal migration and I support his view and am glad that he is bold enough to say. It's also screwing Europe and all those leaders are too scared? To do anything about it? We don't suffer this issue in NZ so it's hard to quantify but I am telling you Europe is in a bad space. There will be a reaction or street wars, which looks like its already starting.

I am not sure if you are aware that there are some NZ māori and Pacific Islanders and other minorities that have found it increasingly difficult to get state homes or government support. There is resentment in some of those communities even in NZ because as we increase our immigration numbers our infrastructure struggles to cope. This includes hospitals, policing etc. It is just reality. Then you want to ensure you have social cohesion, smart measured migration is important for all, especially our communities who need help.

This is not racism but common sense in my mind.
Click to expand...
Sweden is a good example of what happens when you bring in big numbers of immigrants in a short time frame.
 
Tragic said:
If you look at somewhere like the UK, the impact in the last 30 years of mass immigration has made the larger cities worse not better in many ways.
It's difficult to get right but also I have never heard anyone with a decent plan around what they want to achieve around migration. It's always just knee jerk reactions to a current need or problem.
Click to expand...

Mate, I'm from London and still have family there - its a much better place now than it was in the 1970s, largely due to immigration.

Fuck knows what Trump was on about.

And - if you know you're history - there's no people alive today with original British Islands DNA, there are no descendants of those people anywhere in the world.
 
Inruin said:
sometimes and that isn't the case in America though where they had literally millions of illegal immigrants coming in.

Even with legal immigration you still need to manage integration
Click to expand...
Not living there, I can only assume the reports of the borders being too lax in recent years are legitimate, but this is also a country proud of its roots as being built on immigrants. I’m sure argument would be that if they’re documented that they’re welcome to stay, but sometimes there’s more to the story with the immigrant sponsored for work and due to no fault of their own lose that sponsorship and work and are in a situation where they’re hiding and looking for the next opportunity. Many generally go there for the opportunity to work and make something for themselves
 
Lord Gnome of Mooloolaba said:
Like NZ is trying to do now - bring in low wage workers to prop up the workforce.
Click to expand...
Why the remedial work in Christchurch is going to be huge for the people that were brought here to rebuild after the earthquake. Often why our wages are low, because of competing against people willing to do the job for so much less. From knowing people that are timber merchants in South Auckland at one branch I know of, Asian builders are by far buying the most
 
Noitall said:
Not living there, I can only assume the reports of the borders being too lax in recent years are legitimate, but this is also a country proud of its roots as being built on immigrants. I’m sure argument would be that if they’re documented that they’re welcome to stay, but sometimes there’s more to the story with the immigrant sponsored for work and due to no fault of their own lose that sponsorship and work and are in a situation where they’re hiding and looking for the next opportunity. Many generally go there for the opportunity to work and make something for themselves
Click to expand...
Like any country there needs to be a process and a legal method of immigration. And countries, I think, have a right to manage that process in the best interests of the country.
 
Noitall said:
this is also a country proud of its roots as being built on immigrants.
Click to expand...
Times change. Where once there was land and resources available for everyone, now we face resource limitations and need to manage our populations to live sustainable both economically and environmentally.

The problem seems to be western countries are limiting their populations to try to live within their means. Poorer countries have massive unsustainable population explosions and then the people want to go to the better managed countries instead of being part of the solution in their own countries.
 
Inruin said:
Like any country there needs to be a process and a legal method of immigration. And countries, I think, have a right to manage that process in the best interests of the country.
Click to expand...
Yeah I can agree with that but I do find masked people taking people off the streets as troublesome and not a fan of the direction that could potentially take. Right from his initial run there seems like there’s been a deliberate attempt to vilify immigrants when he was labelling that caravan moving as rapists and murderers. Just like most things there’s some plausibility in what he says, but the method in the ways of combating it are often concerning
 
wizard of Tauranga said:
Times change. Where once there was land and resources available for everyone, now we face resource limitations and need to manage our populations to live sustainable both economically and environmentally.

The problem seems to be western countries are limiting their populations to try to live within their means. Poorer countries have massive unsustainable population explosions and then the people want to go to the better managed countries instead of being part of the solution in their own countries.
Click to expand...
There still is land and resources available for everyone, the difference now is that money is the overwhelming driver and you can buy your way into anywhere you like if you have the means. We’re being asked to live within our means when our governments set the rules and our lives are conducted by what they say and where they allocate money. Our infrastructure is derelict because maintenance isn’t a flashy building that you can put your name on or something to the effect
 
This is not how normal government's conduct themselves on border and immigration matters at all & the copium in this thread ignoring this is mind boggling to be honest.


View: https://x.com/DHSgov/status/1970251208322621530

If you haven't been to London, New York, Chicago or Sweden recently I'm sorry but I'm totally dubious & find it more likely the internet brain rot is deep.

I've been to London and New York this year and both have had massive upswings in the last 10 years.
 
Boston Boy said:
That is so unfortunate. I am sorry to hear that but I am glad they are addressing the concern. A leading Harvard scientist came to that conclusion with others, so it has to come out. There are unfortunate ramifications but I believe trying to stop or at least reduce autism cases is so important that it needs to be vocalised publicly far and wide for the well being of children and families all over, as I am sure you do.
Click to expand...
Trump and Kennedy are disinformation peddlers and anti science.
 
juju said:
This is not how normal government's conduct themselves on border and immigration matters at all & the copium in this thread ignoring this is mind boggling to be honest.


View: https://x.com/DHSgov/status/1970251208322621530

If you haven't been to London, New York, Chicago or Sweden recently I'm sorry but I'm totally dubious & find it more likely the internet brain rot is deep.

I've been to London and New York this year and both have had massive upswings in the last 10 years.
Click to expand...

Where did you go?
I have been to both Chicago and NY in recent times as well as Paris and if you turn down the wrong st you will find out. The cities try token up appearances however the it is getting more and more difficult.
 
Who takes medical advice from Trump (or social media commentators for that matter). Talk to your own doctor if you are pregnant.

I’ve a family member who is non verbal and on the spectrum and anything anyone can do to research, go for it! Somethings making cases rise.
 
Boston Boy said:
Where did you go?
I have been to both Chicago and NY in recent times as well as Paris and if you turn down the wrong st you will find out. The cities try token up appearances however the it is getting more and more difficult.
Click to expand...
I was in New York and London in July - they were perfectly normal.
Lived in London in 1999. Visited every few years - it's improving. The biggest difference is everyone uses the cycle paths.

The issue with the normal citizens in those cities have are gentrification and cost of living. Not immigrants running wild.

If you turn down the wrong street in any city "you will find out" that's nothing new.
It's not getting more and more difficult at all - compare NY of the 70s and 80s to present time and it's a very very stark improvement.
 
juju said:
It's not getting more and more difficult at all - compare NY of the 70s and 80s to present time and it's a very very stark improvement.
Click to expand...
People arent comparing to the peak of the 80s/90s though. They are comparing it to the last 5-10 years. Crime has been rising since 2020. (Very hard to get 24-25 data)

1758762923740.webp
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom