- Thread starter
- #17,821
āInstead of targeting not-for-profits, Seymour now leaned on the new Early Childhood Education Equity Index to identify which schools would most benefit from free food.āSeymour is corrupt. Privatisation and wealth extraction is his mission
![]()
Ministry warned Seymour of public reaction to KidsCan contract
David Seymour earmarked $8m for non-profit ECE centres, but ended up quietly opening the door to private businesses when the scheme was announced.newsroom.co.nz
This is as it should be. Children in need in low decile (old terminology) centres regardless of who owns it before rich kids in rich areas in ānon profitā centres.
Needs and outcomes for hungry kids is heaps more important than who owns the service isnāt it?
Or rich kids in not for profits are more deserving than poor kids getting free fees in private centres?
P.s. You do realise half the ānon profitā centres are a front for private property empires⦠eg the biggest provider in NZ (Best Start).
Last edited: