Politics 🗳️ NZ Politics

🤖 AI Summary

📝 Summary:

The thread centers on New Zealand's upcoming election, primarily debating the economic management and policy differences between the center-left Labour government and center-right National/ACT opposition. Key criticisms target Labour's fiscal stewardship, citing ballooning government expenditure #7#272, housing unaffordability, and unfulfilled promises like KiwiBuild and dental care expansion #16#12. A user #7 highlighted Labour's annual 9% spending growth versus 1.5% under previous governments, arguing this fueled inflation. National's tax-cut policy faced scrutiny over funding gaps and legality, with user #215 questioning Luxon's reliance on "trust me" assurances.
Leadership competence emerged as a critical theme, particularly in later posts. Luxon drew heavy criticism after a contentious interview where he struggled to defend policy details #194#199#211, while Willis faced backlash for her economic credentials. Hipkins garnered fleeting praise for articulation but was ultimately seen as representing poor governmental outcomes #45#119. A trusted user #308 presented expert economic analysis contradicting Treasury optimism. Infrastructure issues—like Wellington's water crisis and the dental school staffing shortage—were cited as examples of systemic mismanagement #235#12. Notable policy debates included road-user charges for EVs #220, immigration impacts on rents #299, and coalition scenarios involving NZ First #182#258. Early fringe discussions on candidates' rugby allegiances gave way to substantive policy critiques, culminating in grim Treasury forecasts discussed in posts #271#304#308. User #168 also revealed concerns about Labour rushing regulatory changes to entrench policies pre-election.

🏷️ Tags:

Economic Policies, Housing Crisis, Leadership Competence

📊 Data Source: Based on ALL posts in thread (total: 10000 posts) | ⏱️ Total Generation Time: 20s
You don't have permission to regenerate AI summary.
I personally don't have a problem with public hospitals supplementing the public PROVIDED it's not at the expense of the public systems through loss of staff to private clinics/hospitals and the money for the contracted procedures is the same budgeted amount whether it's performed publicly or privately if it means that waiting lists come down. Especially considering that a number of richer people will already have health insurance meaning that, for a lot of elective surgeries in the public system, it's those without it who are forced to suffer longer sitting on a public waiting list.

From personal experience. Because we had medical insurance (provided through my wife's work), S was about to have her cancer surgery and start chemo ASAP after she was diagnosed. A few months earlier, a friend of ours was diagnosed with a less aggressive form of breast cancer but she had to go through the public system. Because of delays seeing an oncologist and then with the surgery, it became far more aggressive and unfortunately she passed away within six months of finishing her chemo. The oncologist told her husband that she would have had a far better chance of surviving if he had seen her earlier.

During Helen Clark's time as PM, my mother had both her cataract operations done privately but funded by the public system. The change in her was dramatic as she used to be a piano teacher and wasn't able to play for a few years because of not being able to see the music. That led to depression and drugs to overcome that. The change, after the second eye was operated on, was almost immediate and she was soon off the antidepressants.

It's a pity if we decided not to allow most people to be given the healthcare, either publicly or privately, they need faster because of political ideologies about spreading the health load in both public and private facilities.
 
Last edited:

NZWarriors.com

I've replied continuously your math is shite
If you can’t understand someone working part time with the same 10 day entitlement gets a larger percentage of their time available as sick leave than someone working full time, then you shouldn’t be commenting on this debate.

It’s what it’s all about and why it’s fundamentally unfair on full time workers and disproportionately assists part time workers and severely affects consistency in workplaces.
1750197023708.webp
 
BNZ and Westpac have announced further cuts in some of their mortgage rates.... the second time within three weeks.

Just refixed yesterday for a year at 4.89% with ANZ. Kept repayments the same and took 7 years off loan length.

If everyone does that we pay down debt faster but don’t have the discretionary income to pump into the economy 🤔
 
Last edited:
Nobody's arguing whether anyone is entitled to their contractual entitlements. A contract between employee and employer specifies what each party's rights are, and both parties are entitled to exercise those rights.

Just interesting that in some industries, there is a relaxed approach to the employer enforcing its rights when sick leave is taken. When I have said to a nurse "I've run out of annual leave" and they say "you get 10 days sick leave - just take a few of them". And it has been a couple of times I've noticed this attitude towards using 10 days or losing them. To be honest, it has been the older generation rather than the new ones I've met

Not throwing stones at them - just an interesting observation. They are obviously highly worked an underpaid on a salary basis. But also should consider how sick leave is used by some as "free" annual leave
 
Are you going to buy another rental?
Just bought a development site 3 months ago and in the process of subdividing.

Moving a relocatable house on next week and looking for another one before the end of the year.

Also bought another subdividable site for a couple of years time recently as well.

Uncertain times with rents dropping and prices bouncing around the bottom of the cycle but it all stacks up based on rental income as a long term investment, not to develop and sell.

Opportunity abounds if you look long term.
 
Are you going to buy another rental?
But more importantly our tourism business has a big $2m expansion project that’s been on hold the last few years as feasibility doesn’t stack up. Interest rates dropping, tourism rebounding, inflation under control, etc makes it doable again so have the architect onto it with a view to doing next year.
 
Back
Top Bottom