Politics 🗳️ NZ Politics

🤖 AI Summary

📝 Summary:

The thread centers on New Zealand's upcoming election, primarily debating the economic management and policy differences between the center-left Labour government and center-right National/ACT opposition. Key criticisms target Labour's fiscal stewardship, citing ballooning government expenditure #7#272, housing unaffordability, and unfulfilled promises like KiwiBuild and dental care expansion #16#12. A user #7 highlighted Labour's annual 9% spending growth versus 1.5% under previous governments, arguing this fueled inflation. National's tax-cut policy faced scrutiny over funding gaps and legality, with user #215 questioning Luxon's reliance on "trust me" assurances.
Leadership competence emerged as a critical theme, particularly in later posts. Luxon drew heavy criticism after a contentious interview where he struggled to defend policy details #194#199#211, while Willis faced backlash for her economic credentials. Hipkins garnered fleeting praise for articulation but was ultimately seen as representing poor governmental outcomes #45#119. A trusted user #308 presented expert economic analysis contradicting Treasury optimism. Infrastructure issues—like Wellington's water crisis and the dental school staffing shortage—were cited as examples of systemic mismanagement #235#12. Notable policy debates included road-user charges for EVs #220, immigration impacts on rents #299, and coalition scenarios involving NZ First #182#258. Early fringe discussions on candidates' rugby allegiances gave way to substantive policy critiques, culminating in grim Treasury forecasts discussed in posts #271#304#308. User #168 also revealed concerns about Labour rushing regulatory changes to entrench policies pre-election.

🏷️ Tags:

Economic Policies, Housing Crisis, Leadership Competence

📊 Data Source: Based on ALL posts in thread (total: 10000 posts) | ⏱️ Total Generation Time: 20s
You don't have permission to regenerate AI summary.

NZWarriors.com

No wonder the left cant pick political shifts. The chamber echoes loudly. You label any speech you disgree with an "ism" and then promptly ignore it. There's zero introspection as to why people feel that why.

As for condemning the "racist" comment above, if only some people held that same energy for helping.

The unemployment rates for Māori have increased by more than 4 times the national rate. In figures released yesterday from Statistics New Zealand, unemployment rates for Māori hit a four-year high of 8.2%, up by 1.4%. Similarly, rates for Pacific peoples have surged by 1.5% to reach 7.4%. In comparison, the national unemployment rate has risen by 0.3%, reaching 4.3% in the quarter ending March 2024.
Lol, was I wrong to call it out? Brownstone deleted his fucking post. Unless you're meaning something else?
This whole Treaty bill is culture wars stirred up because fiscal conservatives don't have any good policy to help the economy.
I'm all for helping māori and other poorly served communities. We as a country don't want to though - I try to do my bit.
 
Did you feel the same about He Puapua?

Arguably we wouldn’t be where we are now with Seymour’s platform without the new interpretations it forced on us with no consultation 🤔
It was a discussion document, not policy. You're probably right - Labour are trash at messaging.
Wider opinion - I think co-governance should play a larger role in our governance structure.
 
Wider opinion - I think co-governance should play a larger role in our governance structure.
How do we debate that.

Who gets to decide if our democratically elected people aren't allowed to ‘change’ the treaty?

What happens when māori make up both sides (iwi and govt?) should they remove themselves from the govt over treaty issues?

My personal issue is affirmative action. It’s totally wrong (in my opinion); doesn’t help those it seeks to and creates an us and them (on both sides).
 
Last edited:
Sowell has a quote for everything

View attachment 10061
I'll follow you down this foxhole Sarge,

"Until the spring of 1972, Sowell was a registered Democrat, after which he then left the Democratic Party and resolved not to associate with any political party again, stating "I was so disgusted with both candidates that I didn't vote at all."[11] Though he is often described as a black conservative, Sowell said, "I prefer not to have labels, but I suspect that 'libertarian' would suit me better than many others, although I disagree with the libertarian movement on a number of things."

Feels good so far
 
I'll follow you down this foxhole Sarge,

"Until the spring of 1972, Sowell was a registered Democrat, after which he then left the Democratic Party and resolved not to associate with any political party again, stating "I was so disgusted with both candidates that I didn't vote at all."[11] Though he is often described as a black conservative, Sowell said, "I prefer not to have labels, but I suspect that 'libertarian' would suit me better than many others, although I disagree with the libertarian movement on a number of things."

Feels good so far
images (2).webp
 
Im firmly with Alan Duff on this.

My position on this has nothing to do with māori, but everything to do with Thomas Sowells teachings.
Sowell has some merit, a cornerstone of his thinking is that education is big factor to escaping poverty. I'm not against some personal responsibility.
But in New Zealand, we don’t do nearly enough to reduce barriers to educational achievement. You could argue we actively put up barriers, with high housing costs/rental insecurity, food costs, overall underfunding of education.
 
Back
Top Bottom