Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah I agree. We couldn't execute the plan.
We have prob got less injured players than most sides.Yeah I agree. We couldn't execute the plan.
The same plan we executed all season to get to the top four.
It is not the players, it is not the coach, the Warriors have lost too many key personnel that Webster rightly created a unit out of.
We will not be a lot better until Egan comes back.
We need two fit Centers so that Capewell can go back to being a motivating force in our kick chase, and we need Berry to lead the pace of that chase.
We need Metcalf at six to open up our attack.
We need Barnett to support JFH leg speed fast ruck play game style.
We need a winger to give Webster realistic defensive options.
Put all those things in place and Websters choice of players is fine, no one is too old, no wall.....
And we need to stop with this next man up bullshit, it is fine in principle and as a guiding metaphor but it is complete bullshit to pretend that a NSW cup player does not bring massive down sides because of the loss of experience in your team.
I believe in the next man up, just not the next five or six men up all at once.
We have prob got less injured players than most sides.
Dont accept injured players as a reason for poor performance /rotation/game plan,.
Agree with you about the quality of our injured players.It is not about the numbers of personnel. Too easy to be flippant about losing your Dally M leader, then your fringe NSW hooker, Your NSW Prop forward.
This is the Warriors not some Aussie club that can quickly do some local horse trading to fix personnel issues mid season.
So if you think Websters game plan is wrong, then what is your position on getting rid of Webster?
Our Wingers and Centers outside of Pompey cannot tackle (not including Roger he is an ex fullback).Agree with you about the quality of our injured players.
Webster is still learning how to manage the replacement situation and last night should be a big wake up call for him.
Capes TMM Marata and Healey especially need to be handled better
For me I would have Marata starting at 10
Healey at 9 or 14 depending on Egan being available
Capes to second row and cover for centre only if needed.
Tmm either fullback or back to cup.
Surely with the success of the cup team we have a couple of outside backs that can be promoted. Every other team does it.
Team looks much better with TMM at 6.
I'm not of the wholesale changes ilk, I feel I stare pretty clear of that side of things.Yeah I agree. We couldn't execute the plan.
The same plan we executed all season to get to the top four.
It is not the players, it is not the coach, the Warriors have lost too many key personnel that Webster rightly created a unit out of.
We will not be a lot better until Egan comes back.
We need two fit Centers so that Capewell can go back to being a motivating force in our kick chase, and we need Berry to lead the pace of that chase.
We need Metcalf at six to open up our attack.
We need Barnett to support JFH leg speed fast ruck play game style.
We need a winger to give Webster realistic defensive options.
Put all those things in place and Websters choice of players is fine, no one is too old, no wall.....
And we need to stop with this next man up bullshit, it is fine in principle and as a guiding metaphor but it is complete bullshit to pretend that a NSW cup player does not bring massive down sides because of the loss of experience in your team.
I believe in the next man up, just not the next five or six men up all at once.
Only on paper.Team looks much better with TMM at 6.
He can change his game plan change some players be less conservativeIt is not about the numbers of personnel. Too easy to be flippant about losing your Dally M leader, then your fringe NSW hooker, Your NSW Prop forward.
This is the Warriors not some Aussie club that can quickly do some local horse trading to fix personnel issues mid season.
So if you think Websters game plan is wrong, then what is your position on getting rid of Webster?
Exactly, I don't get Webby. He is a great coach in some aspects, but player selection of DWZ/Capewah together hasn't worked + so many players look injured. CNK looked so very broken. Bringing him back injured is not a good idea, as it only leads to more issues, especially when you have TT in place, or is he injured too?Thought Pomps actually shored up that right edge pretty well when moved there. Would be tempted to keep him there, Capes is clearly busted and hampered, which probably isn't helping Dals decision making. Is it time for EIT to come in and play on Roger's side? or is he exclusively 2nd row now? I thought Webby was all about 'Next man up' and NOT playing guys busted this season.