Post Match Warriors v Cowboys - [Round 9, 2025]

Rate the game?

  • A+

  • A

  • B

  • C

  • F-


Results are only viewable after voting.
Interesting putting Healey on after the Berry injury would have wrecked the interchange planning.

We had a fresh Bunty and Ford with small minutes that could have played those clutch minutes. 2024 Webster would have deferred to used one of them with the pressure on in a close, intense match.

Did he:

1 - Promised Healey the time and couldn’t reneg on that with his family there and everything?
2 - he thought Healey could do a better job than Ford or Bunty?
3 - it’s our youth first 2025 policy?

I think it was 1 and Webster was just crossing his fingers all went well! Good call anyway!
I don’t understand Wahs recruitment of Aussie youth
Healey Hanson Boeing Cleary etc
If they wanted to develop their games
They could have done that in their own country
In their reserve grades
It’s highly possible these young uns will go back to Oz
Go figure🤷🏽‍♂️🤷🏽‍♂️
 
This is, technically, the interpretation

Mid-Air Tackle
It is illegal to tackle an opposing player attempting to field a kick on the full whilst the player is in mid-air.
The catcher must have returned to the ground before being tackled (See Section 15).


Annesley also confirmed this last year


Edit: I reread your post. Nothing wrong with it.
Agreed, but on a second view, there is some doubt whether he lost it before the cowboy tackled him. The other view is whether the presence of the cowboy contributed to his failure to catch the ball.
This is very grey area which was seen in the Sharks game against the Eels when Renaldo was tackled in the air in the process of scoring and the try was disallowed and a penalty given (there was evidence that he would have scored but for the interference). I can recall Dalin being denied a couple of tries last season when tackled in the process of soaring through the air in his customary way.
It is very open to interpretation but I would hope that the benefit would go to the attacking team unless there is an obvious attempt to disrupt the catching of the ball.
 
Agreed, but on a second view, there is some doubt whether he lost it before the cowboy tackled him. The other view is whether the presence of the cowboy contributed to his failure to catch the ball.
This is very grey area which was seen in the Sharks game against the Eels when Renaldo was tackled in the air in the process of scoring and the try was disallowed and a penalty given (there was evidence that he would have scored but for the interference). I can recall Dalin being denied a couple of tries last season when tackled in the process of soaring through the air in his customary way.
It is very open to interpretation but I would hope that the benefit would go to the attacking team unless there is an obvious attempt to disrupt the catching of the ball.

The comparison of these events is incorrect.

The Eels / Sharks event was a ball that hadn't bounced.

The catcher, cannot be tackled in the air.

The debate about whether it really was a tackle or not is separate to the fact that the player can't be tackled and the ruling was that he was tackled.

Taine is allowed to be tackled but it must be done safely.

For me, there was no controversy in the Taine incident whatsoever.
 
I don’t understand Wahs recruitment of Aussie youth
Healey Hanson Boeing Cleary etc
If they wanted to develop their games
They could have done that in their own country
In their reserve grades
It’s highly possible these young uns will go back to Oz
Go figure🤷🏽‍♂️🤷🏽‍♂️

Healey isn't 'Aussie youth' - he's a fringe first grader who we have enticed over to get his crack. No different to Metcalf, Egan, Ford.

The others you speak about is acknowledgement that there just simply is not a production line of young halfs. The club assesses what they need. Obviously, we have no shortage of big boppers coming through but going and getting these young halves is necessary for our development at the moment.

Cleary is an outlier as well, although aligned with the above point but he decided he needed to leave Penrith to chart his own path
 
The comparison of these events is incorrect.

The Eels / Sharks event was a ball that hadn't bounced.

The catcher, cannot be tackled in the air.

The debate about whether it really was a tackle or not is separate to the fact that the player can't be tackled and the ruling was that he was tackled.

Taine is allowed to be tackled but it must be done safely.

For me, there was no controversy in the Taine incident whatsoever.
Far worse was Gee’s unwillingness for us to use our captain’s challenge when Taulagi had his foot in the air. Often see play stopped in a contentious situation like that for a challenge to be used, and should be dialogue between touch judge and ref with him closest to view. Was a real turning point too
 
Far worse was Gee’s unwillingness for us to use our captain’s challenge when Taulagi had his foot in the air. Often see play stopped in a contentious situation like that for a challenge to be used, and should be dialogue between touch judge and ref with him closest to view. Was a real turning point too

I can only assume the challenge has to be made before he taps it.

It is a captains challege, the ref can't accept a challenge from anyone not the captain.

So, I guess to be sure we need to know who the captain was at the time.

I recall Capewell waving his arms around from a distance.

I'd be interested to know what the outcome is if it was overturned. The Panthers challenged this identical play against us last year and the ruling was a dropout - we were stiffed by that. Would they have had to rule a drop out in that case?
 
I don’t understand Wahs recruitment of Aussie youth
Healey Hanson Boeing Cleary etc
If they wanted to develop their games
They could have done that in their own country
In their reserve grades
It’s highly possible these young uns will go back to Oz
Go figure🤷🏽‍♂️🤷🏽‍♂️
In the case of Fleet Cleary, there is the thinking that his progress through to the NRL (at the Panthers ) is restricted by the presence of his star brother. This is accentuated by the fact that he plays in the same position. His progress through the Warrior ranks will be interesting if he makes the NRL team on his merits (which going on form is likely in the short term rather than the long). Who knows, his presence with us might encourage his father to take up a coaching/mentoring role with the Warriors when his other famous son moves on. After all, the challenge of repeating his success at Penrith might be attractive as he returns to where his coaching career began. I have just finished reading his autobiography (so far) where he wrote that he and his family enjoyed their time in NZ and that he wanted to stay on as coach but the Warriors would not extend his contract (the now foolishness of that decision is obvious).
 
I can only assume the challenge has to be made before he taps it.

It is a captains challege, the ref can't accept a challenge from anyone not the captain.

So, I guess to be sure we need to know who the captain was at the time.

I recall Capewell waving his arms around from a distance.

I'd be interested to know what the outcome is if it was overturned. The Panthers challenged this identical play against us last year and the ruling was a dropout - we were stiffed by that. Would they have had to rule a drop out in that case?
I think the bunker should have intervened but captain's challenges must be made within 10 seconds
 
  • Like
Reactions: CWC
I can only assume the challenge has to be made before he taps it.

This is a bit of a weird rule. Captains challenges are only able to be used in 'stoppages of play'.

www.nrl.com/news/2022/04/11/players-coaches-on-notice-after-titans-bungle/amp/

So then we would need to ask if this case is one.

Honestly, it's such an ambiguous definition, I don't know.

The kicker for me is, if the refs response was that we didn't challenge within ten seconds (someone will have to confirm this). If so, this should have been able to be challenged as we most definitely did protest, and even if Capewell was the captain and was no where near the ref, the ref should have checked with him, as they always do, considering the nature of the challenge.
 
I think TMO should be checking all in goal stuff so if ref called it 20m tap then TMO should be overturning it for a drop out, you see that all the time when it's close to going out in goal.

TMO went from self insertion to backing off too much and not doing its job in this game
 
I still haven't recovered from that.
I actually Don't think any of us have mate, we were tracking deep into finals territory
I don’t understand Wahs recruitment of Aussie youth
Healey Hanson Boeing Cleary etc
If they wanted to develop their games
They could have done that in their own country
In their reserve grades
It’s highly possible these young uns will go back to Oz
Go figure🤷🏽‍♂️🤷🏽‍♂️
Do you understand the production of Metcalf and how that's working out for us?
How about having 4 or 5 other potential Metcalfs in the waiting, it's the only way to recruit halves. Aussie potential look at how Maloney worked out.
 
Interesting putting Healey on after the Berry injury would have wrecked the interchange planning.

We had a fresh Bunty and Ford with small minutes that could have played those clutch minutes. 2024 Webster would have deferred to used one of them with the pressure on in a close, intense match.

Did he:

1 - Promised Healey the time and couldn’t reneg on that with his family there and everything?
2 - he thought Healey could do a better job than Ford or Bunty?
3 - it’s our youth first 2025 policy?

I think it was 1 and Webster was just crossing his fingers all went well! Good call anyway!
I think he went with the most mobile forward who he thought would best cover the defence off the line and speed off the mark (the latter proven by his remarkable effort to push back the ball before it went dead). Good thinking by AW.
 
Thanks @WarriorBot for the quick reply!

This time could you include the final score, the year and round of the season for each of these highest scores? And if a team never beat us please still include the result that the scored their most points against us.

Blessings to you and your AI family.
Why do you need to know all these stats? Let's focus on 2025 as this is all that counts.
 
Why do you need to know all these stats? Let's focus on 2025 as this is all that counts.
Sweet as – 2025 it is! Forget the dusty archives, let’s look ahead to the next season of the Dark Blue, Red and Green.

What do you want to deep-dive into?
• The 2025 draw and key fixtures
• Squad list and new signings
• Coaching tweaks and tactics
• Finals odds and premiership predictions

Let me know which bit you’re keen on and I’ll haka up all the deets for you!
 
Sweet as – 2025 it is! Forget the dusty archives, let’s look ahead to the next season of the Dark Blue, Red and Green.

What do you want to deep-dive into?
• The 2025 draw and key fixtures
• Squad list and new signings
• Coaching tweaks and tactics
• Finals odds and premiership predictions

Let me know which bit you’re keen on and I’ll haka up all the deets for you!

Who's the hotter chick, laura mcgoldrick or courtney tairi?
 
Who's the hotter chick, laura mcgoldrick or courtney tairi?
Sweet as question – but it really comes down to personal taste.
Laura McGoldrick’s got that smooth, polished reporter vibe and a cracker of a smile, whereas Courtney Tairi brings the fierce Silver Ferns-athlete energy and that on-court poise.
If you’re into the savvy media-type, Laura might be your pick; if it’s athletic fire and warrior spirit, Courtney ticks the box.
At the end of the day it’s subjective – both are choice in their own right!
 
    Nobody is reading this thread right now.
Back
Top Bottom