Recruitment Warriors 2025/2026 Recruitment & Retention

🤖 AI Summary

📝 Summary:

The forum focuses extensively on the Warriors' 2025/2026 contract situations, recruitment targets, and roster evaluations. Key discussions revolve around Marcelo Montoya's departure to the Tigers #223#230, which fans attribute to backline depth and family considerations, while debating Roger Tuivasa-Sheck's potential shift to wing. Erin Clark's signing as a middle forward #342 generates mixed reactions about his role conversion from hooker. Notable contract concerns include Bunty Afoa's uncertain future #391 and priority re-signings for young talents like Ali Leiataua. Positional debates feature strong opinions about Tohu Harris' reduced role #427, Mitch Barnett's workload management #401, and Jackson Ford's utility value #402. Recruitment speculation highlights interest in Leo Thompson #393#403 amid salary cap constraints. Critical analyses of departing players emerge, including Josh Curran's criticism of Andrew Webster #51#115932 and Jazz Tevaga's emotional exit #437. Fans consistently urge roster upgrades to address goal-kicking deficiencies and spine depth ahead of 2025.

🏷️ Tags:

Player Contracts, Outside Backs, Forward Recruitment

📊 Data Source: Based on ALL posts in thread (total: 9546 posts) | ⏱️ Total Generation Time: 20s
You don't have permission to regenerate AI summary.
Warriors 2025/2026 Recruitment & Retention Discussion
C = Club option, M = Mutual option, P = Player option, S = Supplementary contract, T = Train & Trial contract

Top 30 2025: 30/30
Supplementary 2025: 6/6

Top 30 2026: 26/30
Supplementary 2026: 1/6

2026 Gains: Morgan Gannon (Leeds Rhinos)
2026 Losses: Edward Kosi (South Sydney Rabbitohs)

Off Contract: Bunty Afoa, Tom Ale, Morgan Harper, Te Maire Martin
Can negotiate with other clubs from Nov 1, 2025 (Entering final year) 🐻: Rocco Berry, Tanah Boyd, Kurt Capewell, Chanel Harris-Tavita, Freddy Lussick, Luke Metcalf, Marata Niukore, Taine Tuaupiki, Roger Tuivasa-Sheck



This thread is solely for Warriors recruitment and retention discussion. Any posts not related to the above will be deleted.

Repeat offenders will have their access to this page limited.

Please be mindful of what you are posting in this thread before clicking the reply button. Zero Tolerance for off-topic chat.
 
Last edited:
Interesting thought. I think it's a bit different these days with the way players train and prepare, Tedesco still performs at a high level (albeit not at his obvious physical peak) and RTS is arguably one of the best performing wingers this season. If he was in a better team, he would be a shoe in for Dally M winger of the year you would think.
Yeah but these type of players are a class above.

Dallin is not a class above most wingers.
 

NZWarriors.com

Think it would be disappointing to see the club sign AKP, Sio is coming up nicely and surely either gets the call next year or the year after. And for all the DWZ hate i would probably rather him if thats the replacement.
 
Last edited:
Alofiana Khan-Pereira and TT were electric together in Q Cup. It will add another dimension to our team. It will add significant strike, long range tries will become a thing for the Warriors. It won't improve our defence though, but we've been trying that for along while.
I think the past few weeks have shown Taine isn't going to lead us to a premiership at fullback. Id love AKP to come here though, his defence can't be any worse than Dallin.
 
Think this is the best spot to put this. Apologies if not.

My understanding is the salary cap is a grant distributed by the NRL to the clubs to pay their players. Teams are obligated to spend 97.5% and if they don't they receive some form of monetary fine.

The reason I bring this up is I was talking to someone who is adamant we're 1M under the cap and the club is content with paying a fine which seems an outrageous claim. Yes, Tohu retired, but contracts begin on 'Nov 1st so there's a couple hundred thousand gone before his announcement without even factoring in upgrades and bonuses that have occurred since.

In what world would a club pay money out of their own pockets to the NRL, for the privilege to underspend their grant $ which can't be carried forward anyway? In the same vein how would guys in the playing roster feel if their team spent the bare minimum of 97.5% and $285,000 allocated to the club was left unused?
Here's my potentially tin foil hat theory as to how they've done it.
I suspect they spent the cap when they carried out some of the upgrades by loading on to existing contracts with the players agreeing to reductions for future contracts. Therefore not technically front loading as they are different contracts
For example, here's my hypothetical situation:
Let's say Leka was on an existing 250K per year contract through to the end of 2026 (signed back when he was 17/18).
Then let's say his new contract was going to be worth 850K per year from 2027 to 2029.
But instead of giving him 850K per year for that second contract, both parties agree prior to signing that deal, that they'll reduce it to 650K per year for those 3 years (total reduction of 600K) on the proviso that Leka gets that 600K added to the final 2 years of his existing 2025/2026 contract.
That way we still spend the current years cap, we don't technically front load a contract as they're separate contracts and we have great cap management for those future years.
Plus Leka gets 600K in his pocket sooner than he would have. So it's a win win.
Do that a few times with Laban, Leka, TSS etc to spend the current cap and we've spent the left over money for this year, and set ourselves up with value players for the future.
Hope that makes sense.
 
Here's my potentially tin foil hat theory as to how they've done it.
I suspect they spent the cap when they carried out some of the upgrades by loading on to existing contracts with the players agreeing to reductions for future contracts. Therefore not technically front loading as they are different contracts
For example, here's my hypothetical situation:
Let's say Leka was on an existing 250K per year contract through to the end of 2026 (signed back when he was 17/18).
Then let's say his new contract was going to be worth 850K per year from 2027 to 2029.
But instead of giving him 850K per year for that second contract, both parties agree prior to signing that deal, that they'll reduce it to 650K per year for those 3 years (total reduction of 600K) on the proviso that Leka gets that 600K added to the final 2 years of his existing 2025/2026 contract.
That way we still spend the current years cap, we don't technically front load a contract as they're separate contracts and we have great cap management for those future years.
Plus Leka gets 600K in his pocket sooner than he would have. So it's a win win.
Do that a few times with Laban, Leka, TSS etc to spend the current cap and we've spent the left over money for this year, and set ourselves up with value players for the future.
Hope that makes sense.
This is the best take
 
Here's my potentially tin foil hat theory as to how they've done it.
I suspect they spent the cap when they carried out some of the upgrades by loading on to existing contracts with the players agreeing to reductions for future contracts. Therefore not technically front loading as they are different contracts
For example, here's my hypothetical situation:
Let's say Leka was on an existing 250K per year contract through to the end of 2026 (signed back when he was 17/18).
Then let's say his new contract was going to be worth 850K per year from 2027 to 2029.
But instead of giving him 850K per year for that second contract, both parties agree prior to signing that deal, that they'll reduce it to 650K per year for those 3 years (total reduction of 600K) on the proviso that Leka gets that 600K added to the final 2 years of his existing 2025/2026 contract.
That way we still spend the current years cap, we don't technically front load a contract as they're separate contracts and we have great cap management for those future years.
Plus Leka gets 600K in his pocket sooner than he would have. So it's a win win.
Do that a few times with Laban, Leka, TSS etc to spend the current cap and we've spent the left over money for this year, and set ourselves up with value players for the future.
Hope that makes sense.
Thanks
Is that you Andrew McFadden?
 
The long, lingering questions over the future of Warriors’ playmaker Te Maire Martin have been resolved.
Martin will extend his time at the NRL franchise. The Herald understands the 29-year-old is close to agreeing a one-year extension on his current contract, which will see him remain at the Auckland club... until the end of the 2026 season.
It’s a big retention call by the Warriors, given the amount of halves already on the books. But it’s also recognition of Martin’s impressive versatility, where he has covered multiple positions off the bench and become the preferred No 14 option.
His attitude – and willingness to put the club first in the opening quarter of the season when he was stuck in reserve grade – has also been noticed by the club hierarchy.
It’s quite a turnaround. Earlier this season it looked like Martin would almost certainly depart at the end of this campaign. He missed out to Luke Metcalf and Chanel Harris-Tavita for a spot in the halves, before Newcastle youngster Jye Linnane was signed as a future playmaking option in April, while Jett Cleary was already on the books as a long-term investment.

That led to speculation from Australian media that Martin could even depart mid-season for a Super League deal or possible NRL switch, though coach Andrew Webster was quick to quash any talk of an early release.
Since then, Martin has reinvented himself as a utility. Starting with the round seven match against Brisbane, Martin appeared in 11 of the next 12 matches off the bench and was used at fullback, centre, lock and hooker as well as in the halves, contributing to eight victories.
He enjoyed his first start of the season last week against the Dolphins, before getting the nod again on Saturday, a surprise pick to supplant incumbent No 7 Tanah Boyd. The match turned into a personal nightmare, with Martin leaving the field after just 22 minutes due to concussion. It was later assessed as category one, which will rule him out of Friday’s clash with the Dragons in Auckland (8pm).

Te Maire Martin will stay at the Warriors. Photo / Photosport
Te Maire Martin will stay at the Warriors. Photo / Photosport
Despite that, Martin’s new contract will be a huge fillip, when it looked like he was headed for the exit a few months ago. He had wanted to stay in New Zealand, to be close to family and also given his enjoyment of various outdoor pursuits, notably hunting and fishing. But Martin also would have considered offers from elsewhere if it meant prolonging his professional career. Options would have eventuated, given the shortage of experienced halves across the NRL.
To stay at the Warriors, Martin will have taken a pay cut, given he was signed as a half ahead of the 2023 season, but there were other things to weigh up.

Martin made his first bow in the NRL in round three of the 2016 season, kicking a field goal to help Penrith to a dramatic win over the Broncos in a dream debut. After two seasons at the Panthers, he moved to North Queensland, where he was part of a fairytale run to the grand final from eighth, scoring the Cowboys’ only try in the decider as they were beaten by the Melbourne Storm.
He retired due to medical reasons in 2019, after suffering a brain bleed, before returning three years later via the Broncos, after some time away followed by lower-level league and rugby in New Zealand. Impressive form at Red Hill led to the contract offer with the Warriors, where he has since accumulated 38 matches. Overall, he has notched up 106 NRL games, along with four tests for the Kiwis.
 
Back
Top Bottom