Post Match Storm v Warriors - [Round 2, 2024]

Titans vs Warriors
Titans

Titans

18 - 32
● LIVE
80:00

Cbus Super Stadium

23 Aug 2025

Warriors

Warriors

Match Statistics

Titans Warriors
3 Tries 5
3 / 3 Conversions 6 / 6
0/0 Field Goals 0/0
0/0 2P Field Goals 0/0
3 Try Assists 5
Titans Warriors
46% Possession 54%
29/8 Complete/Incomplete Sets 33/4
37 Time in Opp Half 63
1121m Metres Gained 1471m
3 Line Breaks 4
8 Offloads 13
18/471m Kicks/Metres 24/622m
Titans Warriors
11 Errors 7
4 Penalties Conceded 7
2 Set Restarts 4
38 Missed Tackles 33

Player Statistics

Titans Players
# Player T Pts TA LB TB Off Tkl MT IT Pos DH K KM M E P
1 A. Brimson 0 0 2 1 7 1 7 1 0 44 0 3 30m 88m 0 0
2 J. De Groot 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 16 0 0 0m 39m 1 0
3 B. Kelly 1 4 0 1 3 2 18 7 1 16 0 0 0m 91m 1 0
4 J. Fifita 0 0 0 0 2 0 11 1 3 19 0 0 0m 59m 1 1
5 P. Sami 0 0 0 0 2 2 3 0 1 15 0 0 0m 102m 2 0
6 K. Foran 0 0 0 0 2 0 20 5 0 28 0 2 24m 20m 0 1
7 J. Campbell 0 6 0 0 3 0 20 4 1 45 0 13 417m 83m 1 0
8 M. Fotuaika 0 0 0 0 1 0 23 1 2 9 0 0 0m 74m 1 0
9 S. Verrills 0 0 1 0 0 0 56 4 2 92 1 0 0m 9m 1 0
10 R. Campbell-Gillard 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 1 0 11 0 0 0m 70m 0 0
11 C. Randall 0 0 0 0 1 0 36 3 2 9 0 0 0m 55m 0 1
12 B. Fermor 1 4 0 0 6 1 29 4 3 19 0 0 0m 99m 2 0
13 T. Fa'asuamaleaui 1 4 0 1 5 0 45 2 2 18 0 0 0m 119m 1 0
14 K. Kini 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 8 0 0 0m 38m 0 0
15 K. Haas 0 0 0 0 0 1 21 1 1 9 0 0 0m 70m 0 1
16 I. Fa'asuamaleaui 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 1 2 7 0 0 0m 52m 0 0
17 J. Patston 0 0 0 0 0 1 9 0 1 5 0 0 0m 53m 0 0
Warriors Players
# Player T Pts TA LB TB Off Tkl MT IT Pos DH K KM M E P
1 C. Nicoll-Klokstad 0 0 0 0 2 0 8 0 0 38 2 0 0m 160m 1 0
2 D. Watene-Zelezniak 0 0 0 0 1 0 5 1 0 13 0 0 0m 111m 0 0
3 A. Pompey 1 4 1 0 4 1 17 0 0 12 0 0 0m 84m 0 0
4 R. Berry 0 0 0 0 4 1 10 1 1 16 0 0 0m 107m 1 0
5 R. Tuivasa-Sheck 2 8 0 2 8 0 3 1 0 23 0 0 0m 209m 0 0
6 C. Harris-Tavita 0 0 1 0 1 2 18 2 0 45 1 8 218m 57m 1 0
7 T. Boyd 0 12 1 0 3 0 14 7 1 61 0 15 397m 42m 0 0
8 J. Fisher-Harris 0 0 0 0 3 0 34 4 0 19 0 0 0m 122m 1 1
9 W. Egan 0 0 1 0 0 0 19 0 1 74 4 0 0m 29m 0 0
16 T. Stowers-Smith 0 0 0 0 3 2 16 3 2 11 0 0 0m 67m 2 0
11 K. Capewell 0 0 0 0 0 1 29 4 3 13 0 0 0m 73m 1 1
12 M. Niukore 1 4 0 1 4 0 21 3 2 11 0 0 0m 71m 0 2
13 E. Clark 0 0 0 0 2 2 27 1 0 18 0 0 0m 90m 0 1
10 D. Vaimauga 0 0 0 0 0 3 21 1 0 12 0 0 0m 79m 0 2
14 T. Martin 0 0 1 0 0 1 17 3 1 44 1 1 7m 5m 0 0
15 E. Ieremia-Toeava 1 4 0 1 1 0 20 1 2 16 0 0 0m 125m 0 0
17 L. Halasima 0 0 0 0 2 0 13 1 0 5 1 0 0m 40m 0 0

Rate the game?

  • A+

  • A

  • B

  • C

  • F#[&!!!


Results are only viewable after voting.
Heartbreaking loss. Still, the Warriors had a better start last year and didn’t get to the grand final, so maybe this year is different. One question about the second to last Storm try. Katoa looked like he took out two players and opening up a hole for the try. Wasn’t that obstruction?
 

NZWarriors.com

And I can live with that- I’m just pointing out how close it was- anyone without an agenda (inruin) would agree- instead she just gives everything a laugh emoji 🙄
There is nothing to debate. The laugh emoji is there to use. And I do because it's funny. It's funny because you use a still frame as 'proof' when there is slow motion video available which clearly show it as a try.

You have gone from no try to it's close. Everyone has said it's close, but it's also a try. Not actually sure what point you are trying to make at this stage. But hey, carry on claiming it is whatever you think it is.
 
Just look at frame 1 of the 3 that has already been posted. That's all you need. If you can't see it clearly enough from it, dare I say you may need to visit an optometrist on Monday. It was close but it's also clearly a try.

Serious question - how much have you and your storm mate who agrees with your still that it's inconclusive have drunk so far? 😆
Lots- we had a hangi today and yes I do need glasses but I put them on and that first photo clearly shows his hand is out- wtf u looking at??
 
There is nothing to debate. The laugh emoji is there to use. And I do because it's funny. It's funny because you use a still frame as 'proof' when there is slow motion video available which clearly show it as a try.

You have gone from no try to it's close. Everyone has said it's close, but it's also a try. Not actually sure what point you are trying to make at this stage. But hey, carry on claiming it is whatever you think it is.
Well u can’t get better proof than a farkin photo- where’s your proof that it’s conclusive? Go on….
 
Back
Top Bottom