Post Match Storm v Warriors - [Round 2, 2024]

Storm vs Warriors

Storm

28 - 26

MATCH COMPLETE

AAMI Park

16 Mar 2024

Warriors

Match Stats

Storm Warriors
5 Tries 4
4 / 5 Conversions 5 / 7
0/1 Field Goals 0/0
1/1 2P Field Goals 0/0
5 Try Assists 5
Storm Warriors
51% Possession 49%
8 / 28 Set Completion 8 / 29
49 Time in Opposition Half 51
1235 Metres Gained 1516
0 Dropouts 3
10 Dummy Half Runs 1
21 / 642 Kicks/Kick Metres 18 / 490
0 40/20 0
0 20/40 0
8 Offloads 9
0 1 on 1 Steals 0
7 Line Breaks 4
5 Line Break Assists 4
0 Support Play 0
Storm Warriors
8 / 28 Set Completion 8 / 29
8 Penalties (Conceded) 4
1 Set Restarts 3
7 Errors 9

Player Stats

# Storm T Pts TA LB TB OFF Ta MT IT Pos DR K KM M E P
1 R. Papenhuyzen 2 8 0 2 6 4 2 1 0 19 2 2 21m 140m 1 1
2 W. Warbrick 1 4 0 0 2 0 2 1 0 12 1 0 0m 116m 0 0
3 R. Smith 0 0 1 1 1 0 6 3 0 18 0 0 0m 87m 0 1
4 N. Meaney 1 12 0 0 1 0 12 3 0 9 0 0 0m 115m 0 0
5 X. Coates 1 4 0 1 3 0 4 2 0 16 0 0 0m 50m 1 0
6 J. Pezet 0 0 0 0 1 2 8 2 0 26 1 7 242m 21m 2 0
7 J. Hughes 0 0 2 2 8 0 14 2 0 34 0 9 284m 95m 0 0
8 T. Kamikamica 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 1 0 8 0 0 0m 83m 0 2
9 H. Grant 0 0 0 1 3 0 37 3 0 10 6 3 95m 58m 1 2
10 J. King 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 1 0 11 0 0 0m 75m 0 0
11 J. Chan 0 0 1 0 1 0 25 2 0 12 0 0 0m 76m 0 1
12 E. Katoa 0 0 1 0 2 1 24 3 0 10 0 0 0m 73m 0 0
13 T. Loiero 0 0 0 0 1 0 28 4 0 14 0 0 0m 106m 0 1
14 T. Wishart 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 4 0 0 0m 36m 0 0
15 C. Welch 0 0 0 0 0 1 11 0 0 3 0 0 0m 31m 0 0
16 C. Lewis 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 1 0 5 0 0 0m 35m 0 0
17 A. MacDonald 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 0 0 6 0 0 0m 38m 2 0
19 K. Bradley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0m 0m 0 0
# Warriors T Pts TA LB TB OFF Ta MT IT Pos DR K KM M E P
1 T. Tuaupiki 0 0 1 0 5 0 2 0 0 30 0 0 0m 165m 2 0
2 D. Watene-Zelezniak 2 8 0 2 6 2 6 4 0 16 0 0 0m 188m 0 0
3 R. Berry 0 0 1 0 2 0 21 1 0 14 0 0 0m 119m 0 1
4 R. Tuivasa-Sheck 0 0 1 1 5 3 17 1 0 15 0 0 0m 156m 1 0
5 M. Montoya 1 4 0 1 3 0 4 1 0 18 0 0 0m 116m 2 0
6 L. Metcalf 0 10 1 0 1 0 12 2 0 14 0 1 12m 38m 1 0
7 S. Johnson 0 0 1 0 0 0 13 3 0 36 0 17 478m 0m 1 1
8 A. Fonua-Blake 0 0 0 0 1 2 19 0 0 12 0 0 0m 145m 0 0
14 F. Lussick 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 4 0 2 1 0 0m 7m 0 1
10 M. Barnett 0 0 0 0 0 1 20 1 0 12 0 0 0m 104m 0 0
11 J. Ford 1 4 0 0 4 0 30 3 0 10 0 0 0m 78m 0 1
12 K. Capewell 0 0 0 0 0 1 30 4 0 9 0 0 0m 53m 1 0
13 T. Harris 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 4 0 13 0 0 0m 108m 0 0
15 T. Ale 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 5 0 0 0m 62m 0 0
16 B. Afoa 0 0 0 0 2 0 14 1 0 8 0 0 0m 83m 0 0
17 D. Walker 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 10 0 0 0m 94m 1 0
23 C. Harris-Tavita 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0m 0m 0 0
20 J. Tevaga 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0m 0m 0 0
 

Rate the game?

  • A+

  • A

  • B

  • C

  • F#[&!!!


Results are only viewable after voting.
Heartbreaking loss. Still, the Warriors had a better start last year and didn’t get to the grand final, so maybe this year is different. One question about the second to last Storm try. Katoa looked like he took out two players and opening up a hole for the try. Wasn’t that obstruction?
 
NZWarriors.com
NZWarriors.com
Advertisement
If you would like to remove these advertisements, please do so by registering a free account
And I can live with that- I’m just pointing out how close it was- anyone without an agenda (inruin) would agree- instead she just gives everything a laugh emoji 🙄
There is nothing to debate. The laugh emoji is there to use. And I do because it's funny. It's funny because you use a still frame as 'proof' when there is slow motion video available which clearly show it as a try.

You have gone from no try to it's close. Everyone has said it's close, but it's also a try. Not actually sure what point you are trying to make at this stage. But hey, carry on claiming it is whatever you think it is.
 
NZWarriors.com
Advertisement
If you would like to remove these advertisements, please do so by registering a free account
NZWarriors.com
Advertisement
If you would like to remove these advertisements, please do so by registering a free account
Just look at frame 1 of the 3 that has already been posted. That's all you need. If you can't see it clearly enough from it, dare I say you may need to visit an optometrist on Monday. It was close but it's also clearly a try.

Serious question - how much have you and your storm mate who agrees with your still that it's inconclusive have drunk so far? 😆
Lots- we had a hangi today and yes I do need glasses but I put them on and that first photo clearly shows his hand is out- wtf u looking at??
 
NZWarriors.com
Advertisement
If you would like to remove these advertisements, please do so by registering a free account
NZWarriors.com
Advertisement
If you would like to remove these advertisements, please do so by registering a free account
There is nothing to debate. The laugh emoji is there to use. And I do because it's funny. It's funny because you use a still frame as 'proof' when there is slow motion video available which clearly show it as a try.

You have gone from no try to it's close. Everyone has said it's close, but it's also a try. Not actually sure what point you are trying to make at this stage. But hey, carry on claiming it is whatever you think it is.
Well u can’t get better proof than a farkin photo- where’s your proof that it’s conclusive? Go on….
 
NZWarriors.com
Advertisement
If you would like to remove these advertisements, please do so by registering a free account
Back
Top