There’s drunk and there’s rugby league drunk. Not like these shandy drinking soccer softshites
NRL NRL Naughty chair
- Thread starter bringinthebulls
- Start date
NZWarriors.com
To quote The Wire: "Is you taking notes on a criminal fucking conspiracy?"
It's fair to say sportsfolk don't end up being referred to as "Criminal Masterminds" or said as "he was the brains in the criminal organisation".
Walsh was there!! The funniest part is he tried to tackle them!! Why start now New vision reveals two more Broncos involved in drunken post-fan day scuffle
New vision reveals two more Broncos involved in drunken post-fan day scuffle
www.foxsports.com.au
NZWarriors.com
If you would like to remove these advertisements, please do so by registering a free account
John Nick
Contributor
Walsh & Haas .
New vision reveals two more Broncos involved in drunken post-fan day scuffle
New vision reveals two more Broncos involved in drunken post-fan day scuffle
No surprises there Jonesy!!
NZWarriors.com
If you would like to remove these advertisements, please do so by registering a free account
Tragic
Contributor
They are all fuckheads on there to be fair, I liked ikin better than Anyone on there now. Buzz is about the best, so that says a hell of a lot.
Stereo and Fats left a big hole.
He didn't get convicted so it's fair enough he is allowed back. There may still be a lot of criticism coming his way, he will have to deal with that. Fox as well for bringing him back.
The main thing is will he be humbled by it?
Or will he hold back on sticking the boot in to players when they are accused of something?
The answer to both questions may be yes. But the follow up question would be to both. For how long?
The history of the show is quite funny. A host moves on, it seems weird. You then get used to it and think it would be weird going back.
The hosting does have a weird dynamic with an ex player typically being the host and asking a journalist as the sort of expert co host. Then the main other guests are journalists before players, ex players or coaches come in briefly.
Tallis got off to a slow start where he barely said anything. He did find his place. It was good having another ex player on there.
The main thing is will he be humbled by it?
Or will he hold back on sticking the boot in to players when they are accused of something?
The answer to both questions may be yes. But the follow up question would be to both. For how long?
The history of the show is quite funny. A host moves on, it seems weird. You then get used to it and think it would be weird going back.
The hosting does have a weird dynamic with an ex player typically being the host and asking a journalist as the sort of expert co host. Then the main other guests are journalists before players, ex players or coaches come in briefly.
Tallis got off to a slow start where he barely said anything. He did find his place. It was good having another ex player on there.
NZWarriors.com
If you would like to remove these advertisements, please do so by registering a free account
Nice to see Titans actually get punished for hair pulling. Wouldn't have happened if they did it to a Warriors player though.
I thought there was rule that hair below the collar was fair game? I didn't think it was intentional.
Nice to see Titans actually get punished for hair pulling. Wouldn't have happened if they did it to a Warriors player though.
Titans defended well regardless.
Not sure haha who knows with some of the NRLs rulings, I think if it's accidental should be fine but if intentional should be a penalty.
Zyon Maiu’u facing a 4-5 game ban as well for his high shot.
NRL Judiciary Report: Kiwi games counted in NAS ban
Storm prop Nelson Asofa-Solomona will only miss one game at the start of the 2025 season after it was ruled that three of New Zealand's Pac Champs game would count as part of his ban.
www.nrl.com
NZWarriors.com
If you would like to remove these advertisements, please do so by registering a free account
If it's not the rule currently, it should be
Bay39er
Contributor
Why?
So, If your opponent is less than 150cm in height and you shoulder him to the head a la Zyon Maiu’u then that is not foul play?
John Nick
Contributor
We have enough rules now that are hard to interpret. Why add more.
Then we will have refs etc measuring the length of players hair before kick off.
Do we carry this into the women's game.
Stupid stuff
NZWarriors.com
If you would like to remove these advertisements, please do so by registering a free account
Unsure what you are trying to say and how it relates to a player having long hair?
John Nick
Contributor
Is the length assessed with the head leaning forward or backwards. Officials have a hard enough time now. They don't need more
Rick O’Shay
Contributor
I'm bald so I get a free ticket
NZWarriors.com
If you would like to remove these advertisements, please do so by registering a free account
John Nick
Contributor
Last edited:
Rick O’Shay
Contributor
Just had a vision of going into the first tackle and the wig coming adrift. Would that be a sending off?Get a wig.
