barnett.webp

Player Mitch Barnett

Date of Birth
Apr 15, 1994
Birth Location
Taree, New South Wales, Australia
Nationality
  1. 🇦🇺 Australia
Height (cm)
187 cm
Weight (kg)
104 kg
Position/s
  1. Prop
  2. Second Row
  3. Lock
Nickname
Barny
Warrior #
275
NRL Debut Date
Aug 10, 2015
NRL Debut Details
2015, Round 22, Canberra Raiders vs Wests Tigers
Warriors Debut Date
Mar 3, 2023
Warriors Debut Details
March 3 2023, Round 1 vs Newcastle Knights at SKY Stadium, Wellington, New Zealand
Warriors Years Active
  1. 2023
  2. 2024
  3. 2025
Signed From
Newcastle Knights
Junior Club/s
Wingham Tigers
Previous Club/s
Canberra Raiders, Newcastle Knights
Rep Honours
  1. Australia
  2. NSW (SOO)
Awards/Honours
  1. Warriors Captain
  2. Warriors Player of the Year
Status
Active
Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitchell_Barnett
Rugby League Project
https://www.rugbyleagueproject.org/players/mitchell-barnett/summary.html
Well im arguing that they could have rested him not that origin and the turnaround caused the injury.

Again I am not saying this was why he got injured, its more from a point of view that we didn't need to play him. Add in the hectic away schedule the warriors have had also.

I get webby loves thrashing the good ones.
We have two byes in quick succession coming up. It would be extremely rare if a player was 'rested' prior to that. And i dont understand the point that just because he didnt play many mins that 'we didnt need him'. Who is to say his replacement didnt leave a gaping hole or dropped the ball in the initial mins that handed Raiders points/ascendency which could have led to a different result. We only won by 6 points.
 
I should really phrase that differently, should webby have given barney the week off?

I think the answer from most people is still going to be no. Really this doesn't have anything to do with Webby, as I would almost guarentee that if Barney wanted the week off, it would have been given to him.

Sadly, just one of those freak happenings with no one to blame.

Although, I did see them mention on Levels podcast, that Barney shifted himself to prevent injuring an opposition player and did his ACL that way. Not sure how true that is, but really annoying if it's the case.
 
This injury to Mitch Barnett is a mark against Webster in this instance.

Did we need Barnett to play on sunday? Turned out we didn't in the end, so im sure webby will learn from this. Barnett didn't need to back up when we are going well, a little game management here should have happened.
Disagree completely. Yes we did need Barnett to play - the vast majority of other SOO players also backed up.

And certainly Mitch would have been jumping out of his skin to get out there.

Watch the incident again, Webster wasn't actually on the field. Pretty sure you'll find it was the collision.

We were coming off a loss against the Raiders, it was a statement game.

Damn I should have read the rest of the posts :)
 
Yeah I don't see how he wouldn't play so no issue with that

Are we all completely sure fatigue had zero impact? I get it that done things like muscle strains are overtly more fatigue linked but if your muscles are knackered then maybe it's harder/ less likely you can brace yourself in collision?

A part of me just can't completely rule out that a battered and tired body / mind makes for an increased chance of these things
 
Yeah I don't see how he wouldn't play so no issue with that

Are we all completely sure fatigue had zero impact? I get it that done things like muscle strains are overtly more fatigue linked but if your muscles are knackered then maybe it's harder/ less likely you can brace yourself in collision?

A part of me just can't completely rule out that a battered and tired body / mind makes for an increased chance of these things
Potentially was a factor but that’s sport.

Do we start sitting out players if we have a 5 day turnaround game? After long flights? Towards the end of the season?

If a player is injured early in a game and your asking another player to play long extra minutes it’s probably a worse fatigue and injury risk than what Barnett was asked to do.
 
Back
Top Bottom