For what it’s worth my understanding of how all this went goes like this…
First of all u have to understand that playing halfback in this team is considered a plum job- u have a great coach, get to play behind a great pack which just keeps getting stronger, u get to play on the ball and get a lot of good ball in good spots.
Metcalf and his team knew that and he actually knocked back bigger offers to stay with us with the understanding that he was going to be our pin up number 7 marquee man and he was always expected to come straight back into that 7 jersey once fit.
However once fit he was asked to play 6 but reassured he was still the long term 7.
He gets injured again and when he returns is a bit blindsided to be named on the extended bench- and this time when he asked for reassurance he’s told the goal posts have moved and they want him to play 6 outside
Boyd moving forward.
In his and his management’s mind he is a better player than
Boyd and I tend to agree with that- the thing is being the better player and the better fit for the team is not always the same thing.
Boyd knows the benefits of playing in a strong system better than anyone coming through the ranks of keebra playing behind one of the best junior packs ever assembled only to struggle at the titans in a poor side which is why he was also willing to knock back bigger offers from rival clubs to stay here where he knows he can play his best footy.
Metcalfs camp on the other hand are thinking this isn’t what they signed up for and his best chance of playing his best footy might be in another system which came with the added bonus of moving the family home.
I don’t really see a bad guy in all of this- all 3 parties had a decision to make and made it
The greatest thing is we had two quality halfbacks both willing to take unders to get the job- that’s a testament to what the club have built in the last few years.