yeah i did do a mind game press conference targetting him and was successful in dropping his fitness level. Thought he was a bit of a danger for you and then surprised you didnt play him at all lol
I did do defense training session. I refer back to previous playing the programmer commentsAs coach you should try to run some defensive tackling sessions. I can understand why you were wooing @ShaunJohnson7 as an assistant coach now. Maybe he can help guide both you and @wizard of Tauranga
Barnett prob thought 'fuck it, these losers dont know how to kick so ill do it myself'.
Im just surprised that you you are suprised at the result thinking you would have beaten me in the first place lol
So how much of an issue is fitness? I just thought 70% was an issue but maybe its not.
Read the FAQ.
Well considering the adversity you have programmed against me I'm surprised you are taking any pride in that result
its weird that you think i needed any help to beat you. I mean...look at where you are on the ladder. Its not like that this is your first loss. Surely you would have learnt something from your first loss? No?
Close loss against a quality team away from home i can take and accept......
yeah agreed. it was utter dominance.
do you and wizard breathe the same air or something? I answered the question just earlier
Oh, breathing. Good suggestion.
You’d think there’d be direct flights between North Korea & Fiji aye
Flights? The home team covers only boat rides for visiting teams. I hope you dont follow up by asking about the accomodation we have organised for you guys.
btw i just looked through our game.
Every scheduled fixture has a weather forecast that becomes more accurate as game day approaches. You see it in two places:
The forecast tightens as kickoff approaches, mirroring real weather forecasting:
Behind the scenes, each fixture has a locked "true" weather assigned when the round is drawn. The sim will always play the game in that true weather — what tightens is the forecast display, not the reality.
Wrong forecasts are "close" wrong, not wildly wrong. A rainy day is far more often mispredicted as "light rain" or "cloudy" than as "fine", just like real-world forecasts. So even at long range when the forecast is least reliable, the direction of the forecast gives you meaningful signal — if it says wet, it's more likely to actually be wet than dry.
Game plans can be submitted right up until kickoff, so you don't have to commit early. Later is better. A forecast you see several days out is speculative — by the final day, it's much more trustworthy, and within a few hours of kickoff it's essentially locked in. If you're agonising over whether to pick a wet-weather roster early in the week, the safer play is to wait and re-check the forecast closer to gameday before finalising.
Even with an accurate forecast, the engine can still shift the weather at half-time (or, less often, mid-half). It's uncommon but not rare. The forecast predicts the starting weather, not necessarily the whole match.
Transitions are stepped. Heavy rain never jumps straight to fine — the graph is rain → light rain → damp → fine. Damp is a wet-pitch residual state: no falling rain, but the surface and ball are still slick. So a forecast of "rain" is never wasted: even if the rain stops at halftime, the second half will still play in light rain or damp conditions, not back to a perfect track. The post-match summary shows both halves' weather (e.g. "Rain → Damp") so you can see exactly what was played in.
If you're building a wet-weather specialist bench, a fine-forecast game isn't a complete waste — there's always a small chance the match shifts conditions.
