Devils advocate. Is there a point where we discuss durability?
Obviously, Tanah is an unknown variable in this area, so there's not enough info to make a decent conclusion. But Metcalf has had a pretty rough injury record (three season enders in a row).
Before we do the usual overreaction pile on, chill. I want Metcalf as our 7. I just wonder if we're always going to have one eye on his backup, so long as he is playing here
He's a bit of a 'glass cannon', so to speak.
I don't really have an emotional attachment to any of them
CHT/
Metcalf/
Boyd - I mean I like all three guys, heck I like all of our players, but I do not feel a fondness for one say over another.
Quite honestly I do not give a shit who plays where. If
Webster turns
Metcalf and
CHT into premiership winners then I want that combo.
But here is the thing, if the Warriors backline was largely dependent on Metcalfs individual brilliance as a dynamic
SJ style 7 (hey that's great) and
CHT playing a foil (and doing so admirably)......why couldn't those two put forty points on Competition heavy weights back to back? (and yes the Roosters played a terrible game of ill discipline, but a week later we now know that "Yes the Warriors are the real deal").
The reason is that
Metcalf and
CHT as a combo do not construct side line to side line width of the park football - when compared with
Boyd and
CHT -
Boyd and
Egan -
Boyd and
CNK....
Boyd and the ball boy.....is
Boyd.
So what is
Boyd doing that has changed our attack (I have already gone on enough someone can add more layers) but a crucial part of it is he and
Egan have forwards coming onto good ball and
Boyd is using a lot passing in a very conventional, traditional distributors fashion (just saying here that he uses easy to read short passes for his hole runners or he goes out the back with a simple pass).
And the other thing is his timing, he runs onto the pass, meaning he stands a little deep, runs straight at the passing lane then lets the ball go early, rather than drifting like a speed guy like
Metcalf or
SJ will tend to do while also often catching the ball standing flat footed,
Boyd will just go a couple or three steps direct and let it go - now every traditional half back does this right? there is nothing special in it...nothing Xfactor or fancy...but that is EXACTLY why we are seeing 40 pointers, because our guys all grew up running off standard simple organizers, not "shit what is he gonna do now" type halfbacks.
And so you see all our players coming into play, you see ball movement, no round 1-6 clunkiness.
And
Boyd even does this with his kicking game, he set up the simplest cleanest grubber for
Leka specifically, rather than try get an rolling end on end unpredictable 'bouncer' or a typical diagonal angle changing grubber aimed towards the post - and look at his kicks to the edges in the air, they are not for one player, they are low, slow, easy to tap back by anyone (distance is key he kicks short of the line meaning our guys can compete and create second phase whereas convention tells you you should put it on the try line for a catch and score).
Convention, consistency, stability the hallmarks of a lead playmaker. Hey lets not forget these high scoring Warriors are the same backline that everyone lamented for three seasons as not being good enough "where are our points coming from" "
CNK is too Vanilla" "we lack speed"
I went on a rant lets cut the fat, the waffle and bullshit and ask ourselves, if you were picking a premiership winning combo out of our options does
Metcalf and
CHT leap out at you as this is it? this is our year?
Does
Tanah Boyd and
Metcalf?.........maybe.....