I dunno but I suspect Duke might have a not very well hidden agenda against people with inferior genes like yours and mineOf course it is. Pro black is alright isn’t it? Pro Jew is alright isn’t it?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I dunno but I suspect Duke might have a not very well hidden agenda against people with inferior genes like yours and mineOf course it is. Pro black is alright isn’t it? Pro Jew is alright isn’t it?
And people can have their own opinions on race mixing, he’s hardly the only one. Lots of ethnic parents want the kids to marry the same.I dunno but I suspect Duke might have a not very well hidden agenda against people with inferior genes like yours
KKK ideology advocates violence and ethnic cleansing though, did he mention that?And people can have their own opinions on race mixing, he’s hardly the only one. Lots of ethnic parents want the kids to marry the same.
I AM mixed race, so I had a default position, but race actually does matter. Ask any parent that’s had a kid with needing bone marrow transplant. I was race-pilled after that.
Wow that’s a first. No one has ever advocated for those two things before.KKK ideology advocates violence and ethnic cleansing though, did he mention that?
No not a first, more like the default standard of our species. Shouldn't we be trying to move past that?Wow that’s a first. No one has ever advocated for those two things before.
I’ve seen that from the radical fringe of TPM.
It's turned into the twilight of democracy thread, Bruce saw this coming.Well this has taken a turn. Admiration for Putin and David Duke
Fact - they're not even hiding mateOk, all the ‘Trumps in it for Trump’; ‘Trumps making himself rich’; ‘by the rich, for the rich’ people.
How do we explain that Trump was poorer after his first presidency than before?
Facts and history before conspiracy theories:
![]()
Donald Trump's wealth takes tumble during presidency - BBC News
The former US president's fortune slipped to $2.3bn according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index.www.bbc.com
Poor @tajhayIt's turned into the twilight of democracy thread, Bruce saw this coming.
Because there needs to be separation between state and church and not beliefs pushed upon peopleWatched the first 30 seconds.
Are you shocked the US is a Christian country and been patriotically that was as long as I’ve known it?
It’s not even a Trump thing - just look at the abortion debate. The US is one of the most deeply religious western countries and who are we to say they are wrong?
But dont people vote based in part on their religious beliefs? Especially the US politicians always reference god and lean on religion in their campaigning.Because there needs to be separation between state and church and not beliefs pushed upon people
No I don’t think so. Though America tends to be overall a fairly religious place, it’s only really through the bible belt that there’s a fanatical view around it and it takes precedence over their entire lives. Think that’s how trump likes to demonise California for their lack of religious values to conduct their lives under. Would say the Pacific islands, take your pick of which one would be among the most religious in terms if Christianity with Sunday coming to a complete standstillBut dont people vote based in part on their religious beliefs? Especially the US politicians always reference god and lean on religion in their campaigning.
I would say that’s more just the moral religious fabric of the people coming through in their politics rather than any direct tie in to the church (ie the church active in politics).
Each country has a culture that is normalised and the US is based on their religious fundamentals. Even NZ has rules based on our western culture that other cultures would find weird (taboo subjects, public nudity, etc)
Philosophically, for debate, aren’t issues like LGBT, abortion, lowering speed limits, etc people pushing their beliefs in others? They are not black and white supported by data as both sides can build a case. Aren’t all politics really pushing beliefs?
If the majority of people are christian or the country has been largely founded on that, then shouldn't the state reflect that? And if the majority are Christian why does a country have to fundamentally change what they are about. Similarly a predominantly muslim country is going to be lead by those values and culture. Is it a bit like buying a house next to Eden Park then complaining about the noise?Because there needs to be separation between state and church and not beliefs pushed upon people
As far as I'm concerned the real war is this:Disagree mate. We're drowning in disinformation and concerted efforts in the last 15 years to break down community and peaceful cooperation. This is deliberate and it's worked.
People like us? That sounds like nationalist, populist whatever.
That way leads to war and destruction. This isn't fate. This is deliberate fascism.
timingAs far as I'm concerned the real war is this:
What is Disinformation? What is Misinformation?
We can yell these each other "You're MISINFORMED!", "You're DISINFORMED!" and can tie those words to the media/social media that we choose to watch/believe in.
The core of language is definition and it's very easy to change a word's definition to make it mean what you want it to mean.
I know people who genuinely believe that schools are putting out catty litters to cater for Furries on the basis that they identify as being cats. Nope. They're just roleplaying. Yes, they're most likely somewhere on the LGBT spectrum/side, but they are not claiming to be cats. This, however, upsets these people badly.
I agree, this is deliberate, whether you call it facism or not. People are voting for this. Making a deliberate decision about this.
I’m not saying they need to change what they are about, but I don’t think the state needs to enforce such views. America was founded on slavery too, but times change and I don’t see why there’s a need to go back to times where views are forced. If you want to willingly participate, no problem but it almost feels like the push for people to bring Christianity into their lives is trying to paint a picture that the world was a much better place when many were devout but there were also many hypocrites who thought turning up to church on Sunday forgave them of all the shit things they did that week. I remember in the 80’s when Christian’s were up in arms about heavy metal being the devils music such extremes they go to that the industry embraced it. Then you get the likes of Bali making it illegal to have sex out of wedlock, so just how far does their reach encroach on our lives?If the majority of people are christian or the country has been largely founded on that, then shouldn't the state reflect that? And if the majority are Christian why does a country have to fundamentally change what they are about. Similarly a predominantly muslim country is going to be lead by those values and culture. Is it a bit like buying a house next to Eden Park then complaining about the noise?
Thats complete nonsense that ignores the history of every nationality involved.America was founded on slavery too,