Isnβt this implying that taxes arenβt linked to spending because the govt can spend what it likes and generate new money?
Taxes still need to roughly equal money produced over the long term therefore taxes constrain money produced in an indirect way?
Otherwise debt is accumulated resulting in higher interest costs, inflation and NZ$ falling affecting imports and exports.
Therefore taxes arent everything but very linked to what a govt con spend.
Yes, but the govt does not = the economy. Govt should run counter cyclical to the economy.
If the economy is already tight - Government competes for workers, construction materials, machinery, imports, etc. That pushes up wages, prices and project costs.
In effect govts compete with private businesses and private businesses may scale back when govts spend/ costs rise. This is real world crowding out of resources via financial govt spending.
Eg govt after Covid ramped up spending by borrowing massively and spending, smashing businesses - everyone remembers the dire lack of labour then (businesses closing for lack of available staff). This is a real world example of your focus on productive capacity.
This period highlights why the Greens budget to spending $22b a year extra canβt be met by the resources in the economy? The focus should be on growing the pie, productivity, education, etc.
Grow and spend not tax and spend?