He was a pretty good rugby player, remember him in the Uni team at Auckland in the 70's. Was a back but can't remember where exactly. Maybe a half, he's pretty short lol
Must have been all the Rothmans smoked back then
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He was a pretty good rugby player, remember him in the Uni team at Auckland in the 70's. Was a back but can't remember where exactly. Maybe a half, he's pretty short lol
There's no bounty, that'll be why he's running amok..
Eh? Explain furtherThere's no bounty, that'll be why he's running amok..
Played centre for the University team and iirc NZ māori. I have played against him and he was a moaning hua back then.He was a pretty good rugby player, remember him in the Uni team at Auckland in the 70's. Was a back but can't remember where exactly. Maybe a half, he's pretty short lol
Must have been all the Rothmans smoked back then
Yes, that's why I remembered him. I may have played against you back in the day JN. Played for Uni and College Rifles.Played centre for the University team and iirc NZ Maori. I have played against him and he was a moaning hua back then.
Not sure what goes on there, that was a Brightman post, not mineEh? Explain further
Yeah mate. Did a season with Eden and my tackling technique hasn't changed much since then.Yes, that's why I remembered him. I may have played against you back in the day JN. Played for Uni and College Rifles.
Were you that guy that played for Suburbs that had the Kamikazi tackle?
Yeah saw that, weirdNot sure what goes on there, that was a Brightman post, not mine
It was a comment in jest, the campaign poster draws similarities to a "Wanted dead or alive" poster but without the bounty..Eh? Explain further
NiceIt was a comment in jest, the campaign poster draws similarities to a "Wanted dead or alive" poster but without the bounty..
He didn’t read the article again. This is about fraud and white collar fraudsters, nothing to do with wealthy and corporates and tax avoidance.Did you read that article.
Jesus wept. Chelsea needs to go back to school to learn how to write an article that makes sense. She certainly doesn't understand tax avoidance versus fraud. One of which is perfectly legal, the other is illegal. Maybe she got confused about Tax evasion.
My accountant gets paid a fair whack of cash to avoid me and my trusts paying any unnecessary tax to the idiots in Wellington to waste. Fraudulent activities on the other hand can be and are investigated by IRD. Going through one of their audits is thorough.
I suspect it's the same for other businesses, corporations and trusts on either side of the great divide.
It’s funny how the article was actually referencing dodgy business practises 25 years ago, and then talks about internet scammers.Did you read that article.
Jesus wept. Chelsea needs to go back to school to learn how to write an article that makes sense. She certainly doesn't understand tax avoidance versus fraud. One of which is perfectly legal, the other is illegal. Maybe she got confused about Tax evasion.
My accountant gets paid a fair whack of cash to avoid me and my trusts paying any unnecessary tax to the idiots in Wellington to waste. Fraudulent activities on the other hand can be and are investigated by IRD. Going through one of their audits is thorough.
I suspect it's the same for other businesses, corporations and trusts on either side of the great divide.
Your may think your Robin Hood but you missed your target bro. The article was about fraud which everyone doesn’t like, not tax avoidance.It's so heart warming that the rich have the right wingers on here to defend them rather than actually obey the law and pay their share.
Gosh, they're so hard done by.
Yes, I did. So, my comprehension is pretty good.Defensive Bomb: The article says: View attachment 15856
And for the defender of the rich from Tauranga
View attachment 15857
DID YOU READ THE ARTICLE?