From an earlier RadioNZ article, they only included two age demographics....
www.rnz.co.nz
www.abc.net.au
Who's fault is it that they're obese yet under-nourished? Neoliberals.Globally kids now more likely to be obese than starving. Dam capitalism and its abundance
Finding of more obese yet malnourished kids reignites junk food debate
UNICEF says more children are now overweight and under-nourished than too thin, stirring fresh calls by health experts and farming bodies to tax ultra-processed food producers.
sounds like something a communist would say before seizing the methods of production
I think Top8's gone on holiday, probably on his private island watching his Julie Andrews collection
It’s been suspiciously calm here… It feel like a parallel universe where conversations stay on track!
.Always on holiday these Greens voters, he has nearly as many holidays as you WizIt’s been suspiciously calm here… It feel like a parallel universe where conversations stay on track!
I almost miss the random detours into conspiracy theories… almost
Mate, Wiz is from the Mount…. Everyday’s a holiday down there
I don’t think he’s posted since Wiz & Inruin double teamed the poor lad 3 pages back haha
Think he's taking his 10 weeks accrued leave before Brookes new bill comes in
The Greens only allocate him a certain amount of time per website to post their propaganda. He is well over his limit for this one
Let's crack open the champagne team.Globally kids now more likely to be obese than starving. Dam capitalism and its abundance
Finding of more obese yet malnourished kids reignites junk food debate
UNICEF says more children are now overweight and under-nourished than too thin, stirring fresh calls by health experts and farming bodies to tax ultra-processed food producers.
You are right, we'd be doing much better if retarded parents stop feeding their kids dogshit. But that's a personal accountability thing and we know how allergic to that your ilk is.
You’re right, it is largely a parenting issue, but also largely too is a cost issue. I would probably lean towards a subsidy on the recommendation of the foods put forward by those with the knowledge than a tax on sugary foods, but both should probably be in the table. I lean towards the subsidy because you’re giving the option and it really falls back on the parent again to make the right choices. Unfortunately too it also can come down to a moaning child that wants the nice tasting things like myself and you lose all your first teeth at a young age which is another big issue
It’s an IQ and laziness problem not a cost problem.
I could agree with a lack of knowledge around what are the correct foods due to contested views, but nothing to do with iq or knowingly harming them due to laziness. Plenty of supposedly smart people eat shit food
That would then be the lazy part then wouldn’t it?
Not necessarily. Takes a bit of homework to source where all the food is from that’s consumed. For instance some are concerned about growth hormones that go into some chickens that the average consumer isn’t privy to such information
