If you look closely there's actual vast inequality and societal disparity that you can get upset about tooHeather Du Plessis Allen doesn't call female MPs cunts
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The thread centers on New Zealand's upcoming election, primarily debating the economic management and policy differences between the center-left Labour government and center-right National/ACT opposition. Key criticisms target Labour's fiscal stewardship, citing ballooning government expenditure #7#272, housing unaffordability, and unfulfilled promises like KiwiBuild and dental care expansion #16#12. A user #7 highlighted Labour's annual 9% spending growth versus 1.5% under previous governments, arguing this fueled inflation. National's tax-cut policy faced scrutiny over funding gaps and legality, with user #215 questioning Luxon's reliance on "trust me" assurances.
Leadership competence emerged as a critical theme, particularly in later posts. Luxon drew heavy criticism after a contentious interview where he struggled to defend policy details #194#199#211, while Willis faced backlash for her economic credentials. Hipkins garnered fleeting praise for articulation but was ultimately seen as representing poor governmental outcomes #45#119. A trusted user #308 presented expert economic analysis contradicting Treasury optimism. Infrastructure issues—like Wellington's water crisis and the dental school staffing shortage—were cited as examples of systemic mismanagement #235#12. Notable policy debates included road-user charges for EVs #220, immigration impacts on rents #299, and coalition scenarios involving NZ First #182#258. Early fringe discussions on candidates' rugby allegiances gave way to substantive policy critiques, culminating in grim Treasury forecasts discussed in posts #271#304#308. User #168 also revealed concerns about Labour rushing regulatory changes to entrench policies pre-election.
Economic Policies, Housing Crisis, Leadership Competence
If you look closely there's actual vast inequality and societal disparity that you can get upset about tooHeather Du Plessis Allen doesn't call female MPs cunts
To be honest, I’m not upset about the opinion piece at all. Was just trying to illustrate why it’s an issue, despite most of the opinion piece being benign. In fact, if Vance had refrained from being trashy, she would have had a positive impactIf you look closely there's actual vast inequality and societal disparity that you can get upset about too
I agree the choice of language created an opportunity for deflection.To be honest, I’m not upset about the opinion piece at all. Was just trying to illustrate why it’s an issue, despite most of the opinion piece being benign. In fact, if Vance had refrained from being trashy, she would have had a positive impact
And yes, agreed with your point re societal issues
A great new zealander
Based on what you think of people who don't follow the same lines as you, I'm wondering how you get on with the wife and kids at home when there is a differing opinion. Are they culture war numpties as well?You guys should try reading a bit more broadly on the topic rather than the circle jerk of middle aged dudes agreeing with one another that this thread becomes.
Wise words Rick, what if Top8 had a son who turned out to be a greedy neoliberal capitalist? Actually wasn't that the premise of Family Ties with Michael J Fox? The 80's eh. I had a thing for Justine Bateman.
Based on what you think of people who don't follow the same lines as you, I'm wondering how you get on with the wife and kids at home when there is a differing opinion. Are they culture war numpties as well?
We can all agree to disagree without the theatrics.
Perhaps@juju how dare you, we're not a bunch of old dudes circle jerking each other.
oh it’s fine,I agree the choice of language created an opportunity for deflection.
"Turns out you can have it all. So long as you’re prepared to be a c... to the women who birth your kids, school your offspring and wipe the arse of your elderly parents while you stand on their shoulders to earn your six-figure, taxpayer-funded pay packet"
If you re read Dirty Politics there is alot worse than that contained in that book.
Make it make sense Marvoh it’s fine,
you can just railroad and bully them, or at the very least call them a bigot for not agreeing with you.
haha weird!!Make it make sense Marv
I was getting ready to bully and railroad. damnhaha weird!!
that wasn’t even the post i relied to?!
also wasn’t pointed at you, man.
just at this thread.
It cuts both ways Rick. I cop a lot of shit that maybe I ask for, maybe I don't, but often there's no middle ground fired at me.
Based on what you think of people who don't follow the same lines as you, I'm wondering how you get on with the wife and kids at home when there is a differing opinion. Are they culture war numpties as well?
We can all agree to disagree without the theatrics.
oh!!!
Based on what you think of people who don't follow the same lines as you, I'm wondering how you get on with the wife and kids at home when there is a differing opinion. Are they culture war numpties as well?
We can all agree to disagree without the theatrics.
Keep speaking your truth to power, time will tell if you're the sane one and everyone else is nuts.It cuts both ways Rick. I cop a lot of shit that maybe I ask for, maybe I don't, but often there's no middle ground fired at me.
Can't stand conspiracy, can't stand the repetition of lies and mistruths, definitely can't stand bullying.
We all have filters. I happen to believe we have a far right government increasing wealth transfer upwards and exponentially powering inequality. That's the right, that's neoliberalism.
I believe strongly this is morally, ethically and from a human perspective utterly destructive and wrong.
I believe we're in an age of fascists and an oligarchy looking to destroy western democracy.
So a counterpoint to the right and sometimes hard right circular conversations on here, and from at least one poster quite nasty stuff isn't unreasonable.
What if the whole basis of your world view was wrong?I happen to believe we have a far right government increasing wealth transfer upwards and exponentially powering inequality. That's the right, that's neoliberalism.
There's no calendar when you're retired mate, time is measured by the hour glass, sometimes half full, often half emptywhat time do “lunch beers” normally finish for you?
end of lunch or end of calendar day?
All nasty stuff is unreasonable. I don't agree with a lot of your posts but I do defend your right to post them. When it gets down to the name calling and personal rhetoric then I have a problem. If we were all the same as each other it wouldn't be Nirvana for long (this is based on 3 scores and 10 experience) Human nature is such.So a counterpoint to the right and sometimes hard right circular conversations on here, and from at least one poster quite nasty stuff isn't unreasonable.
Always empty 'cos that's what happens with a long lunchThere's no calendar when you're retired mate, time is measured by the hour glass, sometimes half full, often half empty
It's always lunchtime somewhere koroAlways empty 'cos that's what happens with a long lunch