Politics 🗳️ NZ Politics

🤖 AI Summary

📝 Summary:

The thread centers on New Zealand's upcoming election, primarily debating the economic management and policy differences between the center-left Labour government and center-right National/ACT opposition. Key criticisms target Labour's fiscal stewardship, citing ballooning government expenditure #7#272, housing unaffordability, and unfulfilled promises like KiwiBuild and dental care expansion #16#12. A user #7 highlighted Labour's annual 9% spending growth versus 1.5% under previous governments, arguing this fueled inflation. National's tax-cut policy faced scrutiny over funding gaps and legality, with user #215 questioning Luxon's reliance on "trust me" assurances.
Leadership competence emerged as a critical theme, particularly in later posts. Luxon drew heavy criticism after a contentious interview where he struggled to defend policy details #194#199#211, while Willis faced backlash for her economic credentials. Hipkins garnered fleeting praise for articulation but was ultimately seen as representing poor governmental outcomes #45#119. A trusted user #308 presented expert economic analysis contradicting Treasury optimism. Infrastructure issues—like Wellington's water crisis and the dental school staffing shortage—were cited as examples of systemic mismanagement #235#12. Notable policy debates included road-user charges for EVs #220, immigration impacts on rents #299, and coalition scenarios involving NZ First #182#258. Early fringe discussions on candidates' rugby allegiances gave way to substantive policy critiques, culminating in grim Treasury forecasts discussed in posts #271#304#308. User #168 also revealed concerns about Labour rushing regulatory changes to entrench policies pre-election.

🏷️ Tags:

Economic Policies, Housing Crisis, Leadership Competence

📊 Data Source: Based on ALL posts in thread (total: 10000 posts) | ⏱️ Total Generation Time: 20s
You don't have permission to regenerate AI summary.

NZWarriors.com

If you look closely there's actual vast inequality and societal disparity that you can get upset about too
To be honest, I’m not upset about the opinion piece at all. Was just trying to illustrate why it’s an issue, despite most of the opinion piece being benign. In fact, if Vance had refrained from being trashy, she would have had a positive impact

And yes, agreed with your point re societal issues
 
To be honest, I’m not upset about the opinion piece at all. Was just trying to illustrate why it’s an issue, despite most of the opinion piece being benign. In fact, if Vance had refrained from being trashy, she would have had a positive impact

And yes, agreed with your point re societal issues
I agree the choice of language created an opportunity for deflection.

"Turns out you can have it all. So long as you’re prepared to be a c... to the women who birth your kids, school your offspring and wipe the arse of your elderly parents while you stand on their shoulders to earn your six-figure, taxpayer-funded pay packet"

If you re read Dirty Politics there is alot worse than that contained in that book.
 
You guys should try reading a bit more broadly on the topic rather than the circle jerk of middle aged dudes agreeing with one another that this thread becomes.
Based on what you think of people who don't follow the same lines as you, I'm wondering how you get on with the wife and kids at home when there is a differing opinion. Are they culture war numpties as well?

We can all agree to disagree without the theatrics.
 

Based on what you think of people who don't follow the same lines as you, I'm wondering how you get on with the wife and kids at home when there is a differing opinion. Are they culture war numpties as well?

We can all agree to disagree without the theatrics.
Wise words Rick, what if Top8 had a son who turned out to be a greedy neoliberal capitalist? Actually wasn't that the premise of Family Ties with Michael J Fox? The 80's eh. I had a thing for Justine Bateman.

@juju how dare you, we're not a bunch of old dudes circle jerking each other.

...are we?
 
I agree the choice of language created an opportunity for deflection.

"Turns out you can have it all. So long as you’re prepared to be a c... to the women who birth your kids, school your offspring and wipe the arse of your elderly parents while you stand on their shoulders to earn your six-figure, taxpayer-funded pay packet"

If you re read Dirty Politics there is alot worse than that contained in that book.
oh it’s fine,
you can just railroad and bully them, or at the very least call them a bigot for not agreeing with you.
 

Based on what you think of people who don't follow the same lines as you, I'm wondering how you get on with the wife and kids at home when there is a differing opinion. Are they culture war numpties as well?

We can all agree to disagree without the theatrics.
It cuts both ways Rick. I cop a lot of shit that maybe I ask for, maybe I don't, but often there's no middle ground fired at me.

Can't stand conspiracy, can't stand the repetition of lies and mistruths, definitely can't stand bullying.

We all have filters. I happen to believe we have a far right government increasing wealth transfer upwards and exponentially powering inequality. That's the right, that's neoliberalism.

I believe strongly this is morally, ethically and from a human perspective utterly destructive and wrong.

I believe we're in an age of fascists and an oligarchy looking to destroy western democracy.

So a counterpoint to the right and sometimes hard right circular conversations on here, and from at least one poster quite nasty stuff isn't unreasonable.
 

Based on what you think of people who don't follow the same lines as you, I'm wondering how you get on with the wife and kids at home when there is a differing opinion. Are they culture war numpties as well?

We can all agree to disagree without the theatrics.
oh!!!
this was the one i meant to reply to! but some how i just replied to @juju hahaha.
sorry everyone,
carry on.

what time do “lunch beers” normally finish for you?
end of lunch or end of calendar day?
🫠
 
It cuts both ways Rick. I cop a lot of shit that maybe I ask for, maybe I don't, but often there's no middle ground fired at me.

Can't stand conspiracy, can't stand the repetition of lies and mistruths, definitely can't stand bullying.

We all have filters. I happen to believe we have a far right government increasing wealth transfer upwards and exponentially powering inequality. That's the right, that's neoliberalism.

I believe strongly this is morally, ethically and from a human perspective utterly destructive and wrong.

I believe we're in an age of fascists and an oligarchy looking to destroy western democracy.

So a counterpoint to the right and sometimes hard right circular conversations on here, and from at least one poster quite nasty stuff isn't unreasonable.
Keep speaking your truth to power, time will tell if you're the sane one and everyone else is nuts.
 
I happen to believe we have a far right government increasing wealth transfer upwards and exponentially powering inequality. That's the right, that's neoliberalism.
What if the whole basis of your world view was wrong?

What if house prices haven’t risen under this govt?
What if the sharemarket hasn’t risen under this govt? (The above means businesses aren’t making any money).
What if there are record business closures under this govt.

It’s a myth the rich are getting rich under this govt. How’s can the rich get rich when property, shares and businesses are all being smashed?

You think this govt is for the rich, despite every economic indicator pointing to the opposite?

Consider if your internal biases allow you to see the real picture, because you are at odds with all the data…

Inequality - I’m picking the top 1% have lost more wealth than the other 99% combined!
 
So a counterpoint to the right and sometimes hard right circular conversations on here, and from at least one poster quite nasty stuff isn't unreasonable.
All nasty stuff is unreasonable. I don't agree with a lot of your posts but I do defend your right to post them. When it gets down to the name calling and personal rhetoric then I have a problem. If we were all the same as each other it wouldn't be Nirvana for long (this is based on 3 scores and 10 experience) Human nature is such.
 
Back
Top Bottom