Never met a SAHD who said it was harder than the 9-5..You won't see us sitting on the couch watching The View and not participating in the workforce when men get wombs and give birth mate, if you want something done properly do it yourself.

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Never met a SAHD who said it was harder than the 9-5..You won't see us sitting on the couch watching The View and not participating in the workforce when men get wombs and give birth mate, if you want something done properly do it yourself.
Now you mention it, neither have I, wish I'd been one moreNever met a SAHD who said it was harder than the 9-5..![]()
Sometimes weekend we’re harder than being at workNever met a SAHD who said it was harder than the 9-5..![]()
Very true, obesity and COPD seem to take up a great amount of the system.Gotta have those taxpayer funded bariatric surgeries.
You won't see us sitting on the couch watching The View and not participating in the workforce when men get wombs and give birth mate, if you want something done properly do it yourself.
Doesn’t cut it.You really should move to America and help them resurrect their manufacturing base.
The latter. But luckily for us mere mortals, the grievance peddlers themselves have created a handy little "comparator" matrix that justifies this "redistribution" of wages.With this pay equity piece, are female Librarians, for example, saying they aren't being paid the same as male librarians or are they saying that as its a female orientated job (I'm assuming it is) that they have been unfairly held down wage wise and should be getting similar to a male dominated role like a fisheries officer, despite the two being distinctly different jobs? Or both?
In the case of librarians, I don't think it matters whether they are male or female. The disparity isn't there. They are asserting their role is similar or as important as a fisheries officer and should be recompensed as such. Almost as looney as the Greens new budget.With this pay equity piece, are female Librarians, for example, saying they aren't being paid the same as male librarians or are they saying that as its a female orientated job (I'm assuming it is) that they have been unfairly held down wage wise and should be getting similar to a male dominated role like a fisheries officer, despite the two being distinctly different jobs? Or both?
The latter. But luckily for us mere mortals, the grievance peddlers themselves have created a handy little "comparator" matrix that justifies this "redistribution" of wages.
I'm just confused as to why they don't open their own private libraries and pay librarians this comparative wage?
(not going off on librarians obv, but the bureaucrats)
So these claims were going to be backdated if accepted?In the case of librarians, I don't think it matters whether they are male or female. The disparity isn't there. They are asserting their role is similar or as important as a fisheries officer and should be recompensed as such. Almost as looney as the Greens new budget.
Also, the claims being brought to the tribunal were all public sector and union backed. This is why the cost could be billions to the taxpayer.
Nothing to see here for private employers other than having to compete