Politics 🗳️ NZ Politics

So what are the parameters of a "meritocracy"? Who is deciding that? Hint: The Right. It seems the right are deciding those, precisely the point of the original post. And those parameters are deliberately divisive.

View attachment 12030

So they, like yourself, are making shit up to reinforce a deliberate strategy of a weaponised fake culture war.
Immm… individuals (left or right) making individual judgements on who is best for the job rather than having a requirement for diversity targets.

Diversity targets are the divisiveness that gave NZ First and Act a platform last election. People don’t like being second class citizens.

Go ask the navy or the reserve bank what happens when you don’t go for the best 😉
 

NZWarriors.com


Will be interesting to see if the government listens to the public. Not a good chapter for Seymour
Not great for him.

It does raise an interesting point that voters and the media seem to be more concerned with the government’s role in providing free lunches and having a ferry across the cook strait than they are about the big issues like the brain drain, education, health, quality of life etc
 
The school lunches is a cluster fuck. I don't know anyone who thought what labour brought in was a bad idea. $8 a day for something decent is fuck all in the scheme of things and it has so much down stream benefit.
Anyone who thinks you are going to get anything decent delivered for $3 a day hasn't been to the supermarket in a long time.
Especially from a mob electioneering on a premise of getting kids back into school
 
Utterly corrupt. Utterly regressive.

I'm wondering if there's more to this than meets the eye and the mining in the area is just a "convenient excuse" as why not look at moving the proposed location of the windfarm to the North Taranaki Bight. Access from the port at New Plymouth would still be the same. There are also at least five other proposals for offshore wind farms within the South Taranaki Bight. Perhaps Bluefloat just couldn't get the numbers to stack up while others could.

Bluefloat had also previously complained that neither the previous or current governments were prepared to offer them subsidies/tax breaks for their proposal.
 
Last edited:
Some "flippers" are starting to come out of the woodwork again.. buying properties with a long settlement date and then trying to flip them off before they have to settle. If it doesn't sell on again, they then walk away from the original deal which has written in them that they were able to market and sell a property before it settled or settled when they had on sold it.

I choose long ago not to do any work for some of these guys.... they'd buy a place then do un-permitted alterations then get drawings done by a designer so they could apply for either a Safe and Sanitary (S&S) claiming the work was done before 1992 or a Cert. of Acceptance (CoA) for work done after 1992 but claiming it was done by the previous owner. Why? It's cheaper and quicker to get either a S&S or CoA than apply for a Building Consent, have the work inspected and get a CCC.

 
Some "flippers" are starting to come out of the woodwork again.. buying properties with a long settlement date and then trying to flip them off before they have to settle. If it doesn't sell on again, they then walk away from the original deal which has written in them that they were able to market and sell a property before it settled or settled when they had on sold it.

I choose long ago not to do any work for some of these guys.... they'd buy a place then do un-permitted alterations then get drawings done by a designer so they could apply for either a Safe and Sanitary (S&S) claiming the work was done before 1992 or a Cert. of Acceptance (CoA) for work done after 1992 but claiming it was done by the previous owner. Why? It's cheaper and quicker to get either a S&S or CoA than apply for a Building Consent, have the work inspected and get a CCC.

Blame the system, not the people fed up with said diabolical system!
 

Former IRD tax agent gets home detention for decade-long fraud​

A former Inland Revenue tax agent has received the maximum length of home detention possible for sustained tax fraud after more than a decade of cheating the system.

Chafic Georges, 71, a former Inland Revenue tax agent, was sentenced to 12 months home detention in the Manukau District Court after appearing on 19 tax fraud charges.

Following a risk review of Georges' tax affairs, an Inland Revenue investigation found he and his family accumulated wealth not accounted for in his income tax returns.

While operating as a registered tax agent and sole trader from October 2006 to January 2018, Georges committed sustained tax fraud. This was after his time working for Inland Revenue.

This included filing false personal tax returns and false income tax and GST returns for third parties. Those refunds were paid to bank accounts controlled by Georges for his personal use.

According to the findings, the total amount Georges received in relation to his personal income tax liability and Working for Families Tax Credits (WfFTC) payments was roughly $208,000.

The total GST, income tax and WfFTC for third parties was just over $11,000.

The court heard there were very serious aggravating features in this case such as Georges’ previous employment with Inland Revenue, his breach of trust as a tax agent, the extreme length of time of the offending, and continuing to offend even in the face of investigation.

The judge started with a sentence of 40 months imprisonment for Georges, however, this was reduced by 25% for a guilty plea and another 15% for his health, age and offer of reparation.

This brought Georges' possible sentence down to 24 months in prison and meant home detention could be considered.

The judge believed Georges was unlikely to re-offend and that a final sentence of 12 months home detention was appropriate given his age and health issues.

Alongside the sentence of home detention, Georges was ordered to pay full reparation.

 
I'm wondering if there's more to this than meets the eye and the mining in the area is just a "convenient excuse" as why not look at moving the proposed location of the windfarm to the North Taranaki Bight. Access from the port at New Plymouth would still be the same. There are also at least five other proposals for offshore wind farms within the South Taranaki Bight. Perhaps Bluefloat just couldn't get the numbers to stack up while others could.

Bluefloat had also previously complained that neither the previous or current governments were prepared to offer them subsidies/tax breaks for their proposal.
Offshore wind is collapsing globally. It will never happen in Aus / NZ due to costs. The heavy lift barge cranes are like $250k a day and booked for years in the northern hemisphere.
 
When the IMF thinks you should have a CGT


 
    Nobody is reading this thread right now.
Back
Top Bottom