Politics 🗳️ NZ Politics

🤖 AI Summary

📝 Summary:

The thread centers on New Zealand's upcoming election, primarily debating the economic management and policy differences between the center-left Labour government and center-right National/ACT opposition. Key criticisms target Labour's fiscal stewardship, citing ballooning government expenditure #7#272, housing unaffordability, and unfulfilled promises like KiwiBuild and dental care expansion #16#12. A user #7 highlighted Labour's annual 9% spending growth versus 1.5% under previous governments, arguing this fueled inflation. National's tax-cut policy faced scrutiny over funding gaps and legality, with user #215 questioning Luxon's reliance on "trust me" assurances.
Leadership competence emerged as a critical theme, particularly in later posts. Luxon drew heavy criticism after a contentious interview where he struggled to defend policy details #194#199#211, while Willis faced backlash for her economic credentials. Hipkins garnered fleeting praise for articulation but was ultimately seen as representing poor governmental outcomes #45#119. A trusted user #308 presented expert economic analysis contradicting Treasury optimism. Infrastructure issues—like Wellington's water crisis and the dental school staffing shortage—were cited as examples of systemic mismanagement #235#12. Notable policy debates included road-user charges for EVs #220, immigration impacts on rents #299, and coalition scenarios involving NZ First #182#258. Early fringe discussions on candidates' rugby allegiances gave way to substantive policy critiques, culminating in grim Treasury forecasts discussed in posts #271#304#308. User #168 also revealed concerns about Labour rushing regulatory changes to entrench policies pre-election.

🏷️ Tags:

Economic Policies, Housing Crisis, Leadership Competence

📊 Data Source: Based on ALL posts in thread (total: 10000 posts) | ⏱️ Total Generation Time: 20s
You don't have permission to regenerate AI summary.

NZWarriors.com


Have to hand it to this guy, at least he doesn’t hide what a fuckwit he is. Interesting seeing on the news even Willis on the topic saying we’ll leave David to explain his sense of humour when saying labour’s smoke free proposal was quite evil but then walking it back
 
No surprises that this government want to remove obstacles to wealth extraction. Of the rich, by the rich, for the rich.

View attachment 13571
You support the irrelevancy that is regional councils?

We went from them costing $30 in our rates several years ago to over $500 now. Rates are a huge contributor to the cost of living crisis and working poor - just making us all poor. Can’t tell what they even do. A great example of empire building and organisations making a job for themselves in a monopolistic position.

Auckland ditched regional councils and nobody ever complains.

Why can’t normal council do their job?

(And I clarify that by saying councils should be much bigger, covering whole regions.)
 
No surprises that this government want to remove obstacles to wealth extraction. Of the rich, by the rich, for the rich.

View attachment 13571
You talk of govt creating crisis to justify changes - this is council incompetence forcing the govt to intervene.

Mate, the councils have been so excessive in their rate increases there is a real hate towards them (cost rather than services) where excessive rate increases is unable to be voted out. The pitiful turnout at election is evidence people have lost faith in the councils.

Councils are an uncontrollable money pit that have no sense of keeping costs reasonable. 20% proposed rates increase when inflation is 10% of that is outrageous. People on fixed incomes rightfully feeling victimised.

When the govt reins them in, they only have themselves to blame. They have caused a financial crisis for many ratepayers and don’t care. Prime candidate for sorting out.

It will be the councils fault and I will back the govt. No manufactured crisis here just a prime example council entitlement and excess.
 
Last edited:
You talk of govt creating crisis to justify changes - this is council incompetence forcing the govt to intervene.

Mate, the councils have been so excessive in their rate increases there is a real hate towards them (cost rather than services) where excessive rate increases is unable to be voted out. The pitiful turnout at election is evidence people have lost faith in the councils.

Councils are an uncontrollable money pit that have no sense of keeping costs reasonable. 20% proposed rates increase when inflation is 10% of that is outrageous. People on fixed incomes rightfully feeling victimised.

When the govt reins them in, they only have themselves to blame. They have caused a financial crisis for many ratepayers and don’t care. Prime candidate for sorting out.

It will be the councils fault and I will back the govt. No manufactured crisis here just a prime example council entitlement and excess.
Massive pushback on local councils here in Aus. Talk of abolishment etc. Esp since we have 3 layers. Fed, state AND local. 3 sets of hands in the cookie jar
 
We have a bit of a problem as well. I think LTNZ gave the design contract to a 12 year old who had a $100 Lego set.
I saw a motorist hit one the other day and become cast on top of it. Rubbish collection day, the bins were stacked in the cycle lane as the truck had to broach the barriers to pick up and left no room for traffic trailing behind. Quite the joke and I believe the bill is $3m so far. I expect them to be ripped up by xmas.

Not sure about the rest of the country but you can count the numbers on one hand of kids who ride bikes to school around here or walk for that matter

 
Back
Top Bottom