Taking your comment on face value, the only problem with what you are proposing is that we won’t get the infrastructure we need as it will constantly be kicked around and nothing will get done. When the government continually gets judged on its handling of public money, large projects are difficult to get off the ground
At least with a PPP, things move forward as it is an easier sell politically. If there is greater cost, the benefit *should* be a faster project approval and therefore, infrastructure
What’s better - needed infrastructure we can use, but with an added margin. Or less infrastructure that takes longer but less margin?