i agree it would have been continued but it wasn’t.The policy would have been further funded had labour retained power.
Sure, there are probably lots of kids that don't need it. But there are 1000s and 1000s of kids that do. Principles and teachers have said the policy has been helping.
The rest of your rant is weird. On the one had free lunches are good, but also kids are buying junk food and we should be responsible for ourselves. Lol.
all those whinging and implying that seymour was cancelling something that was in place forever when they knew it wasn’t was bullshit.
i do think all kids should be entitled to free lunches.
i don’t think kids who have enough money to shovel that kind of rubbish into themselves before and after school NEED free lunches. the same way i don’t think people who spend their pay on pokies NEED the government to pay their rent.
i do think we need to learn/be taught to look after ourselves and not be reliant on governments who never have and never will give us everything we need.
i would absolutely LOVE to see all children fed, healthy, clothed, learning and thriving. but relying on the state to make that happen is an impossibility.
and we’re seemingly unable to do it ourselves. shit, we struggle not to neglect, make obese or beat our children to death, how are going to help them to thrive?
our biggest issue is ourselves.