My team played against him earlier in the season (I wasn't playing), it's fair to say he went OK.Stuff
www.newshub.co.nz
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
My team played against him earlier in the season (I wasn't playing), it's fair to say he went OK.Stuff
www.newshub.co.nz
Be interesting to see how that opening pair goes. Both have looked out of form, particularly Conway.So the test side is named, I still won't be selecting Ravindra.
1 T Latham
2 D Conway
3 K Williamson
4 D Mitchell
5 G Phillips
6 T Blundell wk
7 M Santner
8 K Jamieson
9 M Henry
10 N Wagner
11 T Southee c
12 R Ravindra
Not sure 20/20 is a good build up or indication of form for a test
I think any form of competitive cricket is a better build up than facing a bowling machine or throw downs in the nets.Not sure 20/20 is a good build up or indication of form for a test
not sure if a frustrating 12 off 14 is betterI think any form of competitive cricket is a better build up than facing a bowling machine or throw downs in the nets.
Injured I believeAnyone know why Tim Robinson was not playing for Wellington?
I really really really like this side. Lots of bowling options for the 5th bowler duty, you can go with Mitchell's medium pace, or Glenn's floaty off spin or Ravindra's faster left arm orthodox. Am doing him a favour by not calling them darts but it doesn't flight it much to be fair. Still he knows his role and if he can get one to turn at his pace it will be a wicket taking delivery.Think the modern player is used to having to switch between formats, playing Test cricket after a diet of T20s is pretty much the norm these days, May not be the best preparation but its the way it is.
1. Conway
2. Latham
3. Williamson
4. Ravindra
5. Mitchell
6. Phillips
7. Blundell
8. Jamieson
9. Southee
10. Henry
11. ORourke