Politics šŸ—³ļø NZ Politics

šŸ¤– AI Summary

šŸ“ Summary:

The thread centers on New Zealand's upcoming election, primarily debating the economic management and policy differences between the center-left Labour government and center-right National/ACT opposition. Key criticisms target Labour's fiscal stewardship, citing ballooning government expenditure #7#272, housing unaffordability, and unfulfilled promises like KiwiBuild and dental care expansion #16#12. A user #7 highlighted Labour's annual 9% spending growth versus 1.5% under previous governments, arguing this fueled inflation. National's tax-cut policy faced scrutiny over funding gaps and legality, with user #215 questioning Luxon's reliance on "trust me" assurances.
Leadership competence emerged as a critical theme, particularly in later posts. Luxon drew heavy criticism after a contentious interview where he struggled to defend policy details #194#199#211, while Willis faced backlash for her economic credentials. Hipkins garnered fleeting praise for articulation but was ultimately seen as representing poor governmental outcomes #45#119. A trusted user #308 presented expert economic analysis contradicting Treasury optimism. Infrastructure issues—like Wellington's water crisis and the dental school staffing shortage—were cited as examples of systemic mismanagement #235#12. Notable policy debates included road-user charges for EVs #220, immigration impacts on rents #299, and coalition scenarios involving NZ First #182#258. Early fringe discussions on candidates' rugby allegiances gave way to substantive policy critiques, culminating in grim Treasury forecasts discussed in posts #271#304#308. User #168 also revealed concerns about Labour rushing regulatory changes to entrench policies pre-election.

šŸ·ļø Tags:

Economic Policies, Housing Crisis, Leadership Competence

šŸ“Š Data Source: Based on ALL posts in thread (total: 10000 posts) | ā±ļø Total Generation Time: 20s
You don't have permission to regenerate AI summary.
ACT - only libertarian if your views are their views, authoritarian if not - View attachment 4903
The bigger question, while Rome is burning, why even focus in this. Parliament time is valuable. Fix the real issues instead of all these side shows.

Glad this new govt isn’t spending time on this and is focused on health, education, crime and the economy. And the polls show the public is appreciating it.

Crimes and education were problem under Labour - the fact the left supports pandering to kids and criminals votes shows how they really lost focus in these areas. Perhaps if they replaced Hipkins they might reprioritise before they fall out the bottom of the polls…
 

NZWarriors.com

The bigger question, while Rome is burning, why even focus in this. Parliament time is valuable. Fix the real issues instead of all these side shows.

Glad this new govt isn’t spending time on this and is focused on health, education, crime and the economy. And the polls show the public is appreciating it.

Crimes and education were problem under Labour - the fact the left supports pandering to kids and criminals votes shows how they really lost focus in these areas. Perhaps if they replaced Hipkins they might reprioritise before they fall out the bottom of the polls…
The quotes are from the sideshow that is this government. Don't you care about democracy Wiz?
 
What crimes though Wiz?
Should someone who stole a loaf of bread be unable to vote?
Someone who got caught with a 50 of weed?
Parking fines?
Don’t even know what the current rules are?

Serious question - do people in jail even want to vote? Half the people engage in society don’t even bother so why would the disillusioned?

Bit of a storm in a teacup isn’t it?
 
I don't agree with his analysis. I drive a diesel passenger car, and pay RUCs.

My vehicle classification pays RUCs at the lightest rate ( vehicles < 3500kgs), and, at 1,800kgs, weighs less than a Tesla.

I have no problem with the fact that the lightest vehicle rate is the same as a ute.

He's just writing politically charged nonsense when there is no issue to speak of.

I wouldn't mind paying RUCs at a lighter vehicle rate if there was one, but there isn't
RUCs were always coming for EVs it’s been in the news about other countries for ages. but for some reason people thought if their car didn’t run on combustible fuel then the roads and highways would build and maintain themselves.
 
What crimes though Wiz?
Should someone who stole a loaf of bread be unable to vote?
Someone who got caught with a 50 of weed?
Parking fines?
I think in Oz it's still a 3 year line. That is if you are convicted and sentenced to more than 3 years imprisonment, you lose the right to vote. Pretty sure there are quite a few countries that have the same or more stringent rules. The UK being one.
 
Democracy isnt broken. In fact we are considered one of the most democratic countries in the world. A few Scandinavian countries are ranked higher according to this.


What is the voting age in those countries?
That was in 2020.

One of the principles is to ā€˜accept the will of the voters’

We might have dropped after the last elections temper tantrum 🤣
 
RUCs were always coming for EVs it’s been in the news about other countries for ages. but for some reason people thought if their car didn’t run on combustible fuel then the roads and highways would build and maintain themselves.
Interesting that the government has committed to extending the number of public EV charges currently from 1300 to 10000 by 2030….. and EV owners don’t think they should contribute to that through RUC’s. Speaking off entitled.
 
Interesting that the government has committed to extending the number of public EV charges currently from 1300 to 10000 by 2030….. and EV owners don’t think they should contribute to that through RUC’s. Speaking off entitled.
Interested to hear your thoughts on this miket12.
Petrol stations are not financed by taxpayers.
Why then should taxpayers front for charging stations.
Why not electricity suppliers and ev manufacturers?
Have I missed something here šŸ˜•
Asking you particularly because I respect your opinion
 
Back
Top Bottom