Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The discussion revolves around Andrew Webster's performance as coach of the New Zealand Warriors, particularly following a disappointing season compared to the perceived overachievement of the previous year. While some question his strategies and selection decisions, the prevailing sentiment is that he deserves continued support, given the team's injury woes and the need for long-term stability. Many feel he is not the primary issue at hand but suggest better players would help improve overall performance. Recently, there's been increased debate about Webster's role and whether he's the right person to lead the team forward, prompting posters to defend the coach and to call for patience, and improved resources.
A key point of contention is Webster's game plan and its perceived rigidity, with some arguing that it lacks adaptability and that the team's attack has become predictable. This is compounded by the overuse of certain players, and underutilization of others, leading to internal discord. ##robbiemears #90943 emphasized the disharmony, observing negative body language among players. However, sup42 #71899 expressed faith in the coach's vision, and cautioned against knee-jerk reactions based on short-term results, noting that sustained success requires long-term commitment which includes stability in coaching.
Several participants highlighted the importance of Webster’s support staff, suggesting that he may need stronger assistant coaches to guide the team effectively. Others observed patterns that Webster appears to be risk averse, and that team selections do not address players current skillset. Christchurch_Warrior #97315 expressed frustration with Webster's reluctance to publicly criticize refereeing decisions, linking it with the need to protect the players whereas other contributors called for accountability and expressed dissatisfaction at the current direction.
Despite the varying opinions, a central theme is the desire for stability and long-term planning. BangBro's still banging^244 and others, argued against the "revolving coaching door policy" that has plagued the Warriors in the past. They contend that Webster needs time to grow as a coach and that the team requires an overhaul, which he will help transition in. A few suggested he could use a mentor to help in the process. Dantheman #108054 and others highlight, that the coach is good, but squad age, the inconsistency of performance when covering missing players and ongoing injuries are a major detractor to their success in game.
Keywords: Andrew Webster, Warriors, NRL, coach, coaching, team performance, stability, recruitment, game plan, selection, injuries, accountability, long-term planning, fan reaction.
Replace him with Ciraldo.Fire him!
Can't believe he wasn't picked up by another club. Going to be interesting how next year goes as other teams start to work out what we do. I suspect he will rise to the occasion as he seems to be a special coach.
When I saw this at the interview I swear it was a subtle dig at the refs.
It had to be, too much of a coincidenceWhen I saw this at the interview I swear it was a subtle dig at the refs.
I know a few older people who use this as their pointing finger.It had to be, too much of a coincidence
Some of our past coaches it was obviously not working. But I've always been in favour of if you have the right guy you should have faith in them to correct a bad season.Bro I'm riding this train all the way! I just hope when the club transitions from the Tohu, SJ sheck days, that we remember these good times and the fact he is a good coach and good leader.
He's the right kind of person who can bring in the new wave, but he will need time and we will have to be patient again some day.
Long may this continue!
Further to the above.Some of our past coaches it was obviously not working. But I've always been in favour of if you have the right guy you should have faith in them to correct a bad season.
We have an experienced squad at the moment. If a few key players retire at the same time we will likely have a bit of a hit. I'd be in favour of the club letting him rebuild the squad.
He said he coaches to the players he has not to a pre-imagined game plan. I'd have faith that if we had a bad year after a few key guys retire he would adjust the style of play the following year.
Agree! It would be amazing to see what he does with a young team that has been playing juniors and cup together for a while.Some of our past coaches it was obviously not working. But I've always been in favour of if you have the right guy you should have faith in them to correct a bad season.
We have an experienced squad at the moment. If a few key players retire at the same time we will likely have a bit of a hit. I'd be in favour of the club letting him rebuild the squad.
He said he coaches to the players he has not to a pre-imagined game plan. I'd have faith that if we had a bad year after a few key guys retire he would adjust the style of play the following year.