Politics ðŸ¤¡ Donald Trump


I don't think being on the left or right should affect how one feels about someone getting murdered in such a sick way? Or what Trump thinks about it? I also think it's tragic that a young man was radicalised and his life is now wasted after murdering KIRK. Our world is getting sicker, more divided and the best way to help situations like this is to have no different feelings re tragic stuff that happens to people on the left or right. If we do, it shows that we are more than likely partially radicalised. There are forces at work that want the world divided, it is easier to control via reactionary forces. We have to resist and disagree with views and ideas but show respect toward each other, and care for the rights and well being of people on both sides. Otherwise we are just pawns, when the masses is where the power really resides. I think his death is tragic, but also that kid who was radicalised and will either be killed or spend the rest of his life in prison.
 
Last edited:

NZWarriors.com

I don't think being on the left or right should affect how one feels about someone getting murdered in such a sick way? Or what Trump thinks about it? I also think it's tragic that a young man was radicalised and his life is now wasted after murdering KIRK. Our world is getting sicker, more divided and the best way to help situations like this is to have no different feelings re tragic stuff that happens to people on the left or right. If we do, it shows that we are more than likely partially radicalised. There are forces at work that want the world divided, it is easier to control via reactionary forces. We have to resist and disagree with views and ideas but show respect toward each other, and care for the rights and well being of people on both sides. Otherwise we are just pawns, when the masses is where the power really resides. I think his death is tragic, but also that kid who was radicalised and will either be killed or spend the rest of his life in prison.
Hate to tell you but we're all pawns in some politician's game my blue eyed son.


View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=S7Gg2A4D2Ic
 
Last edited:
Hate to tell you but we're all pawns in some politician's game my blue eyed son.


View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=S7Gg2A4D2Ic

Here's my view:
There's an argument that we should all gather together to be The One, forget all our differences, to go for the Gold Diamond Sapphire Apple At The Top Of The Tree.
Which would be fine, if it was the only Apple On The Tree. But it's not. There's - a few branches down - A Purple Diamond Apple that benefits Group C of The One. And, here's the kicker, that Gold, Diamond, Sapphire Apple? Group C of The One don't think that's actually gettable and also, actually it's going to benefit Group A (white, male, heterosexual, ablebodied, wealthy etc cliche) of The One more, who Group C really don't like that much anyhow, so why shouldn't they grab that Purple Diamond Apple and screw everybody else, we fine!?

Not sure I like identity politics or not, everybody breaking up into smaller groups, being a member of a minority group myself, but I understand why it might be attractive.
 
Back
Top Bottom