He’s moved them closer to the Epstein filesWhat is this, posturing or a credible threat?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The forum thread extensively discusses Donald Trump's legal battles and his 2024 presidential campaign, centering on fraud convictions, election eligibility disputes, and broader political implications. A central focus is the New York fraud case where Trump was fined over $350 million and barred from business roles, as outlined in #358, alongside ongoing debates about his appeal strategies. Eligibility challenges under the 14th Amendment are debated, particularly rulings in Colorado and Maine blocking him from primary ballots due to alleged insurrection ties, emphasized in #260#301. Participants analyze the fairness of these legal actions, with user #393 arguing that Trump faces numerous accusations but lacks criminal convictions, while others cite his civil liabilities. Nikki Haley's primary win in Washington D.C. is noted in #387, highlighting intra-party dynamics. The thread also explores broader concerns, including geopolitical risks under a potential Trump presidency and critiques of Republican policies, referencing abortion access impacts in #385. Throughout, there is polarization over Trump's guilt, political viability, and the implications for democracy.
Trump's Legal Challenges, 2024 Election Campaign, Insurrection Allegations
He’s moved them closer to the Epstein filesWhat is this, posturing or a credible threat?
Trump added: "Words are very important, and can often lead to unintended consequences, I hope this will not be one of those instances."What is this, posturing or a credible threat?
![]()
White House announces new $200m ballroom - a longtime Trump wish
Donald Trump has been calling for the White House to build a new ballroom for nearly a decade.www.bbc.com
New ballroom to be started at the white house in September. Meant to be a bit of a replica of mar a lago, what a guy doing this for future presidents. Or has intentions of staying in the white house?
he'll look to embed himself
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hsGaj6WFrX0
Interesting trump plays it down when the topic comes up but this is Steve bannon a few months ago that should have anyone thinking it isn’t plausible thinking twice that it at least isn’t in maga’s future plans
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hsGaj6WFrX0
Interesting trump plays it down when the topic comes up but this is Steve bannon a few months ago that should have anyone thinking it isn’t plausible thinking twice that it at least isn’t in maga’s future plans
The Epstein files? He hopes so.Deleted
Deleted
The Climate Change reports?The Epstein files? He hopes so.
Why do people comment on American policies without the first bit of knowledge. Its in regards to Washington DC ie district, not Washington state. Laws are provisioned to allow the Pres to take over the local police. He would have used that authority to deploy NG.Its ironic that the Trumpster declined to deploy the National Guard on Jan 6 when the Capitol was under siege claiming he didn't have the power to do so but today without any valid reason deploys them!
Its ironic that the Trumpster declined to deploy the National Guard on Jan 6 when the Capitol was under siege claiming he didn't have the power to do so but today without any valid reason deploys them!
Excuse my ignorance but what has Washington State got to do with anything currently happening with Trump's admin? J6 occurred in Washington DC and Trump's latest rhetoric is all about DC isn't it? Kash Patel claims the murder rate in DC is at a 30 year low so why the need for the National Guard?Why do people comment on American policies without the first bit of knowledge. Its in regards to Washington DC ie district, not Washington state.
If I read your response correctly you seem to be saying that he can deploy in DC because the law allows but couldn't on Jan 6 because the law didn't allow ... and here I'm not following your argument but assume you to be saying .... because the Capitol is in Washington State and the law doesn't allow it.Why do people comment on American policies without the first bit of knowledge. Its in regards to Washington DC ie district, not Washington state. Laws are provisioned to allow the Pres to take over the local police. He would have used that authority to deploy NG.
The US has states, districts and territories. The laws governing them are separate
100.No real reason to deploy is the best reason.
It normalizes the fascist state.
Fascinating how the same sexist pigs that attacked Adern on here with a woman hating barrage about their freedoms, have nothing to say about it.