How did that play out in reality?
Moa - extinct
Native geese - extinct
Native ducks - extinct
Huia - extinct.
Geez humans hunting animals to extinction, what a shocker.
Come to think of it, wonder where all the Great Auk of Britian disappeared to?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The thread centers on New Zealand's upcoming election, primarily debating the economic management and policy differences between the center-left Labour government and center-right National/ACT opposition. Key criticisms target Labour's fiscal stewardship, citing ballooning government expenditure #7#272, housing unaffordability, and unfulfilled promises like KiwiBuild and dental care expansion #16#12. A user #7 highlighted Labour's annual 9% spending growth versus 1.5% under previous governments, arguing this fueled inflation. National's tax-cut policy faced scrutiny over funding gaps and legality, with user #215 questioning Luxon's reliance on "trust me" assurances.
Leadership competence emerged as a critical theme, particularly in later posts. Luxon drew heavy criticism after a contentious interview where he struggled to defend policy details #194#199#211, while Willis faced backlash for her economic credentials. Hipkins garnered fleeting praise for articulation but was ultimately seen as representing poor governmental outcomes #45#119. A trusted user #308 presented expert economic analysis contradicting Treasury optimism. Infrastructure issues—like Wellington's water crisis and the dental school staffing shortage—were cited as examples of systemic mismanagement #235#12. Notable policy debates included road-user charges for EVs #220, immigration impacts on rents #299, and coalition scenarios involving NZ First #182#258. Early fringe discussions on candidates' rugby allegiances gave way to substantive policy critiques, culminating in grim Treasury forecasts discussed in posts #271#304#308. User #168 also revealed concerns about Labour rushing regulatory changes to entrench policies pre-election.
Economic Policies, Housing Crisis, Leadership Competence
How did that play out in reality?
Moa - extinct
Native geese - extinct
Native ducks - extinct
Huia - extinct.
long-term thinking (intergenerational well-being is a central pillar of Kaupapa māori) esp around sustainability (Guardianship)
Geez humans hunting animals to extinction, what a shocker.
māori were colonisers. They colonised the Moriori and some tribes colonised others at various times.This is the correct take. In Aus and NZ colonialism was a net benefit to the indigenous population.
I wasnt going to touch that one myselfmāori were colonisers. They colonised the Moriori and some tribes colonised others at various times.
Bit of a can of worms with this one, bit of a myth though.māori were colonisers. They colonised the Moriori and some tribes colonised others at various times.
Is the argument about colonisation?I just think the argument against colonisation is like an argument against say, the existence of a mosquito, or how the atomic bomb happened
It just is.
Yes, it could have been done better.
But at the same time, it couldn’t. Because that’s how it happened, for better or worse, for all of us to get to where we are now
Yes, but one tribe imposing themselves on another is colonisation. There are probably very few people or races or ethnicities that have never been colonised. Most races have been colonised multiple times.Bit of a can of worms with this one, bit of a myth though.
A few iwi went to the Chathams and killed off most of the Moriori, who some say were an off shoot of the first Māori to get to the mainland while others say the Moriori were on the Chathams prior.
By all accounts its a combination of both.
Current argument on the streets of Wellington is about the treatyIs the argument about colonisation?
or the treaty and subsequent long history of it being ignored & breached?
I'm not sure what your point is here.Yes, but one tribe imposing themselves on another is colonisation. There are probably very few people or races or ethnicities that have never been colonised. Most races have been colonised multiple times.
They cant cosplay as having a special relationship of conservation. Would you say thats fair?Are you saying any race who ever hunted an animal to extinction can't then claim enviromental guardianship of their homeland?
@MrFrankWhitemāori were colonisers. They colonised the Moriori and some tribes colonised others at various times.
Yeah, ironic for sure. At least they provide some legitimate sources for their information.Is that two Māori givng the history of MoriMori? Don't see the irony in that?
But thanks for the link. Interesting
Is that two Māori givng the history of MoriMori? Don't see the irony in that?
But thanks for the link. Interesting
They cant cosplay as having a special relationship of conservation. Would you say thats fair?
Huh? Im not "going off" anything. A question was asked about co-governance and and answer was given that implied māori have some sort of innate guardianship knowledge. I merely pointed out that doesn't appear to be the case looking at the record.I'd say judging what you think people can choose to be or believe by the actions of long dead ancestors is a slippery slope.
This is an interesting point of view.What if they only ever traded. Wouldn't that also have been a net benefit to both?
Have always found this a little ironic and a bit if revisionist history. Fits much better into todays values but an afterthought in Hunter gatherer survival.They cant cosplay as having a special relationship of conservation. Would you say thats fair?