Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I watched Ford closely.
He runs around like a madman but a lot of it is following the ball across field and being third man in.
He must be super fit, but it would be more sensible to leave others to do their job and conserve his energy so he stops doing exhausted plays.
Definitely didn't pack a sad.
He had the same niggle as last week, and some time in the first half down the Phins end it cut to him getting up slowly and limping back.
Most teams also use their wingers to cart the ball up out of their back end. Can't think of many centres that make bulk yardage metres and certainly not ours, so would be odd if he had 20 carries as game plans/stock sets are pretty well pre-structured.
There's the exceptions who get used more in attack like Herbie, but more of an outlier.
They attacked because they had no one that could kick the goal
So why wouldn't we put a little kick in instead of taking the tackle? One less opportunity for the opposition to use the ball
Yes but replay showed he played it with his foot so....... Klein was on. the mushiesIsn't that what Ford got done for?
I appreciate the genuine discussion.Okay, I accept the challenge:
IMO Ford and Clarke were the engine room throughout last night's game. The man has a V8 motor. If he is not there, a lot of work simply doesn't get done and the 'Phins roll over the top. He knew he was representing Barney and JFH last night and did not shirk the work.
Does that help..?
- During his 68 minutes on the park, Ford made 121 running metres from 17 runs, the 5th highest in the team. (Clarke 166, 18 runs). 1x line break. The other three were our back three though Clarke ran a few more than DWZ.
- He made 46 tackles, a team high (Clark 36). Leka next best, made 40. For the 'Phins only Donoghoe made more - 52. Niukore made 22 as a comparison.
- Across the 2025 NRL season, Ford is ranked 8th most penalties conceded - just below Carrigan and above Tapine.
- His work isn't pretty, and sometimes there is a kind of unco-clumsiness that gives a penalty away but he is continually improving on that. His current average is 0.72 penalties per game.
- With Barney and Fish out of the picture, the team absolutely needs his relentless effort. The upside is way above any liability that comes with him.
Some what. I think the team just reacted off the back of healeys tempo, pace and offloads around the ruck, his play style encourages attack
I think we need ford atm without Barnett. I also think he offers more than the likes of Tanner who is lowkey just a lesser version of Ford.I appreciate the genuine discussion.
Yes, Ford made 46 tackles and ran for 121 metres, but quantity doesn't automatically equal effectiveness. The key for me is impact, how many of those tackles actually stopped momentum? How many of those 17 runs bent the line or forced defensive adjustments? I see him as a plodder.
Being ranked 8th in penalties conceded across the whole NRL is not a good thing. Being close to guys like Carrigan or Tapine doesn’t make it better because those players offer elite value elsewhere. Ford doesn’t.
His penalties and errors cost the team field position and momentum, consistently and especially in tight games where discipline matters most.
Ford had a line break in that game, but that's an exception, not the norm. He’s not known for tackle busts, offloads, or quick plays. In fact his quick plays often end up in errors. He’s essentially a gap filler rather than having any sort of impact on the game
I’ll never knock him for his effort, but sometimes effort isn’t enough. its about execution and impact. If you're running hard but offering minimal post contact metres, and if you're tackling often but not dominating a tackle and being dragged along as a passenger, or letting offloads go, your “engine” doesn’t mean
The argument that “we need him with Barney and Fish out” is more about a lack of depth than a vote of confidence in Ford. He’s filling a gap, a gap he’s not suited for.
I just don’t see his value other than effort. I’d give others a go ahead of him.
Thought our backline had more shape than recent times. We haven’t stripped teams for numbers for a bit like you pointed outTBH the attack was the best since the sharks game? We were running back 50m without a dominant pack. Like when did we see Dallin dive in the corner…twice?
Maybe a bit more time to gel and Egan back will help icing the chances…Cape and Charnz line running practices with TMM and Boyd, Pompey line running on the right
I think they got Marata to play prop but running a bit wider to avoid getting bent?
Hope the troops return soon to lay better platforms
I think your dislike of him maybe discolouring some of what you think he offers. He has more than double the post contact meters of JFH. In fact if he plays next week he will pass all the post contact meters JFH made in the Panthers last year. You also mention line breaks but do you really expect your props to be making many line breaks?I appreciate the genuine discussion.
Yes, Ford made 46 tackles and ran for 121 metres, but quantity doesn't automatically equal effectiveness. The key for me is impact, how many of those tackles actually stopped momentum? How many of those 17 runs bent the line or forced defensive adjustments? I see him as a plodder.
Being ranked 8th in penalties conceded across the whole NRL is not a good thing. Being close to guys like Carrigan or Tapine doesn’t make it better because those players offer elite value elsewhere. Ford doesn’t.
His penalties and errors cost the team field position and momentum, consistently and especially in tight games where discipline matters most.
Ford had a line break in that game, but that's an exception, not the norm. He’s not known for tackle busts, offloads, or quick plays. In fact his quick plays often end up in errors. He’s essentially a gap filler rather than having any sort of impact on the game
I’ll never knock him for his effort, but sometimes effort isn’t enough. its about execution and impact. If you're running hard but offering minimal post contact metres, and if you're tackling often but not dominating a tackle and being dragged along as a passenger, or letting offloads go, your “engine” doesn’t mean
The argument that “we need him with Barney and Fish out” is more about a lack of depth than a vote of confidence in Ford. He’s filling a gap, a gap he’s not suited for.
I just don’t see his value other than effort. I’d give others a go ahead of him.
I only mention the line break as it was mentioned by the poster I quoted.I think your dislike of him maybe discolouring some of what you think he offers. He has more than double the post contact meters of JFH. In fact if he plays next week he will pass all the post contact meters JFH made in the Panthers last year. You also mention line breaks but do you really expect your props to be making many line breaks?
Is he a starting prop? Not really but having a player like him on the bench who can play big minutes and cover middle and edge makes him a useful player to have.
He took great happiness from the story about the Wahs losing again… after he opened with NPC wank wank
I think you are overrating Bunty here. There is many a reason he has averaged less than 30 minutes ever since Webster has taken over.I only mention the line break as it was mentioned by the poster I quoted.
I think he’s a perfect bench player.
I don’t disagree at all. What I disagree with is him being applauded for a quantity of work that doesn’t impact the game.
Bunty Afoa is someone who I think is a fringe first grader, but he hits hard and has the ability to dominate a tackle. By comparison I don’t think Ford does. Bunty would produce similar output per minute played but would impact ten game more. He can bend the line, he can stop a defender.
All I’m saying is having a lot of something doesn’t equal good.
PCM is definitely a stat I like but again, does JFH offer more in other areas to impact a game? I’d say so.
With us a major competitor for NZ rugby, I’m sure he gets a tickle when we loseSavilles a mug. Typical NZ union sycophant.
Ford is a hard player to tackle. He has limbs swinging and his body contorting at odd angles coupled with a crippled racehorse looking running gait.Okay, I accept the challenge:
IMO Ford and Clarke were the engine room throughout last night's game. The man has a V8 motor. If he is not there, a lot of work simply doesn't get done and the 'Phins roll over the top. He knew he was representing Barney and JFH last night and did not shirk the work.
Does that help..?
- During his 68 minutes on the park, Ford made 121 running metres from 17 runs, the 5th highest in the team. (Clarke 166, 18 runs). 1x line break. The other three were our back three though Clarke ran a few more than DWZ.
- He made 46 tackles, a team high (Clark 36). Leka next best, made 40. For the 'Phins only Donoghoe made more - 52. Niukore made 22 as a comparison.
- Across the 2025 NRL season, Ford is ranked 8th most penalties conceded - just below Carrigan and above Tapine.
- His work isn't pretty, and sometimes there is a kind of unco-clumsiness that gives a penalty away but he is continually improving on that. His current average is 0.72 penalties per game.
- With Barney and Fish out of the picture, the team absolutely needs his relentless effort. The upside is way above any liability that comes with him.