Recruitment Warriors 2025/2026 Recruitment & Retention

Warriors 2025/2026 Recruitment & Retention Discussion
-Player20252026202720282029
1Bunty Afoa
2Tom Ale
3Mitchell Barnett
4Rocco Berry
5Tanah Boyd
6Kurt Capewell
7Erin Clark
8Wayde Egan
9James Fisher-Harris
10Jackson Ford
11Leka Halasima
12Morgan Harper
13Chanel Harris-Tavita
14Sam Healey
15Edward Kosi
16Jacob Laban
17Ali Leiataua
18Freddy Lussick
19Te Maire Martin
20Luke Metcalf
21Charnze Nicoll-Klokstad
22Marata Niukore
23Adam Pompey
24Tanner Stowers-Smith
25Taine Tuaupiki
26Roger Tuivasa-Sheck
27Demitric Vaimauga
28Dallin Watene-Zelezniak
S1Kayliss FatialofaS
S2Kalani GoingS
S3Luke HansonS
S4Eddie Ieremia-ToeavaS
S5Sio KaliS
S6Patrick MoimoiS
-Kahu CapperTT
-Jett ClearyTSS
-Morgan Gannon-
-Jye Linnane-
-Motu PasikalaT??
C = Club option, M = Mutual option, P = Player option, S = Supplementary contract, T = Train & Trial contract

Confirmed Top 30 2025: 28/30
Confirmed Supplementary 2025: 6/6

Confirmed Top 30 2026: 25/30
Confirmed Supplementary 2026: 1/6

2026 Gains: Jye Linnane (Newcastle Knights), Morgan Gannon (Leeds Rhinos)
2026 Losses: Nil

Off Contract: Bunty Afoa, Tom Ale, Morgan Harper, Edward Kosi, Te Maire Martin, Tanner Stowers-Smith
Off Contract from 01/11/25 🐻: Rocco Berry, Tanah Boyd, Kurt Capewell, Chanel Harris-Tavita, Freddy Lussick, Luke Metcalf, Marata Niukore, Taine Tuaupiki, Roger Tuivasa-Sheck



This thread is solely for Warriors recruitment and retention discussion. Any posts not related to the above will be deleted.

Repeat offenders will have their access to this page limited.

Please be mindful of what you are posting in this thread before clicking the reply button. Zero Tolerance to offtopic chat.
 
Last edited:

Enjoyed reading that.

I was having the same thought experiment in the doldrums of Bye week.....how do we avoid another 2024 where aged legends were kept on too long?

The unavoidable conclusion is that it falls on the coaches shoulders to make the tough calls and not select the 2024 SJs or Tohus.....to take a gamble and go with Metcalf at seven last year next to CHT as an example, imagine where we would be this year had that call been made?

I am not blaming Webster, none of us have a crystal ball, how do you tell if SJs slow down is gonner stay a thing for the whole of 2024 or whether next week he rediscovers past form? you can't, no one knows when that moment comes.

And imagine parking SJ in favor of the efforts we have seen from 2025 Metcalf at half last season....sorry but that would be a PR disaster since Metcalf was not as fluid in attack as 2024 SJ and Metcalf was not gonna kick that drop goal that wins the clincher.

But hey, look at Metcalf now, he is flying and arguably surpassing 2024 SJ, but lets not forget it took several rounds of risk to find out he could do it, props to Webster for believing.

So who is looking like the next legend that may be getting too old?

I would say attention has to go on Barnett, while in career best form pre ACL there is no guarantee he comes back the same player, there is a reason there is a user on this site that is called Tohus Knees.

A brave call by Webster would be to give Barnett a capped time limit when he returns to prove he can recapture his past form....look you don't have to sack the guy....an example of succession planning in this sample would be keeping Barnett even if his knee is shot, while having the courage to demote him to back up forward behind someone like Crosby....the next prop youngun star (calm down you Barnett lovers this is a succession discussion and I am making a narrative purely to make a point over what actually might be).
Always difficult decision
But ya can’t keep everyone
All the time
Someone moves on
Another era begins
Enjoy what’s happening right now in 2025
The rest will take care of itself
Out of our control 🤪
 
I would back that up. The Warriors are certainly well liked by league fans where I live in Queensland.
Liked because we give a tough game and liked because we give up an easy 2 points are quite different, though!

Warriors Recruitment will certainly be enhanced by proof that coming here doesn't cruel S o O Selection chances. Indeed, it may enchance those chances.

I think it's actually significant that Luke's become a new daddy here, rather than coming here from Sydney, his wife/partner becomes pregnant and Luke or his agent then uttering the words " released on compassionate grounds" in Cameron's office, which has been the typical scenario.
 
Enjoyed reading that.

I was having the same thought experiment in the doldrums of Bye week.....how do we avoid another 2024 where aged legends were kept on too long?

The unavoidable conclusion is that it falls on the coaches shoulders to make the tough calls and not select the 2024 SJs or Tohus.....to take a gamble and go with Metcalf at seven last year next to CHT as an example, imagine where we would be this year had that call been made?

I am not blaming Webster, none of us have a crystal ball, how do you tell if SJs slow down is gonner stay a thing for the whole of 2024 or whether next week he rediscovers past form? you can't, no one knows when that moment comes.

And imagine parking SJ in favor of the efforts we have seen from 2025 Metcalf at half last season....sorry but that would be a PR disaster since Metcalf was not as fluid in attack as 2024 SJ and Metcalf was not gonna kick that drop goal that wins the clincher.

But hey, look at Metcalf now, he is flying and arguably surpassing 2024 SJ, but lets not forget it took several rounds of risk to find out he could do it, props to Webster for believing.

So who is looking like the next legend that may be getting too old?

I would say attention has to go on Barnett, while in career best form pre ACL there is no guarantee he comes back the same player, there is a reason there is a user on this site that is called Tohus Knees.

A brave call by Webster would be to give Barnett a capped time limit when he returns to prove he can recapture his past form....look you don't have to sack the guy....an example of succession planning in this sample would be keeping Barnett even if his knee is shot, while having the courage to demote him to back up forward behind someone like Crosby....the next prop youngun star (calm down you Barnett lovers this is a succession discussion and I am making a narrative purely to make a point over what actually might be).
Well now is the perfect time to see what life without Barnett looks like.

Yes you bring him back into the fold next year. But this will be a great test for the youngsters.

But Barnett gets to fight his way back into this team, he's a legend.
 
I know that the "Up the Wahs" movement has seen a huge increase in support of league but this surprised me.
Hope our recruiters were out there talent spotting.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A-L7LuDUZH0


What surprised you?

Was it the crowd?

This isn't typical of first 15 rugby. This is a 100+ year rivalry between Kings College & Auckland Grammar.

As a former pupil of one of these schools it was mandatory to attend haha but we wanted to anyway.
 
Most of our forward depth is in the back row though. There's still room for some more middle depth. I wouldn't mind looking at bringing Tof Sipley back home. He might welcome a chance of scenery from the unhappiness that is Manly at present.
 
Most of our forward depth is in the back row though. There's still room for some more middle depth. I wouldn't mind looking at bringing Tof Sipley back home. He might welcome a chance of scenery from the unhappiness that is Manly at present.
Ale and Afoa can’t even make grade, even when we were without Barnett. Crosby, TSS and Salalilo are certain quality first grade props in the making imo.
We need backs if anything. Hopefully Amituanai and Kali can be them
 
Last edited:
To be fair the Broncos fans are right, everybody hates them including me.
They are a good example of the Tribalism in the NRL, the QLD team vs the rest yadda yadda.

Also when they were under Bennett their Salary cap looked smelly (basically the Origin side). Their fans are reknowned for being arrogant.

We (you and Mr Brownstain) are talking across purposes.

I agree that the Warriors enjoy neutral fan support. Unlike the Broncos fans. That accusation of behaving like them is not me.

Also I said I did not agree with everything the original poster said.

My point and the original posters point was in regards to the Australian coverage of the Warriors.

You and Mr Brownstain are talking about fan perceptions.

The Original poster who Mr Brownstain called a victim was talking about the tone of the Australian media.

You yourself have posted many times that the Australian medias job is to concentrate on Australian perspectives and that Kiwis need to deal with it.

I said that they do this and I said "Rightly".

Which is why I also said I do not agree with everything the Original poster said.

However Mr Brownstain has a history of calling people victims when their opinions do not align with his own world view....which in this case was frankly wrong.

As the Original poster claimed the media over there will talk about our achievements with an Australian spin on them. This is no different say to the New Zealand habit in Union our more successful code of saying our coaches overseas are why those countries have done well.

This is a fact, they do say RTS brought his Roosters standards to the Warriors (a point the original poster 'victim'lol made)

The Aussie Media do talk about the Warriors benefiting from the Penrith influences here.

This attitude is as old as the competition itself....as Rabs Warren said back in 2002 during the intro for the Sharks vs Warriors semifinal "has there ever been a more despised finalists in the history of the competition".

Personally I like the rhetoric, I like all their tribal "Origin is the highest form of the sport" bullshit coz like Blockers "the big Warriors forwards are tiring " or like (insert random Fox Sports expert) will say when the Warriors win "Their big pack is hard to contain and that unpredictable style they play throwing offloads is a winner" .

Bottom line, their fans over the ditch like us, their Experts in their media talk about us through an Aussie lense fact.

No posters should be called out as victims by Mr Brownstain for an opinion about the tone of the Aussie media, because that is un called for.

Let me be very clear here, I do not think the Aussie media hate us either....I think they are indifferent and apathetic because we have been so poor for so long, that it is beyond them to take us too seriously....apart from those pockets where we are flavor of the month.

And I am cool with that, does that make me a victim?

Anywho on matters of recruitment, I am finding it really hard to get any Superleague coverage of our guy over there.
To be fair the Broncos fans are right, everybody hates them including me.
They are a good example of the Tribalism in the NRL, the QLD team vs the rest yadda yadda.

Also when they were under Bennett their Salary cap looked smelly (basically the Origin side). Their fans are reknowned for being arrogant.

We (you and Mr Brownstain) are talking across purposes.

I agree that the Warriors enjoy neutral fan support. Unlike the Broncos fans. That accusation of behaving like them is not me.

Also I said I did not agree with everything the original poster said.

My point and the original posters point was in regards to the Australian coverage of the Warriors.

You and Mr Brownstain are talking about fan perceptions.

The Original poster who Mr Brownstain called a victim was talking about the tone of the Australian media.

You yourself have posted many times that the Australian medias job is to concentrate on Australian perspectives and that Kiwis need to deal with it.

I said that they do this and I said "Rightly".

Which is why I also said I do not agree with everything the Original poster said.

However Mr Brownstain has a history of calling people victims when their opinions do not align with his own world view....which in this case was frankly wrong.

As the Original poster claimed the media over there will talk about our achievements with an Australian spin on them. This is no different say to the New Zealand habit in Union our more successful code of saying our coaches overseas are why those countries have done well.

This is a fact, they do say RTS brought his Roosters standards to the Warriors (a point the original poster 'victim'lol made)

The Aussie Media do talk about the Warriors benefiting from the Penrith influences here.

This attitude is as old as the competition itself....as Rabs Warren said back in 2002 during the intro for the Sharks vs Warriors semifinal "has there ever been a more despised finalists in the history of the competition".

Personally I like the rhetoric, I like all their tribal "Origin is the highest form of the sport" bullshit coz like Blockers "the big Warriors forwards are tiring " or like (insert random Fox Sports expert) will say when the Warriors win "Their big pack is hard to contain and that unpredictable style they play throwing offloads is a winner" .

Bottom line, their fans over the ditch like us, their Experts in their media talk about us through an Aussie lense fact.

No posters should be called out as victims by Mr Brownstain for an opinion about the tone of the Aussie media, because that is un called for.

Let me be very clear here, I do not think the Aussie media hate us either....I think they are indifferent and apathetic because we have been so poor for so long, that it is beyond them to take us too seriously....apart from those pockets where we are flavor of the month.

And I am cool with that, does that make me a victim?

Anywho on matters of recruitment, I am finding it really hard to get any Superleague coverage of our guy over there.
First time I've watched Gannon play on the weekend. He scored a solo try one off the ruck (albeit against some pretty tired players in the 79th minute) showing a quick turn of foot and a step to beat a defender from about 15-20m out. For the first half of the game he was quite involved, ran well and broke a few tackles and got a few offloads away. Seemed to drift off a bit in the second stanza. His stats were - 109m gained, 1 LB assist, 3 offloads, 1 try, 5 tackle breaks. 29 tackles, 6 missed.

Small sample size but overall was impressed with his speed, ability to bend the line and break a tackle. Looked dangerous on most possessions he had.

Definitely see why he is being discussed as a ball playing lock. Nice passing game. Got a good offload away around the corner of a defender to get a LB assist.

6 Missed tackles 2 games in a row is a worry
 
Last edited:
    Nobody is reading this thread right now.
Back
Top Bottom