I only choose F as G wasn't available.> 56% rated the game an F-????
And they say we have some of the best fans![]()
All youse quoting Shakespeare and Winston Churchill before the game… then F-?![]()
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I only choose F as G wasn't available.> 56% rated the game an F-????
And they say we have some of the best fans![]()
All youse quoting Shakespeare and Winston Churchill before the game… then F-?![]()
We are very smart league analysts…You think 4 points would have been enough to win it?
We take the 2:0 lead and punish their mistakes and make them kick off, instead of attacking in the redzone like headless chickens as usual which ended with a long range try down the other endLook I was like "prove me wrong" boys and they kinda blew up in their faces
We are very smart league analysts…
… in hindsight!
Yet Capewell and Niukore haven't cracked 100m this year either... In fact Vaimunga with 29 minutes against the Tigers got better meters than anything Niukore has produced and only 1 meter less than Capewell's best this year. Capewell played 80minutes to get that. I don't mind that they build their minutes but it is a bit of a piss take to say they Vaimunga hasn't made a 100m when our starting backrower can't do the same with more minutes. You diminish them with shit like that when they are the players they are really putting in.Unpopular opinion - I think what Webby is doing with Leka and Vaumunga is spot on.
Both are showing really great signs and are building, with both likely to see a bit more game time with Fish out.
I don't think either are doing enough to say you would replace then for anyone in the starting 13.
Leka has made 100m once this year (because he had a 70m break) and Vaimunga hasn't yet. Imo Webby's doing the right thing, letting the experienced players take the sting out of the match before giving these 2 a run. I think as the year goes on we'll see them get more game time, and will come on earlier or at different moments.
Let them build and continue to develop. 15-25 games this year figuring out their roles before they hit the ground running next year.
Yet Capewell and Niukore haven't cracked 100m this year either... In fact Vaimunga with 29 minutes against the Tigers got better meters than anything Niukore has produced and only 1 meter less than Capewell's best this year. Capewell played 80minutes to get that. I don't mind that they build their minutes but it is a bit of a piss take to say they Vaimunga hasn't made a 100m when our starting backrower can't do the same with more minutes. You diminish them with shit like that when they are the players they are really putting in.
Well it's a C or F. There is no in-between. C means a pass and they did not pass.
The 4020 rule is right up there with my dislike of Melbourne now
Which makes me question if we want to bring in two amateur wingers... Reynold's kicking game is top 3 in the game at the moment. So I'm sure he'd pick them being out of position pretty quickly. People forget that 40/20s are nearly impossible to force and are only possible because of bad wingers positioning. Of which TT has proven 40/20s don't happen on his side. And TMM is not inexperienced as a fullback at all.
Capewell top of the stats this yearBest part of the game was watching these two and Bunty. I could not take my eyes off them every time they were on the screen. Man crush on full alert
Biggest let down was Capewell - some really rubbish passes and play from him. Looks like an old man out there.
Ford was another huge disappointment. Webby needs to make these senior blokes accountable. They let the team down.
Would need a bigger sample than to automatically lay the blame entirely with him. Have multiple sides targeted his edge so far this season? Was a returning Rocco Berry a factor of them targeting that side with them recognising a limited game time and cohesion on that side?
Is Rocco more of a legs tackler than a dominant one?Would need a bigger sample than to automatically lay the blame entirely with him. Have multiple sides targeted his edge so far this season? Was a returning Rocco Berry a factor of them targeting that side with them recognising a limited game time and cohesion on that side?
At the moment I think so, but it’s tough after a long layoff to expect it to just connect seamlessly I guess? Still think it was the wrong game to bring him back. Regarding the Capewell missed tackles, the statistic is fairly self explanatory, but the calibre of players also on that list says there’s probably more to it than meets the eye. I the game against storm, when you look at a majority of Papenhuyzen’s conversations, they were closer to the middle. I think it’s as simple as them identifying the loss in JFH and targeting Ford and Capewell