User Blog Riverina Pub - Winning percentages analysis for selected Warriors

Blog Topic
  1. Sports
1731211932350.png



The Riverina Pub in combination with me working with ChatGPT to analyse the results presents Winning percentages of selected players.

How much can we read into Winning percentages ?

Well the answer right off the bat is nothing due to the small sample sizes meaning that any differences are within the confidence intervals or margin for error.

So I won’t be analysing this from a statistical perspective other than to note that these analysis are illustrative and cautioning to bear the small sample sizes in mind.

The method I am going to take is to list the season winning record for a team and then explore certain players of interest to explore how their winning record compared. Seasons where the player played only one or two games have been eliminated.

Player One Tanah Boyd

Minimum games per season three
Tanah Boyd
TeamYearAppearancesPlayer Winning %Team Winning %Delta
Gold Coast
2020​
13​
46.15%​
40.00%​
6.15%​
5.9995​
Gold Coast
2021​
6​
50%​
41.67%​
8.33%​
3​
Gold Coast
2022​
18​
22.22%​
25.00%​
-2.78%​
3.9996​
Gold Coast
2023​
21​
38.10%​
37.50%​
0.60%​
8.001​
Gold Coast
2024​
9​
22.22%​
33.33%​
-11.11%​
1.9998​
Player Weighted averageTeam AverageDelta
67​
34.3%​
35.50%​
-1.17%​
22.9999​


TMM



TMM
TeamYearAppearancesPlayer Winning %Team Winning %Delta
Penrith
2016​
6​
50%​
52.94%​
-2.94%​
Penrith
2017​
7​
28.57%​
50.00%​
-21.43%​
Cowboys
2017​
12​
58.33%​
66.67%​
-8.34%​
Cowboys
2018​
23​
30.43%​
26.32%​
4.11%​
Cowboys
2019​
7​
28.57%​
36.84%​
-8.27%​
Broncos
2022​
13​
61.54%​
59.09%​
2.45%​
Warriors
2023​
9​
44.44%​
66.67%​
-22.23%​
Warriors
2024​
16​
37.50%​
37.50%​
0.00%​
Player Weighted averageTeam AverageDelta
93​
46.23%​
49.50%​
-3.28%​


Metcalf

Luke Metcalf
TeamYearAppearancesPlayer Winning %Team Winning %Delta
Sharks
2021​
6​
33.00%​
41.67%​
-8.67%​
Warriors
2023​
12​
83.33%​
66.67%​
16.66%​
Warriors
2024​
7​
42.86%​
37.50%​
5.36%​
Player Weighted averageTeam AverageDelta
25​
59.9%​
48.61%​
11.31%​




CHT
TeamYearAppearancesPlayer Winning %Team Winning %Delta
Warriors
2019​
13​
23%​
36.84%​
-13.76%​
Warriors
2020​
13​
30.77%​
40.00%​
-9.23%​
Warriors
2021​
11​
36%​
33.33%​
3.03%​
Warriors
2022​
17​
23.53%​
25.00%​
-1.47%​
Warriors
2024​
17​
41.18%​
37.50%​
3.68%​
Player Weighted averageTeam AverageDelta
71​
31.0%​
34.54%​
-3.55%​


CHTPast 3 years onlyPlayer Weighted averageTeam AverageDelta
45​
33.3%​
31.94%​
1.39%​






Clark not Clarke
TeamYearAppearancesPlayer Winning %Team Winning %Delta
Gold Coast
2020​
10​
50.00%​
40.00%​
10.00%​
Gold Coast
2021​
19​
36.84%​
41.67%​
-4.83%​
Gold Coast
2022​
21​
19.05%​
25.00%​
-5.95%​
Gold Coast
2023​
20​
40.00%​
37.50%​
2.50%​
Gold Coast
2024​
24​
33.33%​
33.33%​
0.00%​
Player Weighted averageTeam AverageDelta
94​
34.04%​
35.50%​
-1.46%​





GENERAL OBSERVATIONS PLAYER BY PLAYER

Tanah Boyd

Tanah Boyd
has played several seasons with the Gold Coast Titans, and his win-loss record reflects some of the challenges faced by the team during those years. Over the course of his five seasons, Boyd has posted a player win percentage of 34.3%, which is slightly below the team's average of 35.5%. The Delta of -1.17% suggests that Boyd’s individual performance has not significantly deviated from the team's success—his contribution to wins has been close to what would be expected from the team’s general performance. Boyd’s 2020 season saw him post a 46.15% win rate, which was above the team’s 40%, signaling that he contributed positively to the team’s overall success. However, this was followed by a 2021 season where he posted a 50% win percentage, slightly outpacing the team’s 41.67%.

In contrast, Boyd’s performance in 2022 was less favorable, with a personal win percentage of just 22.22%, which was far below the team’s 25%. His 2023 and 2024 performances showed improvement, with 38.10% and 22.22% win percentages, respectively, though both still lagged behind the team’s averages. It’s worth noting that Boyd has been part of a team that’s consistently struggled in terms of overall performance, especially in seasons where they failed to make the finals. Despite this, Boyd has remained an important player for the Titans, contributing in key moments, but his individual record suggests he’s yet to make a game-changing difference on a consistent basis.

The weighted average of 34.3% highlights Boyd’s steady but unremarkable contribution to the team’s overall win rate. His slightly negative Delta points to the fact that, while Boyd hasn't necessarily been a major factor in the Titans' wins, he has also avoided being a liability during their losses.


Te Maire Martin

Te Maire Martin
has had a more varied career with different clubs, and his individual win percentage reflects the ups and downs of playing for teams with differing levels of success. Over the course of four seasons and a total of 93 appearances, Te Maire Martin has accumulated a personal win percentage of 46.23%, slightly below his teams' collective win rate of 49.5%. This negative Delta of -3.28% suggests that, on average, Te Maire Martin has underperformed compared to his teams’ overall success. While this difference is not substantial, it indicates that Te Maire Martin’s teams have often won more games than he personally contributed to, which could be indicative of his involvement in games that the team managed to win despite his individual performance or vice versa.

Breaking down his performance by season, Te Maire Martin’s 2016 and 2017 seasons were marked by a lower win rate relative to his teams, particularly during his time with Penrith in 2017, where he posted just 28.57%, far below the team’s 50% win rate. In contrast, his 2018 season with the Cowboys saw a turnaround, as he posted a 30.43% win percentage, slightly outpacing the team’s 26.32%—a rare instance where Te Maire Martin managed to perform above the team’s poor record.

By 2022, with the Broncos, Te Maire Martin showed more promise, with a 61.54% win rate, outperforming the team's 59.09% record. Unfortunately, this improvement wasn’t sustained in his following years, with the Warriors in 2023 and 2024 posting 44.44% and 37.5% win rates, respectively. His performance in these years again aligned closely with the team’s record, suggesting that while Te Maire Martin is a reliable player, he hasn’t been able to dramatically alter the outcome of matches for his teams.

Te Maire Martin’s weighted average of 46.23% is reflective of a career that has had more struggles than successes in terms of win percentage. While his teams have generally fared better than his individual performance suggests, Te Maire Martin has been consistent enough to not significantly drag down his teams.


Luke Metcalf

Luke Metcalf
has had an interesting career trajectory, with two seasons in the NRL so far and a high level of success in his limited appearances. Over his two seasons with the Warriors (2023 and 2024), he has posted an impressive win percentage of 59.9%, well above the team’s average of 48.61%. This positive Delta of 11.31% indicates that Metcalf has consistently outperformed his team, contributing significantly to their success over the course of his appearances. His performance in 2023 with the Warriors stands out, where he posted an 83.33% win rate, well above the team’s 66.67% win percentage that season. This strong showing is a testament to his ability to influence matches and make a tangible impact, especially in tight games.

In 2024, Metcalf’s win percentage was 42.86%, still higher than the Warriors’ 37.5% for the season, though the team’s overall struggles that year meant his individual performance couldn’t carry them to greater success. Nevertheless, Metcalf’s ability to maintain a higher win percentage than the team’s suggests he has a positive impact on the field, even if the team’s overall record is lackluster.

Metcalf’s weighted average of 59.9% highlights him as a player who has outperformed his team and is one of the few players in this analysis to consistently achieve above-average results in terms of win percentage. His performance, especially in key moments, indicates that he has been an important and reliable contributor to the Warriors’ efforts, making him a player to watch as his career progresses.


CHT (Chanel Harris-Tavita)

Chanel Harris-Tavita
has experienced a career marked by inconsistency, particularly in his win-loss record with the Warriors. His overall personal win percentage of 31.0% is well below the team’s average of 34.54%, highlighting that, on the whole, he has struggled to achieve wins at a rate comparable to his teammates. His Delta of -3.55% reflects this trend, suggesting that his individual performances have generally been less successful than the team’s collective results.

In 2019, CHT posted a win percentage of just 23%, far below the team’s 36.84%, and his 2020 and 2022 seasons were similarly marked by subpar performances, with win percentages of 30.77% and 23.53%, respectively. These figures indicate that he has been part of a Warriors team that has faced challenges, particularly in the early years of his career. However, there was a slight improvement in 2021 when his win percentage rose to 36%, which was above the team’s 33.33%.

Additionally, if we focus specifically on his last three years, as shown in the additional table, CHT’s performance is far more encouraging. From 2022-2024, his weighted average is 33.3%, which is an improvement over his earlier years, and significantly higher than his earlier win rates. In 2024, CHT posted a 41.18% win percentage, which was above the Warriors' 37.50% team record. This recent improvement highlights that CHT has gradually become a more effective and consistent contributor as he has gained more experience in the NRL. His positive Delta in these last few years suggests that CHT has started to become a more reliable player and his early struggles as a 19-year-old rookie are now behind him.


Erin Clark

Erin Clark
, like many players on the Gold Coast Titans, has seen fluctuating results in terms of individual and team success. Over his five seasons with the Titans, Clark has posted a personal win percentage of 34.04%, which is very close to the team average of 35.50%. This small negative Delta of -1.46% indicates that, on average, Clark has been a player who performs roughly in line with the team’s overall success, without significantly outshining or underperforming relative to his teammates.

In 2020, Clark posted a 50% win rate, which was well above the team’s 40%, signaling that he contributed positively to the team’s success that season. However, his performance dipped in 2021 and 2022, with win percentages of 36.84% and 19.05%, respectively, both of which were below the team’s average for those years. In 2023, Clark rebounded with a 40% win rate, slightly outperforming the team’s 37.50%. His most recent season in 2024 was notable in that he played every game of the season for the Titans which indicates he is a reliable player from an injury perspective.



Wrighty’s Hot Take

The above general observations were the on the surface ones typed up by Chat GPT. What is my deeper take?

Firstly I can’t stress enough the small sample sizes so there is nothing conclusive to comment on. Instead I am going to use the phrase “there is evidence to suggest”.

So there is evidence to suggest the following:

  • Luke Metcalf already is and is going to be a point of difference and an asset in games. I define an asset as being someone who can change a game rather than being a steady eddie or neutral player who won’t let you down. He is off to a fast start and should be regarded as our number one ranked half going into next year.
  • Our second ranked half based on his last three years delta only, if you ignore his rookie years, is CHT. This was a surprise finding to me. You may still not want to start him though as we need a goal kicker. And he has shown that can’t be him..
  • Our third ranked half is Tanah Boyd based on his career delta. He can goal kick though so maybe that gets him the nod over CHT as there wasn’t much between them.
  • Strangely TMM showed up last if we are only judging CHT on his last three years. His delta of -3.55% wasn’t far off the pace which still puts him in the steady Eddie category and as being a neutral player rather than positioning him as a liability. However he of all the players measured is the closest to being a liability.
  • Clark not Clarke ie our new addition from the Gold Coast Titans. He will be a steady Eddie player for the Warriors and not score game winning tries or move the needle on our winning percentage based on his career delta. He will be an honest tryer though and his delta is respectable even though very slightly in the negative.
Your thoughts as experts on the Warriors and Rugby League what do you make of this data apart from the obvious that the sample sizes are small and we can’t be conclusive?
 

Attachments

  • 1731211838650.png
    1731211838650.png
    855.4 KB · Views: 0
Great in depth analysis!

A few comments:

Seasons where a player plays 10+ games should only be included in this sort of analysis.
- a ‘bit’ player (less than 10 games) is only filling in a role, hasn’t had a preseason built around them, hasn’t got the combinations and the play will usually be built away from the ‘bit’ player
- a ‘bit’ player with a handful of games in many cases may be used on the reserves bench and be somewhat irrelevant to influencing the game outcome
- fill ins results usually favour X factor and creative players that can have immediate impact outside the team structure over players that build their game on structure.
- Over a longer season a great fill in could have a very different result when needing to playing to more structure. As the fill in they have limited ball, less pressure and more freedom. As as key player building the combinations around, they will play significantly differently and influence the result more.

Based on the above I would have Boyd as number 1 half and I think the jury is still out on Metcalf…. Potential but not proven over a full season yet.
 
NZWarriors.com
Great in depth analysis!

A few comments:

Seasons where a player plays 10+ games should only be included in this sort of analysis.
- a ‘bit’ player (less than 10 games) is only filling in a role, hasn’t had a preseason built around them, hasn’t got the combinations and the play will usually be built away from the ‘bit’ player
- a ‘bit’ player with a handful of games in many cases may be used on the reserves bench and be somewhat irrelevant to influencing the game outcome
- fill ins results usually favour X factor and creative players that can have immediate impact outside the team structure over players that build their game on structure.
- Over a longer season a great fill in could have a very different result when needing to playing to more structure. As the fill in they have limited ball, less pressure and more freedom. As as key player building the combinations around, they will play significantly differently and influence the result more.

Based on the above I would have Boyd as number 1 half and I think the jury is still out on Metcalf…. Potential but not proven over a full season yet.
Tanah Boyd rep'd at 7 for Titans in the off season. The opened the season with him there in 2024 and he went 0-6 and got sent into the sun by Des. Got one or two run ons off the bench in what was a disaster of a year for him. His confidence will be low right now. He played less than 10 games but those games should count.
 
Tanah Boyd rep'd at 7 for Titans in the off season. The opened the season with him there in 2024 and he went 0-6 and got sent into the sun by Des. Got one or two run ons off the bench in what was a disaster of a year for him. His confidence will be low right now. He played less than 10 games but those games should count.
Why in your opinion was 2024 such an outlier for Boyd compared with previous seasons?

Des changing the structure which didn’t suit Boyd?

Another point, for the sake of conversation, should winning percentage be a factor as well as delta? Ie for Boyd, despite my backing his delta stats, he still has a history of not knowing how to win which is a bigger issue for me. Metcalf and TMM are winners and are better ‘cogs in the wheel’, irrespective of how they personally contribute?
 
NZWarriors.com
Advertisement
If you would like to remove these advertisements, please do so by registering a free account
Tanah Boyd rep'd at 7 for Titans in the off season. The opened the season with him there in 2024 and he went 0-6 and got sent into the sun by Des. Got one or two run ons off the bench in what was a disaster of a year for him. His confidence will be low right now. He played less than 10 games but those games should count.
The Titans were smashed with injuries to start the season - David Fifita and Jayden Campbell’s out then Tino Fa’asuamaleaui, ruptured his ACL.

After that 6 game horror start to the season (which could be attributed to injuries) he won 2/3 later in the season for 66% 😉
 
Interesting but far to many variables to draw any real conclusions from it. Quality of team mates, injuries, home or away games, quality of opposition, actual personal contributions in the games, position played etc etc
 
Interesting but far to many variables to draw any real conclusions from it. Quality of team mates, injuries, home or away games, quality of opposition, actual personal contributions in the games, position played etc etc
Exactly why stats are a waste of time in regards to football.
EG hit ups off your own line are much more valuable than those in attack.
Imo.
 
NZWarriors.com
Advertisement
If you would like to remove these advertisements, please do so by registering a free account
Why in your opinion was 2024 such an outlier for Boyd compared with previous seasons?

Des changing the structure which didn’t suit Boyd?

Another point, for the sake of conversation, should winning percentage be a factor as well as delta? Ie for Boyd, despite my backing his delta stats, he still has a history of not knowing how to win which is a bigger issue for me. Metcalf and TMM are winners and are better ‘cogs in the wheel’, irrespective of how they personally contribute?
I will come back to why 2024 start of the year was bad for the Titans.
But first I want to make two different posts to answer your second question about should we factor in player winning record as well as delta - here first of all is chatGPT with an interesting answer then I will answer with Wrighty's hot take.

That’s an excellent point and one that I think adds depth to the discussion. You're essentially raising the distinction between individual contribution to wins (as reflected in delta) versus team success and the ability to influence the outcome of games, regardless of personal performance.

Winning Percentage vs. Delta: Two Different Dimensions

  1. Winning Percentage is, as you mentioned, a broader measure of how much a player’s team wins while they are on the field, but it can be influenced by many factors—like team strength, the players around them, and their role on the team. A high winning percentage could reflect being in a successful team, but it doesn’t necessarily tell you how much the player personally contributes to those victories. For example, a "cog in the wheel" player like TMM might not have the highest individual win percentage, but if his team is consistently winning and he contributes in key moments, it shows that he is playing a role in that success.
  2. Delta, on the other hand, highlights how much a player’s individual win percentage deviates from their team’s average, essentially showing how much personal contribution they make. A positive delta means the player is outperforming their team’s success, while a negative delta means they are underperforming relative to their team. However, delta doesn’t capture leadership qualities or other intangible aspects of being a "winner"—like influencing the outcome of critical moments, mental toughness, or clutch performances.

Boyd's Case (and the "History of Not Knowing How to Win")

You bring up Boyd’s history of struggling to win as a key issue. The point here is that despite a relatively neutral delta, Boyd has been part of a Gold Coast Titans team that hasn’t been able to string together consistent success. His overall win percentage (34.3%) and the dip in seasons like 2022 (22.22%) signal that, over his career, the team’s performance has been less than stellar. While his delta doesn’t suggest that he’s a massive drag on the team’s success, it doesn’t necessarily highlight him as a key player in helping his team win consistently.

  • Key question: Does Boyd struggle to influence the outcome of games in a way that lifts the team, or does he contribute to the team’s failures? While his delta suggests he’s neither a massive contributor to wins nor a detractor, the "mental side" of winning games, as you’ve suggested, may point to an underlying issue. If Boyd hasn’t been able to turn the tide in tight games or perform in clutch moments, that could be a concern, especially in a team that’s lacked consistent success like the Titans.

Metcalf and TMM as 'Winners'

Metcalf and TMM, on the other hand, seem to fit the profile of players who have been on successful teams and contributed to their victories, either through clutch performances or consistently being part of winning teams. The fact that Metcalf has consistently outperformed his team (as seen in his positive delta) suggests that he is capable of stepping up in key moments. His individual performance, particularly in 2023 (83.33% win percentage), reflects his ability to influence results, even when his team isn't at their absolute best.

Similarly, TMM’s delta isn't stellar, but he’s been part of successful teams (particularly in 2022 with the Broncos). The question here is whether, despite not having a standout delta, he’s someone who can be trusted to contribute to the team's success—especially in big moments. This aspect of “winning” mentality is harder to quantify, but it seems to be a critical factor in choosing someone for leadership roles or high-pressure situations.

Should Winning Percentage Be a Factor?

To answer your question: Yes, winning percentage should absolutely be considered, but not in isolation. Winning percentage provides context for understanding how often a player’s team wins while they’re on the field, which is important in assessing their potential as part of a successful squad. However, delta adds another layer by showing how much a player is contributing to those wins (or losses).

What you’re really getting at, though, is the idea of “winning mentality” or the ability to contribute to team success beyond just statistics—something that winning percentage alone doesn't measure. You could have a high winning percentage due to being part of a successful team without necessarily being a "clutch" player or someone who can turn a game around when needed.

Applying This to Boyd, Metcalf, and TMM:

  • Boyd: While his delta is neutral, his low career win percentage indicates that, as you said, he has a history of not being a “winner” in the sense of influencing games and lifting the team when it matters. It’s possible that Boyd lacks the ability to change the outcome of games in a way that would elevate his team’s success in critical moments.
  • Metcalf: He’s the opposite. His high win percentage (especially in 2023) and positive delta show that he’s already proving to be an asset for his team and could grow into the type of player who has a significant impact on the outcome of games. He’s someone who can be relied on in tight moments, which makes him a true "winner" in this context.
  • TMM: His win percentage isn’t exceptional, but his positive delta in recent seasons indicates that he’s contributing to his team’s success. While not a game-changer in the Metcalf sense, TMM is a player who seems to be involved in teams that win, even if his individual performance isn’t always spectacular. He might be the kind of player who doesn't necessarily lift the team but ensures they don’t fall behind.

Conclusion:

Winning percentage should absolutely factor into the evaluation, as it gives context to a player's role in their team’s success. But delta is more valuable for understanding a player’s direct contribution to that success or failure. Ultimately, though, when evaluating "winners," it’s not just about stats—it's about a player’s ability to influence the outcome of a game, especially in critical moments. So while Boyd may have a neutral delta, his history of struggling to "win" might be more telling than the numbers suggest.

On the other hand, Metcalf’s ability to make a difference, even when the team is struggling, is an invaluable asset, and TMM’s consistency with his teams’ success—despite not always being the star—makes him a valuable cog in the wheel, as you put it. If we combine both metrics (winning percentage and delta) with a subjective assessment of a player’s impact on key moments, we get a much fuller picture of their value.

So, in short, both metrics are important, but winning percentage speaks more to a player’s general success, while delta highlights their specific contribution. The “mental side” of being a winner (i.e., clutch performance and leadership) is harder to quantify but just as critical when making long-term assessments.
 
Why in your opinion was 2024 such an outlier for Boyd compared with previous seasons?

Des changing the structure which didn’t suit Boyd?

Another point, for the sake of conversation, should winning percentage be a factor as well as delta? Ie for Boyd, despite my backing his delta stats, he still has a history of not knowing how to win which is a bigger issue for me. Metcalf and TMM are winners and are better ‘cogs in the wheel’, irrespective of how they personally contribute?
Wrighty's Hot take with regards to Delta vs Personal Winning Percentage.

I think from playing sports Delta is more important however if you have a very long history of having a personal low winning percentage and playing for teams that lose you will be behind on your development and low on confidence. So it depends how many year it has been going on for ...

In the case of CHT and Boyd it has been going on three to four years. Not long enough for it to be terminal and both are young in terms of the impact of being in a losing culture.

So my advice would be to take the player with a good delta. The choice put differently is would you take a strong player in a losing team or a weak player in a champion team? Before you think that is a captain obvious choice bear in mind that cricket and rugby selectors in age group quite often take players from the strong schools and our own Tobias Crosby was overlooked for the Wellington NPC team as he was a standout player but for the worst team in the division.
So do selectors know more than we know? And if so then you would rank TMM over Boyd as TMM comes from a winning culture.

Personally I am a Delta guy but havn't done as much selecting as a proper rugby union or cricket selector
 
NZWarriors.com
Advertisement
If you would like to remove these advertisements, please do so by registering a free account
The Titans were smashed with injuries to start the season - David Fifita and Jayden Campbell’s out then Tino Fa’asuamaleaui, ruptured his ACL.

After that 6 game horror start to the season (which could be attributed to injuries) he won 2/3 later in the season for 66% 😉
He didn't play in all six losses upon further review. But was about 0-4 at half back. Then Des Put Foran at 7 and Boyd at 6 and Titans started to get a mixture of wins and narrow losses.
Maybe Boyd plays better at 6?
 
NZWarriors.com
Advertisement
If you would like to remove these advertisements, please do so by registering a free account
So, in short, both metrics are important, but winning percentage speaks more to a player’s general success, while delta highlights their specific contribution.
So as an example:

You have a player that’s a 50% win player.

Playing for the Titans at 40% wins his delta is +10%

Same player playing for the Storm at 60% his delta is -10%.

Does win rate gives more context than the delta? A good player in a bad team will have an overblown Delta and a good player in a great team won’t shine on delta?
 
So as an example:

You have a player that’s a 50% win player.

Playing for the Titans at 40% wins his delta is +10%

Same player playing for the Storm at 60% his delta is -10%.

Does win rate gives more context than the delta? A good player in a bad team will have an overblown Delta and a good player in a great team won’t shine on delta?
We're getting sucked down into a rabbit hole of debating the esoterica of Wrighty's stats methodology. This is just a glimpse of what it's like inside his mind.
 
NZWarriors.com
Advertisement
If you would like to remove these advertisements, please do so by registering a free account
People need to learn that NRL games are not played on a blackboard.
Too many variables
The Warriors have 6 or 7 full time stats analysts to support Webster and the coaching staff. I know this as on a Warriors documentary Roger took the camera for a tour of Warriors head quarters and he said "and here are all the brains who do the numbers" and it showed 6 or 7 dudes doing things on a computer.
You just know Bellamy must be into stats.
 
So as an example:

You have a player that’s a 50% win player.

Playing for the Titans at 40% wins his delta is +10%

Same player playing for the Storm at 60% his delta is -10%.

Does win rate gives more context than the delta? A good player in a bad team will have an overblown Delta and a good player in a great team won’t shine on delta?
Let's put some fake names to this

Surprising Shaun at the Titans wins 50% of the time but the Titans only win 40% of the time
Team man Steve at the Storm wins 60^ of the time but the Storm win 70% of the time.

If Steve was actually good his Delta would be 0 or positive. The fact it is only 60% at the Storm means he is in the team as an up and coming player who they are investing in or a journeyman in the last year of his contract.
 
NZWarriors.com
Advertisement
If you would like to remove these advertisements, please do so by registering a free account
The Warriors have 6 or 7 full time stats analysts to support Webster and the coaching staff. I know this as on a Warriors documentary Roger took the camera for a tour of Warriors head quarters and he said "and here are all the brains who do the numbers" and it showed 6 or 7 dudes doing things on a computer.
You just know Bellamy must be into stats.
Just a quick point as a person who has played a lot of league at a relatively high level. I have never once heard a player talk about statistics.
Also any stats on Bellamy being into stats.
Stats in my opinion are a great conversation point but are not realistic.
Just my thoughts
 
Back
Top