Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why would Davidson get lippy to Agar? His press credentials are his livelihood
Because he was pissed? Someone said they got that impression from his movement? Interesting it hasn’t even made shows like nrl 360 which are usually pretty quick to dig a boot in where possibleUnless there is evidence that the Journo baited Agar, I think it's more likely that Agar said something to the journalist to kick off the minor episode.
Why would Davidson get lippy to Agar? His press credentials are his livelihood - seems unlikely he would jeopardise that to taunt Agar at a major NRL event. It's more likely Agar was still fucked off about the article.
Because he was pissed? Someone said they got that impression from his movement?
Interesting it hasn’t even made shows like nrl 360 which are usually pretty quick to dig a boot in where possible
Just think the club backing him and the available footage probably says he was legit in his account of the situation. Paul Kent giving a commentary is ironic considering his escapade last year, good to hear he’s not making something out of what sounds like there could be some blame on both sides thoughI love the narrative. Can't really determine that from the footage, he may just have done his ankle in or whatever.
I don't watch NRL360, but there's been a few other journos cover it (Kenty..etc) who reckon there's nothing in it.
Just think the club backing him and the available footage probably says he was legit in his account of the situation.
Paul Kent giving a commentary is ironic considering his escapade last year, good to hear he’s not making something out of what sounds like there could be some blame on both sides though
Pure speculation of intoxication on my partHis account is definitely more creditbale than the journos, now that the lie has been found. Personally, I think it's still a bit of a stretch to use the footage as evidence for intoxication. I see where you're coming from.
Yeah. Fully agree. It's just a bit difficult to find any Aussie journo talking about it.
Might see fans with “John’s a pussy” signs at Mt Smart![]()
And still get it wrongIf the NRL is investigating this incident via video , they’ll ask for 10 different camera angles
If it was the likes of the Roosters, Tigers or Eels they would be on it all week.Because he was pissed? Someone said they got that impression from his movement? Interesting it hasn’t even made shows like nrl 360 which are usually pretty quick to dig a boot in where possible
Unless there is evidence that the Journo baited Agar, I think it's more likely that Agar said something to the journalist to kick off the minor episode.
Why would Davidson get lippy to Agar? His press credentials are his livelihood - seems unlikely he would jeopardise that to taunt Agar at a major NRL event. It's more likely Agar was still fucked off about the article.
2nd poor decision from Agar. Should STFU and let it blow over.Stuff
www.stuff.co.nz
stuff continuing the story. Will be interesting to see if more comes out over time with CG saying there’s much more to the story
2nd poor decision from Agar. Should STFU and let it blow over.
Looks like footage from when they arrived back from Las Vegas, so just a delayed story from stuff more like. Slow news day. Hasn’t said anything since publicly that I’ve seen, but just interesting the comment from CG about much more to the story. Not sure if he’s alluding to the history between the two?2nd poor decision from Agar. Should STFU and let it blow over.