Pretty sound logic. I'd treat him that way too. It's nurturing your players. Agree with what you are saying.Thanks for that.
That clarifies it then, TMM is the no2 stand off and CHT is there or thereabouts for that fourteen job going up against Dylan Walker for that Role (all things being equal Walker was signed to play NRL so even if CHT becomes the Utility, Walker will still get picked every week).
I have been thinking about how they are managing CHT. If he is not selected, it may be purely a function of a return to NRL program designed not to repeat past mistakes where he lost his passion for play in favor of other interests.
I would imagine if the Warriors had done their homework when the resigned CHT, they would have asked what were the challenges for him last time, and what would help him to be on a different path this time.
Speculating here, but perhaps burn out came up, perhaps disappointment around the pressure he puts on himself, the pressure the game and the environment puts on a kid...that kinda thing.
Baring in mind he came into the NRL with commentators saying he was the most exciting junior prospect out of NZ, and then imagining how he felt as he had his struggles after that.
It would make sense for the Warriors to then come up with a plan along the lines of....you missed out on a lot an ideal development pathway last time, what if we strip it all back, start over, ease you back in, check in with you all the time, have built in breaks from play, give you time in the NSW cup to actually round out your game the way you want it etc etc.....
Might be just over thinking it, well I am not even saying I think this is the case, rather, it always strikes me that there is a lot more layers to what happens behind the scenes and in players minds, a well run club will put players development first, in the belief that in the longer term, that is putting the team first.