With our bye coming up, looks like a good time to reassess where we are. At the end of round 9 last year, we were in 3rd with p/d of 0:
View attachment 17199
This year, we are 2nd with p/d of 108. Our defence is as sturdy as it was last year (174 vs 170) but our attack is miles better: we've scored 100 pts more than we did this time last season (278 vs 174). Important to note that we are the only team in both top 4s: the other top 4 teams from last year are now outside the 8 (Dogs, Melbourne and Canberra).
View attachment 17200
I guess one can also view these results in the prism of the team under Mets vs team under Boyd. Clearly both are top 4 teams, but under our current configuration, we are just a much more deadly and organized attacking unit.
There is no question that
Boyd and
CHT in combination unlock our attack.
And you don't have to make it complicated to understand why.
Boyd anchors the attack. It is that simple. Which has multiple flow on effects that unlock possibilities for other players.
So we have a sample of
Webster ball being played out by a sideways running eyes up footy half, vs a direct running half (I would argue
Tanah is known for being a conventional organizer rather than instinctual half - but this season he has showed he has another dimension to his play - high engagement in eye's up reactive footy which has elevated his game out of sight).
If I am right, if the change engine in
Boyd is adding reactive game reading to his bow, then he is building into the perfect rugby league no 7 type, the guy with a full box of tools.
He is still quite young, so it really shouldn't come as a surprise that he is actually evolving as a player (rather than some mystical transformation thanks to other players around him or for that matter the fan tendency to say nah
Boyd sucks this is temporary).
Boyd's direct game means other players like
CHT have more space, more options. Did anyone notice
Boyd running at the line trying to split defenders for no other reason than an extra meter and or a faster ptb Saturday night?
Those little runs are like jab in the face eh...they keep the opposition guessing what he is gonna do. And the other thing is
Boyd was doing it on tackle 5 (which really messes with the defence) and also speaks to
Boyd being able to trust
Chanel to get the kick away (Chanels field kicking is improving as a result).
The Warriors local players have some fundamental flaws (not their fault the coaching and lack of high performance in kids league is terrible). We are poor passers of the ball (insufferable attack killer) and our timing and shapes are off (coaching, coaching, coaching). So having a running drifting Benji Marshall,
SJ (the younger) type half makes ball movement even more difficult (we are also behind the eight ball with catching the ball).
In such environments it is essential to have a crisp, clean, predictable ball arch across the field which starts at hooker - halfback - Standoff etc.
Once the backs are catching the ball ok, they find passing it easier.....hey....look....Warriors attack is being unlocked.
Once that is going on.....
Andrew Webster tells his forwards, hey guys we are ready for the return of the short inter passing game....you earned it, you are maintaining our number 1# KPI (possession) move that ball....2026 is GO TIME.
And the last element, is we are defending our mistakes, meaning
Webster allows them to keep moving the ball and trying it on....did I say last element?
I lied.
Adding speed with AKP is the last element, along with (more lying) sticking with young explosive attacking backrowers, meaning that the defence has too many people of concern to watch....but all of that means nothing if the ball ain't the real threat, and
Tanah Boyd is the ball master.