Is success linked to player catchment?
Going off gut instinct, the Storm, Roosters, Raiders, Knights and Cowboys would all have below average playing numbers to draw from but do well or have for periods.
The Eels, Warriors, Titans, Tigers, etc have a larger catchment but have struggled.
Seems more the culture in the club where a team develops x-factor that can attract or allow them to buy players on the cheap.
I refer to viability, adding to the list of pros and cons in regards to player catchment.
Roosters and Storm sure. We all know why the Roosters keep getting players. Raiders have had to resort to English players to be competitive recently. Knights are a few hours away from Sydney. Not a 5 hour flight.
Cowboys? Wouldn’t have a clue tbh. But that’s kinda adding to my point. We can’t have to many teams like that.
When I was referring to “on field” success, I was pretty much dismissing it in regards to the Melbourne Storm, that despite their success. They were losing money for years and have no grassroots.
IMO they’ve been “helped” along the way. Where would the Melbourne Storm be if they weren’t so successful? Gone…….
On field success is a funny one. Obviously it’s important, obviously it’s what we strive for. But when it comes to the big decisions; expansion, direction…….. it’s kinda irrelevant.
It keeps you “off the chopping block”, it doesn’t mean you get to pick who’s on it.
And I point to……..
The Warriors, they aren’t successful. But the NRL would NEVER even consider cutting them. If they did? You can rip that Sky TV deal up, directly losing millions of dollars. And interest in the NRL would plummet reducing the potential player pool. Other than the Brisbane Broncos, you could argue the Warriors are the most important club in the NRL.
Yeah “on field success” is cool. But from the NRL’s perspective, it’s irrelevant. “Someone” will win every year. lol
Personally I find it strange how everyone can see what Melbourne does and it’s explained away by saying “they know the ref can’t keep blowing his whistle” or something similar…… bullshit.
Ah, so they do just get away with it……..
The Warriors sure as hell wouldn’t get away with it.
And it’s the “on field success” that I’m most concerned about with that Perth team. Not as a hater, but because of the potential “help” the NRL could give them. The NRL would be desperate, absolutely desperate to keep the Perth club going.
There really is no upside to the Perth team.
1. No extra money, (unless the WA government gets involved? Idk)
2. No player pool (no real one)
3. Extra travel, Christchurch is closer to the Australian east coast.
4. Extra pressure on existing player pool.
5. Pressure on the NRL to keep them relevant.
I don’t see much upside.