Social Introducing NZW Ultimate Team

Is it possible to nominate who interchanges for who pre game? Wasn’t impressed to see the Black Pearl subbed off. He needs to earn his wage & play the full 80!!
yeah i need to rework the interchange a bit. there were some strange interchanges this round so some bug must have crept in.

But if he was replaced, that notionally means a better player (even if it was a positional change for the substituting player x fatigue) had become available/could provide better impact at that point in time. i need to rethink this a bit more and see all the outcomes from round 1 first though to see if there are some overrides happening.
 
Great half time commentary advice:

‘Both teams completing at an elite level — excellent discipline from both sides.
It's been error-riddled — 10 errors between the two sides. The team that cleans up first will take control.’

🤣
 
Great half time commentary advice:

‘Both teams completing at an elite level — excellent discipline from both sides.
It's been error-riddled — 10 errors between the two sides. The team that cleans up first will take control.’

🤣
lol to be fair there is game context aware built into the commentary but might be looking at penalties etc for "discipline" rather than including errors. Ill put it on the list to check
 
lol to be fair there is game context aware built into the commentary but might be looking at penalties etc for "discipline" rather than including errors. Ill put it on the list to check
Is every sin bin an automatic judiciary?

Poor Knights have 3 sent off and sitting out next week! Who’s the lucky team playing them next week?

Wow… it’s me!

Their coach needs to work on their discipline!
 
Is every sin bin an automatic judiciary?

Poor Knights have 3 sent off and sitting out next week! Who’s the lucky team playing them next week?

Wow… it’s me!

Their coach needs to work on their discipline!
Cant rem lol...but some charges are contestable and some arent.

I saw that w knights. Suspect they have low leadership attributes across the park. I need to check that too. Poor Ali seemed to have paid the price for repeated warnings and being the next to offend.
 
Cant rem lol...but some charges are contestable and some arent.

I saw that w knights. Suspect they have low leadership attributes across the park. I need to check that too. Poor Ali seemed to have paid the price for repeated warnings and being the next to offend.
Those bins were fair enough. They were infringing everywhere and the ref couldn't just keep warning them. Coach has some work to do in that franchise
 
Is everyone OK with the following implementation for bench strategy?

Screenshot 2026-03-26 at 10.36.57 am.webp

This way you are able to control managed substitutions and who they replace and how much gametime the bench players get, and also control which players do not get substituted. There may be slight variances to this depending on HIA, injuries etc though which are uncontrollable.

Is it pretty self explanatory?
 
BTW if anyone is interested in understanding why certain things happened, the way they did in the match let me know. I can try to explain.

For example the Knights 3 sinbins....

1. Min 2 — Reece Walsh (Fullback): Foul play. Very early sin bin at 0-0. His tackling rating is just 39 — low-discipline defenders are more likely to commit foul play. Returned at min 12.
2. Min 54 — Bunty Afoa (Prop): Foul play at 12-16. This came right after Karl Lawton was penalised twice in quick succession (min 51 and 54). The penalty pressure was building — Afoa copped the bin. Returned at min 64.
3. Min 73 — Ali Lauiti'iti (Second-row): Repeated penalties. This is the automatic one — Ali had already been penalised at min 26, 38, and 73. Three personal penalties triggered the "repeated infringements" sin bin. He was also fatigued (0.62) which increases error/penalty rates.

Knights conceded 12 penalties to 3. Why?
1) Knights: aggressive defence = higher penalty rate
2) Hammerheads: standard defence = standard penalty rate

Aggressive defence is high-risk — you rush up, you pressure, but more likely to away penalties. The Knights got punished hard for that choice, especially in the second half when fatigue compounded it (12 of their penalties came in the second half).
 
BTW if anyone is interested in understanding why certain things happened, the way they did in the match let me know. I can try to explain.

For example the Knights 3 sinbins....

1. Min 2 — Reece Walsh (Fullback): Foul play. Very early sin bin at 0-0. His tackling rating is just 39 — low-discipline defenders are more likely to commit foul play. Returned at min 12.
2. Min 54 — Bunty Afoa (Prop): Foul play at 12-16. This came right after Karl Lawton was penalised twice in quick succession (min 51 and 54). The penalty pressure was building — Afoa copped the bin. Returned at min 64.
3. Min 73 — Ali Lauiti'iti (Second-row): Repeated penalties. This is the automatic one — Ali had already been penalised at min 26, 38, and 73. Three personal penalties triggered the "repeated infringements" sin bin. He was also fatigued (0.62) which increases error/penalty rates.

Knights conceded 12 penalties to 3. Why?
1) Knights: aggressive defence = higher penalty rate
2) Hammerheads: standard defence = standard penalty rate

Aggressive defence is high-risk — you rush up, you pressure, but more likely to away penalties. The Knights got punished hard for that choice, especially in the second half when fatigue compounded it (12 of their penalties came in the second half).
So if you give away repeated penalties you get sent to the judiciary and suspended for a week+ every time or is that random?

Aggressive defence resulting in a sin bin is acceptable but suspensions as well?
 
So if you give away repeated penalties you get sent to the judiciary and suspended for a week+ every time or is that random?

Aggressive defence resulting in a sin bin is acceptable but suspensions as well?
Good point. Knights should thank you. I will fix that manually. Ali will be free to play and his 4 game suspension wiped out. The other two are valid though.
 
Back
Top Bottom