Nah, just dealing with conspiracy and far right wankers as usual
Politics π€‘ Donald Trump
- Thread starter sup42
- Start date
Systematic is a strong word here. It was an observed practice.
See the work of William Rubinstein.
There contemporary reports as well
trove.nla.gov.au
trove.nla.gov.au
ABORIGINAL CANNIBALISM. - The Australasian (Melbourne, Vic. : 1864 - 1946) - 6 Aug 1921
The question whether cannibalism was brought into Australia by the circumcised hordes which formed the second migration, or whether it was practised by the ...
trove.nla.gov.au
ABORIGINAL WOMEN - (Concluded) - Northern Standard (Darwin, NT : 1921 - 1955) - 4 Jul 1939
Infanticide is undoubtedly practised, according to Spencer and Gillen, but, except on rare occasions, the child killed when born, and then ...
trove.nla.gov.au
Well, first, you deleted the previous link, good idea, it looked dodgy as fuck.There contemporary reports as well
ABORIGINAL CANNIBALISM. - The Australasian (Melbourne, Vic. : 1864 - 1946) - 6 Aug 1921
The question whether cannibalism was brought into Australia by the circumcised hordes which formed the second migration, or whether it was practised by the ...
ABORIGINAL WOMEN - (Concluded) - Northern Standard (Darwin, NT : 1921 - 1955) - 4 Jul 1939
Infanticide is undoubtedly practised, according to Spencer and Gillen, but, except on rare occasions, the child killed when born, and then ...
And are you seriously pulling two frankly unverifiable newspaper archives, one from an alias?
Desperate and hilarious.
Aboriginal infanticide is no different to mΔori cannibalism and the Moriori. Itβs all a white man myth to make the brown man look bad.
Until itβs proven as fact.
Until itβs proven as fact.
juju
π₯
The guy who was wanking on about starting a business that would benefit indigenous people - wanking on about Aboriginals eating foetuses.
Should be a great business that will go really well.
Wait, Iβm meant to pretend that they didnβt? I guess you pretend your kids arenβt getting bashed. Not my style though
I had a look at those sources and from what I can see, the Thomas paper records and interprets alleged infanticide from settler observations rather than something widespread and normal in aboriginal culture.There contemporary reports as well
ABORIGINAL CANNIBALISM. - The Australasian (Melbourne, Vic. : 1864 - 1946) - 6 Aug 1921
The question whether cannibalism was brought into Australia by the circumcised hordes which formed the second migration, or whether it was practised by the ...
ABORIGINAL WOMEN - (Concluded) - Northern Standard (Darwin, NT : 1921 - 1955) - 4 Jul 1939
Infanticide is undoubtedly practised, according to Spencer and Gillen, but, except on rare occasions, the child killed when born, and then ...
The 19th century newspaper reports, while valuable, also reflect how events were reported. These reports are often second hand and written when there was a strong bias and benefit from making aboriginals out to be much worse than they were.
I can see isolated incidents, but that's different from (seemingly) claiming aboriginals were eating fetuses routinely or was a norm. If there's something more modern and peer reviewed, I'd genuinely be interested in seeing it.
Well, you're not even close to the second sentence, or the first.
You really need help Frank.
Those aren't myths at all, it's widely known to be true. The myths are that the Moriori are extinct, or that it was more than two iwi that slaughtered the Moriori.
juju
π₯
Oh you'll be pretending when you're running your business (if that's not make believe which I suspect.)
Bit easier to be a nut case anonymously on a Warriors forum of all places.
I grew up in the 90s NZ. Both of those things were routinely referred to as βmythsβ.
Iβm sure Naarm University will be thrilled to publish a study called βInfanticide amongst Aboriginal Australiansβ
I really canβt see any issues at all with that
Lucky that was 30 years ago.
The issue isnβt whether a university would publish it, itβs whether the evidence supports the scale of the claim being made.Iβm sure Naarm University will be thrilled to publish a study called βInfanticide amongst Aboriginal Australiansβ
I really canβt see any issues at all with that
Allegations recorded in 1840s newspapers arenβt automatically proof of a general cultural practice.
100% I agree. But you wouldnβt be allowed near records to even study it. Theres 100s of references to it in contemporary writing of the period. Not that that is conclusively proof of anything.
Youβre talking about the country that finds the oldest humans remains ever and buries them without study. We only just admitted Tasmanian aboriginals werent extinct. We havenβt even started the Denisovan conversation yet.
What's the implication of Denisovan DNA?
How does Denisovan DNA enter the genetic record of a peopleβs that claim 65,000 years of continuous culture?
Came down from SE Asia and entered the gene pool at some early stage?