Politics 🤡 Donald Trump

Highlights Only (4)
j_p said:

View: https://youtu.be/o8q0ax84qio?si=M_jDTIgxVzzo6YY3

This is the only response I see to the latest killing from the right lately. Why was he bringing a loaded gun to a peaceful protest...
Click to expand...

They’ve dug up footage from about 11 days prior to Alex Pretti being shot that he was in a situation with ice agents where he spat on some and kicked a taillight of one of their vehicles in. Even trump has put one of his pathetic messages out just thinly veiled at him being a bad person and his murder somehow justified. The difference is here that there’s no way of trying to pave a scenario like Renee Good’s tires were heading towards him and he had to think quick or some bullshit like that because the footage plainly shows Pretti stripped of his weapon and shot in the back. The excessive 10 shots gives the impression of a personal grievance like Renee Good called a fucken bitch when shot as footage shows from that shooting
 
  • Like
Reactions: j_p
Noitall said:
They’ve dug up footage from about 11 days prior to Alex Pretti being shot that he was in a situation with ice agents where he spat on some and kicked a taillight of one of their vehicles in. Even trump has put one of his pathetic messages out just thinly veiled at him being a bad person and his murder somehow justified. The difference is here that there’s no way of trying to pave a scenario like Renee Good’s tires were heading towards him and he had to think quick or some bullshit like that because the footage plainly shows Pretti stripped of his weapon and shot in the back. The excessive 10 shots gives the impression of a personal grievance like Renee Good called a fucken bitch when shot as footage shows from that shooting
Click to expand...
and juxtapose that with how Kyle Rittenhouse is treated to this day.

America is messed up.
 
wizard of Tauranga said:
Terrible stuff.

This should either be being investigated by law enforcement with charges pending or withdrawn as lacking credibility.

There’s not really an in between.
Click to expand...
Isn’t the person lacking credibility the one or people suppressing them and blacking out parts? In a country where lawsuits are so easily brought about, and now trump suing American treasury, you’d wonder why no lawsuits have been brought to those making the allegations?
 
Noitall said:
Isn’t the person lacking credibility the one or people suppressing them and blacking out parts? In a country where lawsuits are so easily brought about, and now trump suing American treasury, you’d wonder why no lawsuits have been brought to those making the allegations?
Click to expand...
To be fair, the Epstein files are a collection of law enforcement notes from unnamed sources.

There’s nothing to judge the credibility or context of what’s in them.

That’s jail material if true and pretty slanderous if false.

Without any context it’s a bit irresponsible and defamatory putting it in the public, which is probably why it’s been withdrawn:

As I said, based on that charge him. Otherwise it can’t be credible. There’s no in between.
 
wizard of Tauranga said:
To be fair, the Epstein files are a collection of law enforcement notes from unnamed sources.

There’s nothing to judge the credibility or context of what’s in them.

That’s jail material if true and pretty slanderous if false.

Without any context it’s a bit irresponsible and defamatory putting it in the public, which is probably why it’s been withdrawn:

As I said, based on that charge him. Otherwise it can’t be credible. There’s no in between.
Click to expand...
So why isn't Trump suing when he's very quick to bring lawsuits to anyone he things he can legally shut up.
 
wizard of Tauranga said:
To be fair, the Epstein files are a collection of law enforcement notes from unnamed sources.

There’s nothing to judge the credibility or context of what’s in them.

That’s jail material if true and pretty slanderous if false.

Without any context it’s a bit irresponsible and defamatory putting it in the public, which is probably why it’s been withdrawn:

As I said, based on that charge him. Otherwise it can’t be credible. There’s no in between.
Click to expand...
No there’s sources to be fair, go look up Sasha Riley among the others that have put their names to this and becoming more and more credible as they try to piece things together. There’s no doubt epstein ran what’s alleged, but whether trump was involved is the matter and The point of the matter is he ran an election on saying he would release them, that’s by his doing. Charge him how when redactions are being made? Everyone who’s name is on this list like Clinton and Gates now outed won’t cooperate when the main person in them isn’t cooperating and being so obvious in how they are trying to avoid connection
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom