Politics 🤡 Donald Trump

Highlights Only (4)
Noitall said:
No there’s sources to be fair, go look up Sasha Riley among the others that have put their names to this and becoming more and more credible as they try to piece things together. There’s no doubt epstein ran what’s alleged, but whether trump was involved is the matter and The point of the matter is he ran an election on saying he would release them, that’s by his doing. Charge him how when redactions are being made? Everyone who’s name is on this list like Clinton and Gates now outed won’t cooperate when the main person in them isn’t cooperating and being so obvious in how they are trying to avoid connection
Click to expand...
These are rich, powerful people but if victims are making these statements, the police have to act.

Doesn’t matter if Trump, etc won’t cooperate, when do perpetrators ever cooperate? Police build a case and press charges.

HOWEVER if the statements are not credible, they shouldn’t be out in public with no way to defend yourself. If it was you and people were making half baked statements to the police about you and then police released them to the public with no credibility it would be defamation wouldn’t it?

Honestly if Trump was involved in what that statement says, he’s crazy to campaign on releasing the Epstein files. But stranger things have happed with Trump!
 
wizard of Tauranga said:
These are rich, powerful people but if victims are making these statements, the police have to act.

Doesn’t matter if Trump, etc won’t cooperate, when do perpetrators ever cooperate? Police build a case and press charges.

HOWEVER if the statements are not credible, they shouldn’t be out in public with no way to defend yourself. If it was you and people were making half baked statements to the police about you and then police released them to the public with no credibility it would be defamation wouldn’t it?

Honestly if Trump was involved in what that statement says, he’s crazy to campaign on releasing the Epstein files. But stranger things have happed with Trump!
Click to expand...
You do realise it's now an authoritarian regime who are basically making laws up now?
 
wizard of Tauranga said:
These are rich, powerful people but if victims are making these statements, the police have to act.

Doesn’t matter if Trump, etc won’t cooperate, when do perpetrators ever cooperate? Police build a case and press charges.

HOWEVER if the statements are not credible, they shouldn’t be out in public with no way to defend yourself. If it was you and people were making half baked statements to the police about you and then police released them to the public with no credibility it would be defamation wouldn’t it?

Honestly if Trump was involved in what that statement says, he’s crazy to campaign on releasing the Epstein files. But stranger things have happed with Trump!
Click to expand...
Police have to act but not everyone is getting the opportunity to the same treatment as trump because of his platform no matter how rich and powerful because of his ability to have these parts blacked out. No one should be above others and there’s parts of their constitution that were meant to cover this happening that aren’t being followed
 
Noitall said:
Police have to act but not everyone is getting the opportunity to the same treatment as trump because of his platform no matter how rich and powerful because of his ability to have these parts blacked out. No one should be above others and there’s parts of their constitution that were meant to cover this happening that aren’t being followed
Click to expand...
The underage victims were blacked out to protect innocent people from public scrutiny.

If the statements are unverified then does that make those who the allegations about, a potential victim, entitled to the same right to protection?

If they are true then the police have to prosecute.

MaybeTop8 said:
You do realise it's now an authoritarian regime who are basically making laws up now?
Click to expand...
This is a real concern? Are they to powerful to prosecute? I don’t believe (or at least hope) the judiciary system is corrupted.

Although the pursuit of politically motivated hit jobs (the 4 cases prior to the election) probably did a lot of damage and undermined future prosecution attempts.

Unfortunately there’s so much crying wolf over Trump (including on here) that it weakens the stuff that should be big issues.

This is sickening if true and a resignation type issue but could get lost in the endless ranting about anything and everything Trump. Trump has Gish Galloped you all.
 
wizard of Tauranga said:
The underage victims were blacked out to protect innocent people from public scrutiny.

If the statements are unverified then does that make those who the allegations about, a potential victim, entitled to the same right to protection?

If they are true then the police have to prosecute
Click to expand...
Some of those that were underaged are public knowledge so they’re not protecting anyone but trump. Any other reason than that is bullshit
 
wizard of Tauranga said:
The underage victims were blacked out to protect innocent people from public scrutiny.

If the statements are unverified then does that make those who the allegations about, a potential victim, entitled to the same right to protection?

If they are true then the police have to prosecute.


This is a real concern? Are they to powerful to prosecute? I don’t believe (or at least hope) the judiciary system is corrupted.

Although the pursuit of politically motivated hit jobs (the 4 cases prior to the election) probably did a lot of damage and undermined future prosecution attempts.

Unfortunately there’s so much crying wolf over Trump (including on here) that it weakens the stuff that should be big issues.

This is sickening if true and a resignation type issue but could get lost in the endless ranting about anything and everything Trump. Trump has Gish Galloped you all.
Click to expand...
There's no crying wolf, only you refusing to believe and seeking to minimize and deflect. Again.

That's who you are
 
Tokyo Warrior said:
Musk is openly on drugs. Rubio and Don Jr appear off their face on coke regularly. Matt Gaetz and Ronny Jackson. Reports of speed being handed out. Law enforcement dgaf. It’s a special club and you and I aren’t in it.
Click to expand...
The attorney general or special counsel prosecutes high profile people for the department of justice.

Who are these people and who appointed them? Hopefully they are former judges of high integrity?

The president can’t actually be prosecuted while in office but can be impeached and impeachment for this would be resignation material.
 
wizard of Tauranga said:
The attorney general or special counsel prosecutes high profile people for the department of justice.

Who are these people and who appointed them? Hopefully they are former judges of high integrity?

The president can’t actually be prosecuted while in office but can be impeached and impeachment for this would be resignation material.
Click to expand...
Start educating yourself on what is happening in the US Wiz and if you did you would be embarrassed by how half baked some of your comments are.

A good place to start might be having a look on YouTube at some of the Congressional hearings and you will soon see how members of Trumps cabinet do not give a flying fuck about the law or the Constitution
 
Hardyman's Yugo said:
View attachment 15607
Who knows the truth of all this Epstein stuff, but there appears to be a hell of a lot mentioning Trump and most people will make their own judgement of him
Click to expand...
I think a reasonable standard for most people is that if a man is accused by multiple different individuals of rape and molestation that he is a sex offender.
Trump of course has had this fact embossed in a court of law.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom