Politics 🤡 Donald Trump

🤖 AI Summary

📝 Summary:

The forum thread extensively discusses Donald Trump's legal battles and his 2024 presidential campaign, centering on fraud convictions, election eligibility disputes, and broader political implications. A central focus is the New York fraud case where Trump was fined over $350 million and barred from business roles, as outlined in #358, alongside ongoing debates about his appeal strategies. Eligibility challenges under the 14th Amendment are debated, particularly rulings in Colorado and Maine blocking him from primary ballots due to alleged insurrection ties, emphasized in #260#301. Participants analyze the fairness of these legal actions, with user #393 arguing that Trump faces numerous accusations but lacks criminal convictions, while others cite his civil liabilities. Nikki Haley's primary win in Washington D.C. is noted in #387, highlighting intra-party dynamics. The thread also explores broader concerns, including geopolitical risks under a potential Trump presidency and critiques of Republican policies, referencing abortion access impacts in #385. Throughout, there is polarization over Trump's guilt, political viability, and the implications for democracy.

🏷️ Tags:

Trump's Legal Challenges, 2024 Election Campaign, Insurrection Allegations

📊 Data Source: Based on ALL posts in thread (total: 4628 posts) | ⏱️ Total Generation Time: 27s
You don't have permission to regenerate AI summary.
If it’s integral research, why isn’t it funded properly? If it’s not integral, why are we doing it?

If it’s new paediatric leukaemia treatments, then it would be good if that wasn’t subject to cuts. If it’s intersectionality of marginalised groups with a focus on climate justice….
It seems like America used soft power to make the world reliant on it.

It’s good this ‘Buying’ friends is being addressed but does it push countries into the hands of the likes of China longer term?

What I find ironic is some of the institutes funded are very anti America, American ideals and the American way of life, yet were happy to take their money.
 

NZWarriors.com

What I find ironic is some of the institutes funded are very anti America, American ideals and the American way of life, yet were happy to take their money.
Did some more digging and this seems to be the gist. If you want to get American funding, you have to align with the “new” US values.

Hardly unreasonable
 
Did some more digging and this seems to be the gist. If you want to get American funding, you have to align with the “new” US values.

Hardly unreasonable
Classic Fascist playbook.

Science is A political, and then along come people who politicize it. In of itself it is A political.

We saw this time and again with the Pandemic. Pandemic science has zero to do with peoples opinions and or their political leanings.

One can almost guarantee that a number of these cancelled grants will be in the vaccine development sphere, Australia and New Zealand were at the forefront of some cutting edge research in the field of Vaccines.

Oh well we can look forward to the research into injecting bleach and sticking sunlight up your bunghole.
 
But they weren’t actual plans though was it? Military plans for actual operations contain maps, OPORDS, DEPORDS, and a whole bunch of stuff.

Saying we are going to bomb these guys isn’t a military plan.
 
But they weren’t actual plans though was it? Military plans for actual operations contain maps, OPORDS, DEPORDS, and a whole bunch of stuff.

Saying we are going to bomb these guys isn’t a military plan.
Suggest you read what was posted on the app. The journalist involved has published the full version. Rubio has already broken rank with the bellends in Trumps cabinet by stating it was a big mistake
 
Suggest you read what was posted on the app. The journalist involved has published the full version. Rubio has already broken rank with the bellends in Trumps cabinet by stating it was a big mistake
None of that changes what I said. Saying an F18 strike window is happening at 1315 isn’t a military plan. It’s breaking OPSEC though.

As for the who and why I didn’t comment on that.
 

Seems like more identity politics and political character assassination. Blaming Elon as the individual for South Africas past is a low IQ argument.

It’s quite laughable, he publicly supported Kanye Wests president bid (black guy), but now he supports Trump he is a white supremisist? Okayyyy….

Stop listening to ‘experts’ look at what the guy has actually said and done and make this make sense? 🤣
 
Back
Top Bottom