What I don't understand is if Trump is in the files, why didn't the Dems release them in the long periods they were in charge? Surely if there was anything damning against him they would have?
Politics 🤡 Donald Trump
- Thread starter sup42
- Start Date
NZWarriors.com
Because Clinton and many other Dems were recorded fucking underage kids too I assume. Trump was a Democrat then too.
You’d have to be very careful with trump to be on top of all legalities because of his tendency to sue. Very effective way to make people consider what they say
NZWarriors.com
Yeah sure, I get that there’s a chance he kicks up a stink & attempts to change the constitution. But the chances of the US becoming a dictatorship… incredibly remote despite a couple of voices on here suggesting it’s inevitable. There’s a couple of crazies contributing to this thread that need to be ignored.
That's no way to talk about MaybeTop8, I mean BussyBoy8 or whatever his new name's going to be. You wouldn't go that low though ...would you?
After the insurrection of capital hill he never told his followers to cease of January 6 and his unwillingness to concede losing that election to this day, it seems extremely naive to not consider there’s a good chance of an attempt again. Some even pardoned in what was an attack on what he’s supposed to represent. Not feeling the nothing to see here sentiment that others seem to share
NZWarriors.com
Top8’s great, & that name is an epic suggestion!
Yeah but acting like a poor loser is very different from constitutional change.
So if trump tries to get a third term but is unsuccessful who wins?
If he actually has to succeed in being president after the end of his second term then I agree, highly unlikely.
If he only has to clearly attempt to remain in power then that's not such a stretch to believe. But who wins in that case, coz he tried? And who decides how hard he has to try before we name a winner.
There is a lot more grey than black and white here. Maybe the forum gives them both new names unless they 100% agree who won and who lost? Then we all win, except George and Mildred, or whatever their new names are.
If he actually has to succeed in being president after the end of his second term then I agree, highly unlikely.
If he only has to clearly attempt to remain in power then that's not such a stretch to believe. But who wins in that case, coz he tried? And who decides how hard he has to try before we name a winner.
There is a lot more grey than black and white here. Maybe the forum gives them both new names unless they 100% agree who won and who lost? Then we all win, except George and Mildred, or whatever their new names are.
NZWarriors.com
He'll have to flee the country if Winston reads this forum
But it isn’t just acting like poor loser when the capital hill building is stormed and it’s not condemned, but petrol is poured on the fire that’s occurring
Yeah there's standards here
NZWarriors.com
if trump tries definitely a win for meNot between his two terms he wasn't. And surely Kamala and Biden would use it if it was there to stop his second term once and for all.
Either he isn't in there and/or many Democrats are implicated in there.
So then you would have to assume that he isn't in them or if he is that it is nothing actionable. Or that the Dems are so implicated in them as well that they couldn't do anything politically with it.
NZWarriors.com
FBI DIRECTOR KASH PATEL CONFIRMS THE FACTS - Nancy Pelosi involved in setting up Jan 6th - She made sure there were no National Guards on scene - Nancy and were team were busy filming a movie about Jan 6 (she later sold to HBO) - There were 250+ FB
FBI DIRECTOR KASH PATEL CONFIRMS THE FACTS - Nancy Pelosi involved in setting up Jan 6th - She made sure there were no National Guards on scene - Nancy and were team were busy filming a movie about...
www.facebook.com
The Epstein victims who spoke at the capital a couple weeks ago said there are tapes of Trump abusing kids, many dems are implicated, Clinton was a frequent flier to blackmail Island, both political parties are heavily compromised.
By the same token, why not just release them when he’s told his followers he would if he’s not implicated in any way? I’ve got no doubt that someone like Bill Clinton is potentially implicated but I wouldn’t assume anything, easiest way to shut it down is just release them
NZWarriors.com
Don't think they can because the tapes involve victims, "many of whom are a little on the young side".
FBI DIRECTOR KASH PATEL CONFIRMS THE FACTS - Nancy Pelosi involved in setting up Jan 6th - She made sure there were no National Guards on scene - Nancy and were team were busy filming a movie about Jan 6 (she later sold to HBO) - There were 250+ FB
FBI DIRECTOR KASH PATEL CONFIRMS THE FACTS - Nancy Pelosi involved in setting up Jan 6th - She made sure there were no National Guards on scene - Nancy and were team were busy filming a movie about...
Capitol riots: Did Trump's words at rally incite violence?
Donald Trump was accused of inciting violence that left five people dead. So what did the president say?
www.bbc.com
He said: "We're going to walk down to the Capitol and we're going to cheer on our brave senators and congressmen and women, and we're probably not going to be cheering so much for some of them