What I don't understand is if Trump is in the files, why didn't the Dems release them in the long periods they were in charge? Surely if there was anything damning against him they would have?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What I don't understand is if Trump is in the files, why didn't the Dems release them in the long periods they were in charge? Surely if there was anything damning against him they would have?
Because Clinton and many other Dems were recorded fucking underage kids too I assume. Trump was a Democrat then too.What I don't understand is if Trump is in the files, why didn't the Dems release them in the long periods they were in charge? Surely if there was anything damning against him they would have?
You’d have to be very careful with trump to be on top of all legalities because of his tendency to sue. Very effective way to make people consider what they sayWhat I don't understand is if Trump is in the files, why didn't the Dems release them in the long periods they were in charge? Surely if there was anything damning against him they would have?
Yeah sure, I get that there’s a chance he kicks up a stink & attempts to change the constitution. But the chances of the US becoming a dictatorship… incredibly remote despite a couple of voices on here suggesting it’s inevitable. There’s a couple of crazies contributing to this thread that need to be ignored.
The thought certainly doesn’t come out of thin air though when trump allies like this have openly said they are working on his re election for a third term. Interesting exchange here because if he gets a third term, it seems unlikely it will be through an election under how their constitution is formed
That's no way to talk about MaybeTop8, I mean BussyBoy8 or whatever his new name's going to be. You wouldn't go that low though ...would you?There’s a couple of crazies contributing to this thread that need to be ignored.
After the insurrection of capital hill he never told his followers to cease of January 6 and his unwillingness to concede losing that election to this day, it seems extremely naive to not consider there’s a good chance of an attempt again. Some even pardoned in what was an attack on what he’s supposed to represent. Not feeling the nothing to see here sentiment that others seem to shareYeah sure, I get that there’s a chance he kicks up a stink & attempts to change the constitution. But the chances of the US becoming a dictatorship… incredibly remote despite a couple of voices on here suggesting it’s inevitable. There’s a couple of crazies contributing to this thread that need to be ignored.
Top8’s great, & that name is an epic suggestion!That's no way to talk about MaybeTop8, I mean BussyBoy8 or whatever his new name's going to be. You wouldn't go that low though ...would you?
Yeah but acting like a poor loser is very different from constitutional change.After the insurrection of capital hill he never told his followers to cease of January 6 and his unwillingness to concede losing that election to this day, it seems extremely naive to not consider there’s a good chance of an attempt again. Some even pardoned in what was an attack on what he’s supposed to represent. Not feeling the nothing to see here sentiment that others seem to share
He'll have to flee the country if Winston reads this forumTop8’s great, & that name is an epic suggestion!
But it isn’t just acting like poor loser when the capital hill building is stormed and it’s not condemned, but petrol is poured on the fire that’s occurringYeah but acting like a poor loser is very different from constitutional change.
Yeah there's standards hereThat's no way to talk about MaybeTop8, I mean BussyBoy8 or whatever his new name's going to be. You wouldn't go that low though ...would you?
So if trump tries to get a third term but is unsuccessful who wins?
If he actually has to succeed in being president after the end of his second term then I agree, highly unlikely.
If he only has to clearly attempt to remain in power then that's not such a stretch to believe. But who wins in that case, coz he tried? And who decides how hard he has to try before we name a winner.
There is a lot more grey than black and white here. Maybe the forum gives them both new names unless they 100% agree who won and who lost? Then we all win, except George and Mildred, or whatever their new names are.
Not between his two terms he wasn't. And surely Kamala and Biden would use it if it was there to stop his second term once and for all.Because Clinton and many other Dems were recorded fucking underage kids too I assume. Trump was a Democrat then too.
So then you would have to assume that he isn't in them or if he is that it is nothing actionable. Or that the Dems are so implicated in them as well that they couldn't do anything politically with it.You’d have to be very careful with trump to be on top of all legalities because of his tendency to sue. Very effective way to make people consider what they say
But it isn’t just acting like poor loser when the capital hill building is stormed and it’s not condemned, but petrol is poured on the fire that’s occurring
The Epstein victims who spoke at the capital a couple weeks ago said there are tapes of Trump abusing kids, many dems are implicated, Clinton was a frequent flier to blackmail Island, both political parties are heavily compromised.Not between his two terms he wasn't. And surely Kamala and Biden would use it if it was there to stop his second term once and for all.
Either he isn't in there and/or many Democrats are implicated in there.
By the same token, why not just release them when he’s told his followers he would if he’s not implicated in any way? I’ve got no doubt that someone like Bill Clinton is potentially implicated but I wouldn’t assume anything, easiest way to shut it down is just release themSo then you would have to assume that he isn't in them or if he is that it is nothing actionable. Or that the Dems are so implicated in them as well that they couldn't do anything politically with it.
Don't think they can because the tapes involve victims, "many of whom are on the young side".By the same token, why not just release them when he’s told his followers he would if he’s not implicated in any way? I’ve got no doubt that someone like Bill Clinton is potentially implicated but I wouldn’t assume anything, easiest way to shut it down is just release them
![]()
FBI DIRECTOR KASH PATEL CONFIRMS THE FACTS - Nancy Pelosi involved in setting up Jan 6th - She made sure there were no National Guards on scene - Nancy and were team were busy filming a movie about Jan 6 (she later sold to HBO) - There were 250+ FB
FBI DIRECTOR KASH PATEL CONFIRMS THE FACTS - Nancy Pelosi involved in setting up Jan 6th - She made sure there were no National Guards on scene - Nancy and were team were busy filming a movie about...www.facebook.com